Failure in the junction region of T-stiffeners: 3D-braided vs. 2D tape laminate stiffeners

Qingda Yang, K. L. Rugg, B. N. Cox, M. C. Shaw

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Strain distributions and failure mechanisms are compared for a three-dimensionally (3D) braided T-stiffener (preform designed and supplied by 3TEX Inc.) and a conventional two-dimensional (2D) tape laminate T-stiffener, bonded onto a tape laminate skin. The strain distributions in a pull-off test are measured by laser speckle interferometry and calculated by computational simulations. With good agreement between experiment and theory, substantial differences are found between the two classes of stiffener. The tape laminate stiffeners exhibit large strain concentrations across the noodle region and in the adjacent radii, which correlate well with observed first cracking events. The 3D-braided stiffeners show relatively uniform strain distributions throughout the flanges, the web, and the flange/web junction region. Strain concentrations are modest at the corner of the junction and absent along the interface between the flanges and the skin. Failure in the 3D-braided stiffeners does not occur within the junction region, but by a sequence of cracking events, first next to the junction region and then at the end of one flange. The pull-off load at the first failure event is substantially higher for the 3D-braided stiffener than the tape laminate stiffener, which is attributed mainly to the relative absence of strain concentrations in the former. In predicting strain distributions, account is taken of the details of the 3D architecture of the 3D-braided stiffeners as specified by the supplier (3TEX Inc.) by using the Binary Model of textile composites, whose formulation has been described previously. Comparison of the predicted and measured spatial distributions of strain constitutes a critical test of the Binary Model. It is found to perform well in this case.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1653-1668
Number of pages16
JournalInternational Journal of Solids and Structures
Volume40
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

flanges
strain distribution
Laminates
Tapes
laminates
tapes
Flanges
speckle interferometry
laser interferometry
Cracking
preforms
textiles
Skin
Speckle Interferometry
Laser Interferometry
spatial distribution
Binary
Large Strain
Computational Simulation
Failure Mechanism

Keywords

  • Braided structure
  • Failure analysis
  • Textile composites

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Mechanics of Materials

Cite this

Failure in the junction region of T-stiffeners : 3D-braided vs. 2D tape laminate stiffeners. / Yang, Qingda; Rugg, K. L.; Cox, B. N.; Shaw, M. C.

In: International Journal of Solids and Structures, Vol. 40, No. 7, 01.04.2003, p. 1653-1668.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{912f5fb5c03246ae93f7d2a81d7bf7ab,
title = "Failure in the junction region of T-stiffeners: 3D-braided vs. 2D tape laminate stiffeners",
abstract = "Strain distributions and failure mechanisms are compared for a three-dimensionally (3D) braided T-stiffener (preform designed and supplied by 3TEX Inc.) and a conventional two-dimensional (2D) tape laminate T-stiffener, bonded onto a tape laminate skin. The strain distributions in a pull-off test are measured by laser speckle interferometry and calculated by computational simulations. With good agreement between experiment and theory, substantial differences are found between the two classes of stiffener. The tape laminate stiffeners exhibit large strain concentrations across the noodle region and in the adjacent radii, which correlate well with observed first cracking events. The 3D-braided stiffeners show relatively uniform strain distributions throughout the flanges, the web, and the flange/web junction region. Strain concentrations are modest at the corner of the junction and absent along the interface between the flanges and the skin. Failure in the 3D-braided stiffeners does not occur within the junction region, but by a sequence of cracking events, first next to the junction region and then at the end of one flange. The pull-off load at the first failure event is substantially higher for the 3D-braided stiffener than the tape laminate stiffener, which is attributed mainly to the relative absence of strain concentrations in the former. In predicting strain distributions, account is taken of the details of the 3D architecture of the 3D-braided stiffeners as specified by the supplier (3TEX Inc.) by using the Binary Model of textile composites, whose formulation has been described previously. Comparison of the predicted and measured spatial distributions of strain constitutes a critical test of the Binary Model. It is found to perform well in this case.",
keywords = "Braided structure, Failure analysis, Textile composites",
author = "Qingda Yang and Rugg, {K. L.} and Cox, {B. N.} and Shaw, {M. C.}",
year = "2003",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0020-7683(03)00026-X",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "1653--1668",
journal = "International Journal of Solids and Structures",
issn = "0020-7683",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Failure in the junction region of T-stiffeners

