Faecal indicator bacteria enumeration in beach sand

A comparison study of extraction methods in medium to coarse sands

A. B. Boehm, J. Griffith, C. McGee, T. A. Edge, Helena M Solo-Gabriele, R. Whitman, Y. Cao, M. Getrich, J. A. Jay, D. Ferguson, K. D. Goodwin, C. M. Lee, M. Madison, S. B. Weisberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

74 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims: The absence of standardized methods for quantifying faecal indicator bacteria (FIB) in sand hinders comparison of results across studies. The purpose of the study was to compare methods for extraction of faecal bacteria from sands and recommend a standardized extraction technique. Methods and Results: Twenty-two methods of extracting enterococci and Escherichia coli from sand were evaluated, including multiple permutations of hand shaking, mechanical shaking, blending, sonication, number of rinses, settling time, eluant-to-sand ratio, eluant composition, prefiltration and type of decantation. Tests were performed on sands from California, Florida and Lake Michigan. Most extraction parameters did not significantly affect bacterial enumeration. anova revealed significant effects of eluant composition and blending; with both sodium metaphosphate buffer and blending producing reduced counts. Conclusions: The simplest extraction method that produced the highest FIB recoveries consisted of 2 min of hand shaking in phosphate-buffered saline or deionized water, a 30-s settling time, one-rinse step and a 10 : 1 eluant volume to sand weight ratio. This result was consistent across the sand compositions tested in this study but could vary for other sand types. Significance and Impact of the Study: Method standardization will improve the understanding of how sands affect surface water quality.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1740-1750
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Applied Microbiology
Volume107
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2009

Fingerprint

Bacteria
Hand
Sonication
Water Quality
Enterococcus
Lakes
Buffers
Sodium
Phosphates
Escherichia coli
Weights and Measures
Water

Keywords

  • E. coli
  • Enterococci
  • Faecal bacteria
  • Sand

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
  • Biotechnology

Cite this

Faecal indicator bacteria enumeration in beach sand : A comparison study of extraction methods in medium to coarse sands. / Boehm, A. B.; Griffith, J.; McGee, C.; Edge, T. A.; Solo-Gabriele, Helena M; Whitman, R.; Cao, Y.; Getrich, M.; Jay, J. A.; Ferguson, D.; Goodwin, K. D.; Lee, C. M.; Madison, M.; Weisberg, S. B.

In: Journal of Applied Microbiology, Vol. 107, No. 5, 01.11.2009, p. 1740-1750.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Boehm, AB, Griffith, J, McGee, C, Edge, TA, Solo-Gabriele, HM, Whitman, R, Cao, Y, Getrich, M, Jay, JA, Ferguson, D, Goodwin, KD, Lee, CM, Madison, M & Weisberg, SB 2009, 'Faecal indicator bacteria enumeration in beach sand: A comparison study of extraction methods in medium to coarse sands', Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 107, no. 5, pp. 1740-1750. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04440.x
Boehm, A. B. ; Griffith, J. ; McGee, C. ; Edge, T. A. ; Solo-Gabriele, Helena M ; Whitman, R. ; Cao, Y. ; Getrich, M. ; Jay, J. A. ; Ferguson, D. ; Goodwin, K. D. ; Lee, C. M. ; Madison, M. ; Weisberg, S. B. / Faecal indicator bacteria enumeration in beach sand : A comparison study of extraction methods in medium to coarse sands. In: Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2009 ; Vol. 107, No. 5. pp. 1740-1750.
@article{83d9cd589164484293b90c2b058cbdd0,
title = "Faecal indicator bacteria enumeration in beach sand: A comparison study of extraction methods in medium to coarse sands",
abstract = "Aims: The absence of standardized methods for quantifying faecal indicator bacteria (FIB) in sand hinders comparison of results across studies. The purpose of the study was to compare methods for extraction of faecal bacteria from sands and recommend a standardized extraction technique. Methods and Results: Twenty-two methods of extracting enterococci and Escherichia coli from sand were evaluated, including multiple permutations of hand shaking, mechanical shaking, blending, sonication, number of rinses, settling time, eluant-to-sand ratio, eluant composition, prefiltration and type of decantation. Tests were performed on sands from California, Florida and Lake Michigan. Most extraction parameters did not significantly affect bacterial enumeration. anova revealed significant effects of eluant composition and blending; with both sodium metaphosphate buffer and blending producing reduced counts. Conclusions: The simplest extraction method that produced the highest FIB recoveries consisted of 2 min of hand shaking in phosphate-buffered saline or deionized water, a 30-s settling time, one-rinse step and a 10 : 1 eluant volume to sand weight ratio. This result was consistent across the sand compositions tested in this study but could vary for other sand types. Significance and Impact of the Study: Method standardization will improve the understanding of how sands affect surface water quality.",
keywords = "E. coli, Enterococci, Faecal bacteria, Sand",
author = "Boehm, {A. B.} and J. Griffith and C. McGee and Edge, {T. A.} and Solo-Gabriele, {Helena M} and R. Whitman and Y. Cao and M. Getrich and Jay, {J. A.} and D. Ferguson and Goodwin, {K. D.} and Lee, {C. M.} and M. Madison and Weisberg, {S. B.}",
year = "2009",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04440.x",
language = "English",
volume = "107",
pages = "1740--1750",
journal = "Journal of Applied Microbiology",
issn = "1364-5072",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Faecal indicator bacteria enumeration in beach sand

