Expert performance in low-back disorder recognition using patient pain drawings

N. H. Mann, Mark Brown, I. Enger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Eight low-back-pain experts who regularly include pain drawings in their clinical workup were asked to classify 25 drawings. The experts used only the drawings to place cases into one of five broadly defined diagnostic categories: benign disorder, herniated disc, spinal stenosis, underlying disorder, or psychogenic disturbance. The physicians demonstrated adequate accuracy-51% correct-when compared with change (20% correct). Classification accuracy was greatest for psychogenic disorders (85%), followed by spinal stenosis (58%), herniated discs (52%), and benign disorders (50%). Predictions were comparatively poor for the underlying disorder category (10%). The individual physician accuracies varied from 44 to 60%. 'Classic' pain patterns for each disorder group were identified by determining which drawings were correctly classified by most physicians. Physicians may wish to impart greater significance to pain drawings close to one of our 'classic' patterns than to others.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)254-259
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Spinal Disorders
Volume5
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jan 1 1992

Fingerprint

Physicians
Pain
Spinal Stenosis
Intervertebral Disc Displacement
Low Back Pain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Expert performance in low-back disorder recognition using patient pain drawings. / Mann, N. H.; Brown, Mark; Enger, I.

In: Journal of Spinal Disorders, Vol. 5, No. 3, 01.01.1992, p. 254-259.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8d438e91407f4b7faf58d3d2ad3c4012,
title = "Expert performance in low-back disorder recognition using patient pain drawings",
abstract = "Eight low-back-pain experts who regularly include pain drawings in their clinical workup were asked to classify 25 drawings. The experts used only the drawings to place cases into one of five broadly defined diagnostic categories: benign disorder, herniated disc, spinal stenosis, underlying disorder, or psychogenic disturbance. The physicians demonstrated adequate accuracy-51{\%} correct-when compared with change (20{\%} correct). Classification accuracy was greatest for psychogenic disorders (85{\%}), followed by spinal stenosis (58{\%}), herniated discs (52{\%}), and benign disorders (50{\%}). Predictions were comparatively poor for the underlying disorder category (10{\%}). The individual physician accuracies varied from 44 to 60{\%}. 'Classic' pain patterns for each disorder group were identified by determining which drawings were correctly classified by most physicians. Physicians may wish to impart greater significance to pain drawings close to one of our 'classic' patterns than to others.",
author = "Mann, {N. H.} and Mark Brown and I. Enger",
year = "1992",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "254--259",
journal = "Journal of Spinal Disorders",
issn = "1536-0652",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Expert performance in low-back disorder recognition using patient pain drawings

AU - Mann, N. H.

AU - Brown, Mark

AU - Enger, I.

PY - 1992/1/1

Y1 - 1992/1/1

N2 - Eight low-back-pain experts who regularly include pain drawings in their clinical workup were asked to classify 25 drawings. The experts used only the drawings to place cases into one of five broadly defined diagnostic categories: benign disorder, herniated disc, spinal stenosis, underlying disorder, or psychogenic disturbance. The physicians demonstrated adequate accuracy-51% correct-when compared with change (20% correct). Classification accuracy was greatest for psychogenic disorders (85%), followed by spinal stenosis (58%), herniated discs (52%), and benign disorders (50%). Predictions were comparatively poor for the underlying disorder category (10%). The individual physician accuracies varied from 44 to 60%. 'Classic' pain patterns for each disorder group were identified by determining which drawings were correctly classified by most physicians. Physicians may wish to impart greater significance to pain drawings close to one of our 'classic' patterns than to others.

AB - Eight low-back-pain experts who regularly include pain drawings in their clinical workup were asked to classify 25 drawings. The experts used only the drawings to place cases into one of five broadly defined diagnostic categories: benign disorder, herniated disc, spinal stenosis, underlying disorder, or psychogenic disturbance. The physicians demonstrated adequate accuracy-51% correct-when compared with change (20% correct). Classification accuracy was greatest for psychogenic disorders (85%), followed by spinal stenosis (58%), herniated discs (52%), and benign disorders (50%). Predictions were comparatively poor for the underlying disorder category (10%). The individual physician accuracies varied from 44 to 60%. 'Classic' pain patterns for each disorder group were identified by determining which drawings were correctly classified by most physicians. Physicians may wish to impart greater significance to pain drawings close to one of our 'classic' patterns than to others.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026785512&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026785512&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 1387821

AN - SCOPUS:0026785512

VL - 5

SP - 254

EP - 259

JO - Journal of Spinal Disorders

JF - Journal of Spinal Disorders

SN - 1536-0652

IS - 3

ER -