Exit and Entrance Polling: A Comparison of Election Survey Methods

Casey A Klofstad, Benjamin G. Bishin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We report the results of an experiment in which voters participating in the 2008 presidential election were surveyed either as they exited their voting places (a traditional exit poll) or as they waited in line to vote (an "entrance poll"). To the best of our knowledge, the efficacy of entrance polling has not been studied previously. Our data show that the entrance poll, when compared to the exit poll, produced a significantly higher cooperation rate among voters and a significantly lower item nonresponse rate. In our discussion of these results, we examine the benefits and potential complications of entrance polling.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)429-437
Number of pages9
JournalField Methods
Volume24
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2012

Fingerprint

response behavior
presidential election
voting
voter
election
experiment

Keywords

  • cooperation rate
  • election survey
  • entrance poll
  • exit poll
  • nonresponse

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology

Cite this

Exit and Entrance Polling : A Comparison of Election Survey Methods. / Klofstad, Casey A; Bishin, Benjamin G.

In: Field Methods, Vol. 24, No. 4, 11.2012, p. 429-437.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Klofstad, Casey A ; Bishin, Benjamin G. / Exit and Entrance Polling : A Comparison of Election Survey Methods. In: Field Methods. 2012 ; Vol. 24, No. 4. pp. 429-437.
@article{31bd721d4f6345a59384f856e364ee32,
title = "Exit and Entrance Polling: A Comparison of Election Survey Methods",
abstract = "We report the results of an experiment in which voters participating in the 2008 presidential election were surveyed either as they exited their voting places (a traditional exit poll) or as they waited in line to vote (an {"}entrance poll{"}). To the best of our knowledge, the efficacy of entrance polling has not been studied previously. Our data show that the entrance poll, when compared to the exit poll, produced a significantly higher cooperation rate among voters and a significantly lower item nonresponse rate. In our discussion of these results, we examine the benefits and potential complications of entrance polling.",
keywords = "cooperation rate, election survey, entrance poll, exit poll, nonresponse",
author = "Klofstad, {Casey A} and Bishin, {Benjamin G.}",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1177/1525822X12449711",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "429--437",
journal = "Field Methods",
issn = "1525-822X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exit and Entrance Polling

T2 - A Comparison of Election Survey Methods

AU - Klofstad, Casey A

AU - Bishin, Benjamin G.

PY - 2012/11

Y1 - 2012/11

N2 - We report the results of an experiment in which voters participating in the 2008 presidential election were surveyed either as they exited their voting places (a traditional exit poll) or as they waited in line to vote (an "entrance poll"). To the best of our knowledge, the efficacy of entrance polling has not been studied previously. Our data show that the entrance poll, when compared to the exit poll, produced a significantly higher cooperation rate among voters and a significantly lower item nonresponse rate. In our discussion of these results, we examine the benefits and potential complications of entrance polling.

AB - We report the results of an experiment in which voters participating in the 2008 presidential election were surveyed either as they exited their voting places (a traditional exit poll) or as they waited in line to vote (an "entrance poll"). To the best of our knowledge, the efficacy of entrance polling has not been studied previously. Our data show that the entrance poll, when compared to the exit poll, produced a significantly higher cooperation rate among voters and a significantly lower item nonresponse rate. In our discussion of these results, we examine the benefits and potential complications of entrance polling.

KW - cooperation rate

KW - election survey

KW - entrance poll

KW - exit poll

KW - nonresponse

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867672727&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867672727&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1525822X12449711

DO - 10.1177/1525822X12449711

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84867672727

VL - 24

SP - 429

EP - 437

JO - Field Methods

JF - Field Methods

SN - 1525-822X

IS - 4

ER -