Evidence-based assessment of adherence to medical treatments in pediatric psychology

Alexandra Quittner, Avani C. Modi, Kathleen L. Lemanek, Carolyn E. Ievers-Landis, Michael A. Rapoff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

180 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Adherence to medical regimens for children and adolescents with chronic conditions is generally below 50% and is considered the single, greatest cause of treatment failure. As the prevalence of chronic illnesses in pediatric populations increases and awareness of the negative consequences of poor adherence become clearer, the need for reliable and valid measures of adherence has grown. Methods: This review evaluated empirical evidence for 18 measures utilizing three assessment methods: (a) self-report or structured interviews, (b) daily diary methods, and (c) electronic monitors. Results: Ten measures met the "well-established" evidence-based (EBA) criteria. Conclusions: Several recommendations for improving adherence assessment were made. In particular, consideration should be given to the use of innovative technologies that provide a window into the "real time" behaviors of patients and families. Providing written treatment plans, identifying barriers to good adherence, and examining racial and ethnic differences in attitudes, beliefs and behaviors affecting adherence were strongly recommended.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)916-936
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Pediatric Psychology
Volume33
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2008

Fingerprint

Child Psychology
Treatment Failure
Self Report
Chronic Disease
Therapeutics
Interviews
Pediatrics
Technology
Population

Keywords

  • Adherence
  • Diary methods
  • Electronic monitors
  • Empirically-supported
  • Measurement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Quittner, A., Modi, A. C., Lemanek, K. L., Ievers-Landis, C. E., & Rapoff, M. A. (2008). Evidence-based assessment of adherence to medical treatments in pediatric psychology. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 33(9), 916-936. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsm064

Evidence-based assessment of adherence to medical treatments in pediatric psychology. / Quittner, Alexandra; Modi, Avani C.; Lemanek, Kathleen L.; Ievers-Landis, Carolyn E.; Rapoff, Michael A.

In: Journal of Pediatric Psychology, Vol. 33, No. 9, 01.10.2008, p. 916-936.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Quittner, A, Modi, AC, Lemanek, KL, Ievers-Landis, CE & Rapoff, MA 2008, 'Evidence-based assessment of adherence to medical treatments in pediatric psychology', Journal of Pediatric Psychology, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 916-936. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsm064
Quittner, Alexandra ; Modi, Avani C. ; Lemanek, Kathleen L. ; Ievers-Landis, Carolyn E. ; Rapoff, Michael A. / Evidence-based assessment of adherence to medical treatments in pediatric psychology. In: Journal of Pediatric Psychology. 2008 ; Vol. 33, No. 9. pp. 916-936.
@article{2b941d46994643a79a14508a68ec9238,
title = "Evidence-based assessment of adherence to medical treatments in pediatric psychology",
abstract = "Objectives: Adherence to medical regimens for children and adolescents with chronic conditions is generally below 50{\%} and is considered the single, greatest cause of treatment failure. As the prevalence of chronic illnesses in pediatric populations increases and awareness of the negative consequences of poor adherence become clearer, the need for reliable and valid measures of adherence has grown. Methods: This review evaluated empirical evidence for 18 measures utilizing three assessment methods: (a) self-report or structured interviews, (b) daily diary methods, and (c) electronic monitors. Results: Ten measures met the {"}well-established{"} evidence-based (EBA) criteria. Conclusions: Several recommendations for improving adherence assessment were made. In particular, consideration should be given to the use of innovative technologies that provide a window into the {"}real time{"} behaviors of patients and families. Providing written treatment plans, identifying barriers to good adherence, and examining racial and ethnic differences in attitudes, beliefs and behaviors affecting adherence were strongly recommended.",
keywords = "Adherence, Diary methods, Electronic monitors, Empirically-supported, Measurement",
author = "Alexandra Quittner and Modi, {Avani C.} and Lemanek, {Kathleen L.} and Ievers-Landis, {Carolyn E.} and Rapoff, {Michael A.}",
year = "2008",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/jpepsy/jsm064",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "916--936",
journal = "Journal of Pediatric Psychology",
issn = "0146-8693",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evidence-based assessment of adherence to medical treatments in pediatric psychology

AU - Quittner, Alexandra

AU - Modi, Avani C.

AU - Lemanek, Kathleen L.

AU - Ievers-Landis, Carolyn E.

AU - Rapoff, Michael A.

PY - 2008/10/1

Y1 - 2008/10/1

N2 - Objectives: Adherence to medical regimens for children and adolescents with chronic conditions is generally below 50% and is considered the single, greatest cause of treatment failure. As the prevalence of chronic illnesses in pediatric populations increases and awareness of the negative consequences of poor adherence become clearer, the need for reliable and valid measures of adherence has grown. Methods: This review evaluated empirical evidence for 18 measures utilizing three assessment methods: (a) self-report or structured interviews, (b) daily diary methods, and (c) electronic monitors. Results: Ten measures met the "well-established" evidence-based (EBA) criteria. Conclusions: Several recommendations for improving adherence assessment were made. In particular, consideration should be given to the use of innovative technologies that provide a window into the "real time" behaviors of patients and families. Providing written treatment plans, identifying barriers to good adherence, and examining racial and ethnic differences in attitudes, beliefs and behaviors affecting adherence were strongly recommended.

AB - Objectives: Adherence to medical regimens for children and adolescents with chronic conditions is generally below 50% and is considered the single, greatest cause of treatment failure. As the prevalence of chronic illnesses in pediatric populations increases and awareness of the negative consequences of poor adherence become clearer, the need for reliable and valid measures of adherence has grown. Methods: This review evaluated empirical evidence for 18 measures utilizing three assessment methods: (a) self-report or structured interviews, (b) daily diary methods, and (c) electronic monitors. Results: Ten measures met the "well-established" evidence-based (EBA) criteria. Conclusions: Several recommendations for improving adherence assessment were made. In particular, consideration should be given to the use of innovative technologies that provide a window into the "real time" behaviors of patients and families. Providing written treatment plans, identifying barriers to good adherence, and examining racial and ethnic differences in attitudes, beliefs and behaviors affecting adherence were strongly recommended.

KW - Adherence

KW - Diary methods

KW - Electronic monitors

KW - Empirically-supported

KW - Measurement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=52449130639&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=52449130639&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jpepsy/jsm064

DO - 10.1093/jpepsy/jsm064

M3 - Article

C2 - 17846042

AN - SCOPUS:52449130639

VL - 33

SP - 916

EP - 936

JO - Journal of Pediatric Psychology

JF - Journal of Pediatric Psychology

SN - 0146-8693

IS - 9

ER -