Evidence matters

Science, proof, and truth in the law

Research output: Book/ReportBook

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Is truth in the law just plain truth – or something sui generis? Is a trial a search for truth? Do adversarial procedures and exclusionary rules of evidence enable, or impede, the accurate determination of factual issues? Can degrees of proof be identified with mathematical probabilities? What role can statistical evidence properly play? How can courts best handle the scientific testimony on which cases sometimes turn? How are they to distinguish reliable scientific testimony from unreliable hokum? The dozen interdisciplinary essays collected here explore a whole nexus of such questions about science, proof, and truth in the law. With her characteristic clarity and verve, in these essays Haack brings her original and distinctive work in theory of knowledge and philosophy of science to bear on real-life legal issues. She includes detailed analyses of a wide variety of cases and lucid summaries of relevant scientific work, of the many roles of the scientific peer-review system, and of relevant legal developments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
PublisherCambridge University Press
Number of pages416
ISBN (Print)9781139626866, 9781107039964
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Law
science
testimony
evidence
philosophy of science
peer review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Evidence matters : Science, proof, and truth in the law. / Haack, Susan.

Cambridge University Press, 2014. 416 p.

Research output: Book/ReportBook

Haack, Susan. / Evidence matters : Science, proof, and truth in the law. Cambridge University Press, 2014. 416 p.
@book{76918b3b6b5f4e1fb811a32111197cfd,
title = "Evidence matters: Science, proof, and truth in the law",
abstract = "Is truth in the law just plain truth – or something sui generis? Is a trial a search for truth? Do adversarial procedures and exclusionary rules of evidence enable, or impede, the accurate determination of factual issues? Can degrees of proof be identified with mathematical probabilities? What role can statistical evidence properly play? How can courts best handle the scientific testimony on which cases sometimes turn? How are they to distinguish reliable scientific testimony from unreliable hokum? The dozen interdisciplinary essays collected here explore a whole nexus of such questions about science, proof, and truth in the law. With her characteristic clarity and verve, in these essays Haack brings her original and distinctive work in theory of knowledge and philosophy of science to bear on real-life legal issues. She includes detailed analyses of a wide variety of cases and lucid summaries of relevant scientific work, of the many roles of the scientific peer-review system, and of relevant legal developments.",
author = "Susan Haack",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9781139626866",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781139626866",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - BOOK

T1 - Evidence matters

T2 - Science, proof, and truth in the law

AU - Haack, Susan

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Is truth in the law just plain truth – or something sui generis? Is a trial a search for truth? Do adversarial procedures and exclusionary rules of evidence enable, or impede, the accurate determination of factual issues? Can degrees of proof be identified with mathematical probabilities? What role can statistical evidence properly play? How can courts best handle the scientific testimony on which cases sometimes turn? How are they to distinguish reliable scientific testimony from unreliable hokum? The dozen interdisciplinary essays collected here explore a whole nexus of such questions about science, proof, and truth in the law. With her characteristic clarity and verve, in these essays Haack brings her original and distinctive work in theory of knowledge and philosophy of science to bear on real-life legal issues. She includes detailed analyses of a wide variety of cases and lucid summaries of relevant scientific work, of the many roles of the scientific peer-review system, and of relevant legal developments.

AB - Is truth in the law just plain truth – or something sui generis? Is a trial a search for truth? Do adversarial procedures and exclusionary rules of evidence enable, or impede, the accurate determination of factual issues? Can degrees of proof be identified with mathematical probabilities? What role can statistical evidence properly play? How can courts best handle the scientific testimony on which cases sometimes turn? How are they to distinguish reliable scientific testimony from unreliable hokum? The dozen interdisciplinary essays collected here explore a whole nexus of such questions about science, proof, and truth in the law. With her characteristic clarity and verve, in these essays Haack brings her original and distinctive work in theory of knowledge and philosophy of science to bear on real-life legal issues. She includes detailed analyses of a wide variety of cases and lucid summaries of relevant scientific work, of the many roles of the scientific peer-review system, and of relevant legal developments.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84953377536&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84953377536&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9781139626866

DO - 10.1017/CBO9781139626866

M3 - Book

SN - 9781139626866

SN - 9781107039964

BT - Evidence matters

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -