Expected utility, self-control, morality, and criminal probability

Charles R. Tittle, Olena P Antonaccio, Ekaterina Botchkovar, Maria Kranidioti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

With data from random sample household surveys conducted simultaneously in major cities in Greece and in Russia, we evaluate the import of individuals' morality relative to expected utility and self-control in predicting criminal probability. In addition, we examine potential interactions among the three variables in predicting criminal propensity and compare their relative effects across the two samples. The results suggest that all three factors are important and mostly independent influences in explaining criminal probability. However, the estimated effects of morality are substantially stronger than those of either expected utility or self-control, and all three of these explanatory variables appear to be somewhat sensitive to cultural contexts. Overall, our findings confirm that morality plays a comparatively larger part in explaining conformity than is generally recognized by major contemporary theories, although the data cannot show whether morality is an element in rational decision making or represents a contrary "non-rational" element in accounting for human conduct.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1029-1046
Number of pages18
JournalSocial Science Research
Volume39
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2010

Fingerprint

self-control
morality
household survey
conformity
random sample
Greece
import
Russia
decision making
interaction

Keywords

  • Greece
  • Morality
  • Rational choice theory
  • Russia
  • Self-control theory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Expected utility, self-control, morality, and criminal probability. / Tittle, Charles R.; Antonaccio, Olena P; Botchkovar, Ekaterina; Kranidioti, Maria.

In: Social Science Research, Vol. 39, No. 6, 01.11.2010, p. 1029-1046.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tittle, Charles R. ; Antonaccio, Olena P ; Botchkovar, Ekaterina ; Kranidioti, Maria. / Expected utility, self-control, morality, and criminal probability. In: Social Science Research. 2010 ; Vol. 39, No. 6. pp. 1029-1046.
@article{93e21b47dc874b30a89bc137da6c3cb5,
title = "Expected utility, self-control, morality, and criminal probability",
abstract = "With data from random sample household surveys conducted simultaneously in major cities in Greece and in Russia, we evaluate the import of individuals' morality relative to expected utility and self-control in predicting criminal probability. In addition, we examine potential interactions among the three variables in predicting criminal propensity and compare their relative effects across the two samples. The results suggest that all three factors are important and mostly independent influences in explaining criminal probability. However, the estimated effects of morality are substantially stronger than those of either expected utility or self-control, and all three of these explanatory variables appear to be somewhat sensitive to cultural contexts. Overall, our findings confirm that morality plays a comparatively larger part in explaining conformity than is generally recognized by major contemporary theories, although the data cannot show whether morality is an element in rational decision making or represents a contrary {"}non-rational{"} element in accounting for human conduct.",
keywords = "Greece, Morality, Rational choice theory, Russia, Self-control theory",
author = "Tittle, {Charles R.} and Antonaccio, {Olena P} and Ekaterina Botchkovar and Maria Kranidioti",
year = "2010",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.08.007",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "1029--1046",
journal = "Social Science Research",
issn = "0049-089X",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Expected utility, self-control, morality, and criminal probability

AU - Tittle, Charles R.

AU - Antonaccio, Olena P

AU - Botchkovar, Ekaterina

AU - Kranidioti, Maria

PY - 2010/11/1

Y1 - 2010/11/1

N2 - With data from random sample household surveys conducted simultaneously in major cities in Greece and in Russia, we evaluate the import of individuals' morality relative to expected utility and self-control in predicting criminal probability. In addition, we examine potential interactions among the three variables in predicting criminal propensity and compare their relative effects across the two samples. The results suggest that all three factors are important and mostly independent influences in explaining criminal probability. However, the estimated effects of morality are substantially stronger than those of either expected utility or self-control, and all three of these explanatory variables appear to be somewhat sensitive to cultural contexts. Overall, our findings confirm that morality plays a comparatively larger part in explaining conformity than is generally recognized by major contemporary theories, although the data cannot show whether morality is an element in rational decision making or represents a contrary "non-rational" element in accounting for human conduct.

AB - With data from random sample household surveys conducted simultaneously in major cities in Greece and in Russia, we evaluate the import of individuals' morality relative to expected utility and self-control in predicting criminal probability. In addition, we examine potential interactions among the three variables in predicting criminal propensity and compare their relative effects across the two samples. The results suggest that all three factors are important and mostly independent influences in explaining criminal probability. However, the estimated effects of morality are substantially stronger than those of either expected utility or self-control, and all three of these explanatory variables appear to be somewhat sensitive to cultural contexts. Overall, our findings confirm that morality plays a comparatively larger part in explaining conformity than is generally recognized by major contemporary theories, although the data cannot show whether morality is an element in rational decision making or represents a contrary "non-rational" element in accounting for human conduct.

KW - Greece

KW - Morality

KW - Rational choice theory

KW - Russia

KW - Self-control theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77958460868&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77958460868&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.08.007

DO - 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.08.007

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 1029

EP - 1046

JO - Social Science Research

JF - Social Science Research

SN - 0049-089X

IS - 6

ER -