T2 - 3D-braided vs. 2D tape laminate stiffeners

AU - Yang, Qingda

AU - Rugg, K. L.

AU - Cox, B. N.

AU - Shaw, M. C.

PY - 2003/4/1

Y1 - 2003/4/1

N2 - Strain distributions and failure mechanisms are compared for a three-dimensionally (3D) braided T-stiffener (preform designed and supplied by 3TEX Inc.) and a conventional two-dimensional (2D) tape laminate T-stiffener, bonded onto a tape laminate skin. The strain distributions in a pull-off test are measured by laser speckle interferometry and calculated by computational simulations. With good agreement between experiment and theory, substantial differences are found between the two classes of stiffener. The tape laminate stiffeners exhibit large strain concentrations across the noodle region and in the adjacent radii, which correlate well with observed first cracking events. The 3D-braided stiffeners show relatively uniform strain distributions throughout the flanges, the web, and the flange/web junction region. Strain concentrations are modest at the corner of the junction and absent along the interface between the flanges and the skin. Failure in the 3D-braided stiffeners does not occur within the junction region, but by a sequence of cracking events, first next to the junction region and then at the end of one flange. The pull-off load at the first failure event is substantially higher for the 3D-braided stiffener than the tape laminate stiffener, which is attributed mainly to the relative absence of strain concentrations in the former. In predicting strain distributions, account is taken of the details of the 3D architecture of the 3D-braided stiffeners as specified by the supplier (3TEX Inc.) by using the Binary Model of textile composites, whose formulation has been described previously. Comparison of the predicted and measured spatial distributions of strain constitutes a critical test of the Binary Model. It is found to perform well in this case.

AB - Strain distributions and failure mechanisms are compared for a three-dimensionally (3D) braided T-stiffener (preform designed and supplied by 3TEX Inc.) and a conventional two-dimensional (2D) tape laminate T-stiffener, bonded onto a tape laminate skin. The strain distributions in a pull-off test are measured by laser speckle interferometry and calculated by computational simulations. With good agreement between experiment and theory, substantial differences are found between the two classes of stiffener. The tape laminate stiffeners exhibit large strain concentrations across the noodle region and in the adjacent radii, which correlate well with observed first cracking events. The 3D-braided stiffeners show relatively uniform strain distributions throughout the flanges, the web, and the flange/web junction region. Strain concentrations are modest at the corner of the junction and absent along the interface between the flanges and the skin. Failure in the 3D-braided stiffeners does not occur within the junction region, but by a sequence of cracking events, first next to the junction region and then at the end of one flange. The pull-off load at the first failure event is substantially higher for the 3D-braided stiffener than the tape laminate stiffener, which is attributed mainly to the relative absence of strain concentrations in the former. In predicting strain distributions, account is taken of the details of the 3D architecture of the 3D-braided stiffeners as specified by the supplier (3TEX Inc.) by using the Binary Model of textile composites, whose formulation has been described previously. Comparison of the predicted and measured spatial distributions of strain constitutes a critical test of the Binary Model. It is found to perform well in this case.

KW - Braided structure

KW - Failure analysis

KW - Textile composites

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037379122&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037379122&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0020-7683(03)00026-X

DO - 10.1016/S0020-7683(03)00026-X

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0037379122

VL - 40

SP - 1653

EP - 1668

JO - International Journal of Solids and Structures

JF - International Journal of Solids and Structures

SN - 0020-7683

IS - 7

ER -