T2 - A comparison study of extraction methods in medium to coarse sands

AU - Boehm, A. B.

AU - Griffith, J.

AU - McGee, C.

AU - Edge, T. A.

AU - Solo-Gabriele, Helena M

AU - Whitman, R.

AU - Cao, Y.

AU - Getrich, M.

AU - Jay, J. A.

AU - Ferguson, D.

AU - Goodwin, K. D.

AU - Lee, C. M.

AU - Madison, M.

AU - Weisberg, S. B.

PY - 2009/11/1

Y1 - 2009/11/1

N2 - Aims: The absence of standardized methods for quantifying faecal indicator bacteria (FIB) in sand hinders comparison of results across studies. The purpose of the study was to compare methods for extraction of faecal bacteria from sands and recommend a standardized extraction technique. Methods and Results: Twenty-two methods of extracting enterococci and Escherichia coli from sand were evaluated, including multiple permutations of hand shaking, mechanical shaking, blending, sonication, number of rinses, settling time, eluant-to-sand ratio, eluant composition, prefiltration and type of decantation. Tests were performed on sands from California, Florida and Lake Michigan. Most extraction parameters did not significantly affect bacterial enumeration. anova revealed significant effects of eluant composition and blending; with both sodium metaphosphate buffer and blending producing reduced counts. Conclusions: The simplest extraction method that produced the highest FIB recoveries consisted of 2 min of hand shaking in phosphate-buffered saline or deionized water, a 30-s settling time, one-rinse step and a 10 : 1 eluant volume to sand weight ratio. This result was consistent across the sand compositions tested in this study but could vary for other sand types. Significance and Impact of the Study: Method standardization will improve the understanding of how sands affect surface water quality.

AB - Aims: The absence of standardized methods for quantifying faecal indicator bacteria (FIB) in sand hinders comparison of results across studies. The purpose of the study was to compare methods for extraction of faecal bacteria from sands and recommend a standardized extraction technique. Methods and Results: Twenty-two methods of extracting enterococci and Escherichia coli from sand were evaluated, including multiple permutations of hand shaking, mechanical shaking, blending, sonication, number of rinses, settling time, eluant-to-sand ratio, eluant composition, prefiltration and type of decantation. Tests were performed on sands from California, Florida and Lake Michigan. Most extraction parameters did not significantly affect bacterial enumeration. anova revealed significant effects of eluant composition and blending; with both sodium metaphosphate buffer and blending producing reduced counts. Conclusions: The simplest extraction method that produced the highest FIB recoveries consisted of 2 min of hand shaking in phosphate-buffered saline or deionized water, a 30-s settling time, one-rinse step and a 10 : 1 eluant volume to sand weight ratio. This result was consistent across the sand compositions tested in this study but could vary for other sand types. Significance and Impact of the Study: Method standardization will improve the understanding of how sands affect surface water quality.

KW - E. coli

KW - Enterococci

KW - Faecal bacteria

KW - Sand

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349947214&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349947214&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04440.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04440.x

M3 - Article

VL - 107

SP - 1740

EP - 1750

JO - Journal of Applied Microbiology

JF - Journal of Applied Microbiology

SN - 1364-5072

IS - 5

ER -