Evidence-based management of primary angle closure glaucoma

Matthew E. Emanuel, Richard K Parrish, Steven J Gedde

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the classification of primary angle closure (PAC) and discuss the evidence-based management of each type. RECENT FINDINGS: There is limited evidence to support the prophylactic treatment of primary angle closure suspects. Cataract and clear lens extraction may be more effective than traditional therapy in controlling intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with PAC, primary angle closure glaucoma, and acute angle closure crisis. SUMMARY: Treatment of angle closure depends on the signs of chronic angle damage and glaucomatous optic neuropathy. In the absence of such evidence, serial gonioscopy may be the preferred therapy. If signs or symptoms are present, medical therapy and laser peripheral iridotomy are beneficial. However, recent data suggest that cataract extraction may be more effective at controlling the IOP than laser or incisional glaucoma procedures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)89-92
Number of pages4
JournalCurrent Opinion in Ophthalmology
Volume25
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2014

Fingerprint

Angle Closure Glaucoma
Intraocular Pressure
Gonioscopy
Optic Nerve Diseases
Cataract Extraction
Malocclusion
Laser Therapy
Therapeutics
Glaucoma
Cataract
Lenses
Signs and Symptoms
Lasers

Keywords

  • angle closure
  • cataract extraction
  • glaucoma
  • laser peripheral iridotomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Evidence-based management of primary angle closure glaucoma. / Emanuel, Matthew E.; Parrish, Richard K; Gedde, Steven J.

In: Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, Vol. 25, No. 2, 01.03.2014, p. 89-92.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a588eb45403f4eb9b77dea037c6474ed,
title = "Evidence-based management of primary angle closure glaucoma",
abstract = "PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the classification of primary angle closure (PAC) and discuss the evidence-based management of each type. RECENT FINDINGS: There is limited evidence to support the prophylactic treatment of primary angle closure suspects. Cataract and clear lens extraction may be more effective than traditional therapy in controlling intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with PAC, primary angle closure glaucoma, and acute angle closure crisis. SUMMARY: Treatment of angle closure depends on the signs of chronic angle damage and glaucomatous optic neuropathy. In the absence of such evidence, serial gonioscopy may be the preferred therapy. If signs or symptoms are present, medical therapy and laser peripheral iridotomy are beneficial. However, recent data suggest that cataract extraction may be more effective at controlling the IOP than laser or incisional glaucoma procedures.",
keywords = "angle closure, cataract extraction, glaucoma, laser peripheral iridotomy",
author = "Emanuel, {Matthew E.} and Parrish, {Richard K} and Gedde, {Steven J}",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/ICU.0000000000000028",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "89--92",
journal = "Current Opinion in Ophthalmology",
issn = "1040-8738",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evidence-based management of primary angle closure glaucoma

AU - Emanuel, Matthew E.

AU - Parrish, Richard K

AU - Gedde, Steven J

PY - 2014/3/1

Y1 - 2014/3/1

N2 - PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the classification of primary angle closure (PAC) and discuss the evidence-based management of each type. RECENT FINDINGS: There is limited evidence to support the prophylactic treatment of primary angle closure suspects. Cataract and clear lens extraction may be more effective than traditional therapy in controlling intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with PAC, primary angle closure glaucoma, and acute angle closure crisis. SUMMARY: Treatment of angle closure depends on the signs of chronic angle damage and glaucomatous optic neuropathy. In the absence of such evidence, serial gonioscopy may be the preferred therapy. If signs or symptoms are present, medical therapy and laser peripheral iridotomy are beneficial. However, recent data suggest that cataract extraction may be more effective at controlling the IOP than laser or incisional glaucoma procedures.

AB - PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the classification of primary angle closure (PAC) and discuss the evidence-based management of each type. RECENT FINDINGS: There is limited evidence to support the prophylactic treatment of primary angle closure suspects. Cataract and clear lens extraction may be more effective than traditional therapy in controlling intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with PAC, primary angle closure glaucoma, and acute angle closure crisis. SUMMARY: Treatment of angle closure depends on the signs of chronic angle damage and glaucomatous optic neuropathy. In the absence of such evidence, serial gonioscopy may be the preferred therapy. If signs or symptoms are present, medical therapy and laser peripheral iridotomy are beneficial. However, recent data suggest that cataract extraction may be more effective at controlling the IOP than laser or incisional glaucoma procedures.

KW - angle closure

KW - cataract extraction

KW - glaucoma

KW - laser peripheral iridotomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84894030993&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84894030993&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000028

DO - 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000028

M3 - Article

C2 - 24463418

AN - SCOPUS:84894030993

VL - 25

SP - 89

EP - 92

JO - Current Opinion in Ophthalmology

JF - Current Opinion in Ophthalmology

SN - 1040-8738

IS - 2

ER -