Evolution of Precipitation Structure During the November DYNAMO MJO Event

Cloud-Resolving Model Intercomparison and Cross Validation Using Radar Observations

Xiaowen Li, Matthew A. Janiga, Shuguang Wang, Wei Kuo Tao, Angela Rowe, Weixin Xu, Chuntao Liu, Toshihisa Matsui, Chidong Zhang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Evolution of precipitation structures are simulated and compared with radar observations for the November Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO) event during the DYNAmics of the MJO (DYNAMO) field campaign. Three ground-based, ship-borne, and spaceborne precipitation radars and three cloud-resolving models (CRMs) driven by observed large-scale forcing are used to study precipitation structures at different locations over the central equatorial Indian Ocean. Convective strength is represented by 0-dBZ echo-top heights, and convective organization by contiguous 17-dBZ areas. The multi-radar and multi-model framework allows for more stringent model validations. The emphasis is on testing models' ability to simulate subtle differences observed at different radar sites when the MJO event passed through. The results show that CRMs forced by site-specific large-scale forcing can reproduce not only common features in cloud populations but also subtle variations observed by different radars. The comparisons also revealed common deficiencies in CRM simulations where they underestimate radar echo-top heights for the strongest convection within large, organized precipitation features. Cross validations with multiple radars and models also enable quantitative comparisons in CRM sensitivity studies using different large-scale forcing, microphysical schemes and parameters, resolutions, and domain sizes. In terms of radar echo-top height temporal variations, many model sensitivity tests have better correlations than radar/model comparisons, indicating robustness in model performance on this aspect. It is further shown that well-validated model simulations could be used to constrain uncertainties in observed echo-top heights when the low-resolution surveillance scanning strategy is used.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3530-3555
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Volume123
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 16 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Madden-Julian Oscillation
Madden-Julian oscillation
radar tracking
radar
Radar
radar echoes
simulation models
echoes
model validation
ships
Indian Ocean
strength (mechanics)
temporal variation
sensitivity
uncertainty
surveillance
testing
simulation

Keywords

  • cloud-resolving model
  • MJO
  • model intercomparison
  • precipitation structure
  • radar
  • validation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geophysics
  • Oceanography
  • Forestry
  • Aquatic Science
  • Ecology
  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Soil Science
  • Geochemistry and Petrology
  • Earth-Surface Processes
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
  • Polymers and Plastics
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Space and Planetary Science
  • Materials Chemistry
  • Palaeontology

Cite this

Evolution of Precipitation Structure During the November DYNAMO MJO Event : Cloud-Resolving Model Intercomparison and Cross Validation Using Radar Observations. / Li, Xiaowen; Janiga, Matthew A.; Wang, Shuguang; Tao, Wei Kuo; Rowe, Angela; Xu, Weixin; Liu, Chuntao; Matsui, Toshihisa; Zhang, Chidong.

In: Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 123, No. 7, 16.04.2018, p. 3530-3555.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Li, Xiaowen ; Janiga, Matthew A. ; Wang, Shuguang ; Tao, Wei Kuo ; Rowe, Angela ; Xu, Weixin ; Liu, Chuntao ; Matsui, Toshihisa ; Zhang, Chidong. / Evolution of Precipitation Structure During the November DYNAMO MJO Event : Cloud-Resolving Model Intercomparison and Cross Validation Using Radar Observations. In: Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 2018 ; Vol. 123, No. 7. pp. 3530-3555.
@article{a81ed2dcf4cf4dba8c5c2124e247c660,
title = "Evolution of Precipitation Structure During the November DYNAMO MJO Event: Cloud-Resolving Model Intercomparison and Cross Validation Using Radar Observations",
abstract = "Evolution of precipitation structures are simulated and compared with radar observations for the November Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO) event during the DYNAmics of the MJO (DYNAMO) field campaign. Three ground-based, ship-borne, and spaceborne precipitation radars and three cloud-resolving models (CRMs) driven by observed large-scale forcing are used to study precipitation structures at different locations over the central equatorial Indian Ocean. Convective strength is represented by 0-dBZ echo-top heights, and convective organization by contiguous 17-dBZ areas. The multi-radar and multi-model framework allows for more stringent model validations. The emphasis is on testing models' ability to simulate subtle differences observed at different radar sites when the MJO event passed through. The results show that CRMs forced by site-specific large-scale forcing can reproduce not only common features in cloud populations but also subtle variations observed by different radars. The comparisons also revealed common deficiencies in CRM simulations where they underestimate radar echo-top heights for the strongest convection within large, organized precipitation features. Cross validations with multiple radars and models also enable quantitative comparisons in CRM sensitivity studies using different large-scale forcing, microphysical schemes and parameters, resolutions, and domain sizes. In terms of radar echo-top height temporal variations, many model sensitivity tests have better correlations than radar/model comparisons, indicating robustness in model performance on this aspect. It is further shown that well-validated model simulations could be used to constrain uncertainties in observed echo-top heights when the low-resolution surveillance scanning strategy is used.",
keywords = "cloud-resolving model, MJO, model intercomparison, precipitation structure, radar, validation",
author = "Xiaowen Li and Janiga, {Matthew A.} and Shuguang Wang and Tao, {Wei Kuo} and Angela Rowe and Weixin Xu and Chuntao Liu and Toshihisa Matsui and Chidong Zhang",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1002/2017JD027775",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "123",
pages = "3530--3555",
journal = "Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans",
issn = "2169-9275",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evolution of Precipitation Structure During the November DYNAMO MJO Event

T2 - Cloud-Resolving Model Intercomparison and Cross Validation Using Radar Observations

AU - Li, Xiaowen

AU - Janiga, Matthew A.

AU - Wang, Shuguang

AU - Tao, Wei Kuo

AU - Rowe, Angela

AU - Xu, Weixin

AU - Liu, Chuntao

AU - Matsui, Toshihisa

AU - Zhang, Chidong

PY - 2018/4/16

Y1 - 2018/4/16

N2 - Evolution of precipitation structures are simulated and compared with radar observations for the November Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO) event during the DYNAmics of the MJO (DYNAMO) field campaign. Three ground-based, ship-borne, and spaceborne precipitation radars and three cloud-resolving models (CRMs) driven by observed large-scale forcing are used to study precipitation structures at different locations over the central equatorial Indian Ocean. Convective strength is represented by 0-dBZ echo-top heights, and convective organization by contiguous 17-dBZ areas. The multi-radar and multi-model framework allows for more stringent model validations. The emphasis is on testing models' ability to simulate subtle differences observed at different radar sites when the MJO event passed through. The results show that CRMs forced by site-specific large-scale forcing can reproduce not only common features in cloud populations but also subtle variations observed by different radars. The comparisons also revealed common deficiencies in CRM simulations where they underestimate radar echo-top heights for the strongest convection within large, organized precipitation features. Cross validations with multiple radars and models also enable quantitative comparisons in CRM sensitivity studies using different large-scale forcing, microphysical schemes and parameters, resolutions, and domain sizes. In terms of radar echo-top height temporal variations, many model sensitivity tests have better correlations than radar/model comparisons, indicating robustness in model performance on this aspect. It is further shown that well-validated model simulations could be used to constrain uncertainties in observed echo-top heights when the low-resolution surveillance scanning strategy is used.

AB - Evolution of precipitation structures are simulated and compared with radar observations for the November Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO) event during the DYNAmics of the MJO (DYNAMO) field campaign. Three ground-based, ship-borne, and spaceborne precipitation radars and three cloud-resolving models (CRMs) driven by observed large-scale forcing are used to study precipitation structures at different locations over the central equatorial Indian Ocean. Convective strength is represented by 0-dBZ echo-top heights, and convective organization by contiguous 17-dBZ areas. The multi-radar and multi-model framework allows for more stringent model validations. The emphasis is on testing models' ability to simulate subtle differences observed at different radar sites when the MJO event passed through. The results show that CRMs forced by site-specific large-scale forcing can reproduce not only common features in cloud populations but also subtle variations observed by different radars. The comparisons also revealed common deficiencies in CRM simulations where they underestimate radar echo-top heights for the strongest convection within large, organized precipitation features. Cross validations with multiple radars and models also enable quantitative comparisons in CRM sensitivity studies using different large-scale forcing, microphysical schemes and parameters, resolutions, and domain sizes. In terms of radar echo-top height temporal variations, many model sensitivity tests have better correlations than radar/model comparisons, indicating robustness in model performance on this aspect. It is further shown that well-validated model simulations could be used to constrain uncertainties in observed echo-top heights when the low-resolution surveillance scanning strategy is used.

KW - cloud-resolving model

KW - MJO

KW - model intercomparison

KW - precipitation structure

KW - radar

KW - validation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045835676&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045835676&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/2017JD027775

DO - 10.1002/2017JD027775

M3 - Article

VL - 123

SP - 3530

EP - 3555

JO - Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans

JF - Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans

SN - 2169-9275

IS - 7

ER -