Evaluation of potential image acquisition pitfalls during optical coherence tomography and their influence on retinal image segmentation

Gábor Márk Somfai, Harry M. Salinas, Carmen A. Puliafito, Delia Cabrera DeBuc

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The development of improved segmentation algorithms for more consistently accurate detection of retinal boundaries is a potentially useful solution to the limitations of existing optical coherence tomography (OCT) software. We modeled artifacts related to operator errors that may normally occur during OCT imaging and evaluated their influence on segmentation results using a novel segmentation algorithm. These artifacts included: defocusing, depolarization, decentration, and a combination of defocusing and depolarization. Mean relative reflectance and average thickness of the automatically extracted intraretinal layers was then measured. Our results show that defocusing and depolarization errors together have the greatest altering effect on all measurements and on segmentation accuracy. A marked decrease in mean relative reflectance and average thickness was observed due to depolarization artifact in all intraretinal layers, while defocus resulted in a less-marked decrease. Decentration resulted in a marked but not significant change in average thickness. Our study demonstrates that care must be taken for good-quality imaging when measurements of intraretinal layers using the novel algorithm are planned in future studies. An awareness of these pitfalls and their possible solutions is crucial for obtaining a better quantitative analysis of clinically relevant features of retinal pathology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number041209
JournalJournal of Biomedical Optics
Volume12
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2007

Fingerprint

retinal images
Image acquisition
Optical tomography
Depolarization
Optical Coherence Tomography
Image segmentation
depolarization
Artifacts
acquisition
defocusing
tomography
artifacts
evaluation
reflectance
Imaging techniques
pathology
Pathology
Software
quantitative analysis
computer programs

Keywords

  • Artifacts
  • Image analysis
  • Optical coherence tomography (OCT)
  • Segmentation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Biomaterials
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Clinical Biochemistry

Cite this

Evaluation of potential image acquisition pitfalls during optical coherence tomography and their influence on retinal image segmentation. / Somfai, Gábor Márk; Salinas, Harry M.; Puliafito, Carmen A.; Cabrera DeBuc, Delia.

In: Journal of Biomedical Optics, Vol. 12, No. 4, 041209, 07.2007.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{181d0d299b7844ae9326d193cbb64105,
title = "Evaluation of potential image acquisition pitfalls during optical coherence tomography and their influence on retinal image segmentation",
abstract = "The development of improved segmentation algorithms for more consistently accurate detection of retinal boundaries is a potentially useful solution to the limitations of existing optical coherence tomography (OCT) software. We modeled artifacts related to operator errors that may normally occur during OCT imaging and evaluated their influence on segmentation results using a novel segmentation algorithm. These artifacts included: defocusing, depolarization, decentration, and a combination of defocusing and depolarization. Mean relative reflectance and average thickness of the automatically extracted intraretinal layers was then measured. Our results show that defocusing and depolarization errors together have the greatest altering effect on all measurements and on segmentation accuracy. A marked decrease in mean relative reflectance and average thickness was observed due to depolarization artifact in all intraretinal layers, while defocus resulted in a less-marked decrease. Decentration resulted in a marked but not significant change in average thickness. Our study demonstrates that care must be taken for good-quality imaging when measurements of intraretinal layers using the novel algorithm are planned in future studies. An awareness of these pitfalls and their possible solutions is crucial for obtaining a better quantitative analysis of clinically relevant features of retinal pathology.",
keywords = "Artifacts, Image analysis, Optical coherence tomography (OCT), Segmentation",
author = "Somfai, {G{\'a}bor M{\'a}rk} and Salinas, {Harry M.} and Puliafito, {Carmen A.} and {Cabrera DeBuc}, Delia",
year = "2007",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1117/1.2774827",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
journal = "Journal of Biomedical Optics",
issn = "1083-3668",
publisher = "SPIE",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of potential image acquisition pitfalls during optical coherence tomography and their influence on retinal image segmentation

AU - Somfai, Gábor Márk

AU - Salinas, Harry M.

AU - Puliafito, Carmen A.

AU - Cabrera DeBuc, Delia

PY - 2007/7

Y1 - 2007/7

N2 - The development of improved segmentation algorithms for more consistently accurate detection of retinal boundaries is a potentially useful solution to the limitations of existing optical coherence tomography (OCT) software. We modeled artifacts related to operator errors that may normally occur during OCT imaging and evaluated their influence on segmentation results using a novel segmentation algorithm. These artifacts included: defocusing, depolarization, decentration, and a combination of defocusing and depolarization. Mean relative reflectance and average thickness of the automatically extracted intraretinal layers was then measured. Our results show that defocusing and depolarization errors together have the greatest altering effect on all measurements and on segmentation accuracy. A marked decrease in mean relative reflectance and average thickness was observed due to depolarization artifact in all intraretinal layers, while defocus resulted in a less-marked decrease. Decentration resulted in a marked but not significant change in average thickness. Our study demonstrates that care must be taken for good-quality imaging when measurements of intraretinal layers using the novel algorithm are planned in future studies. An awareness of these pitfalls and their possible solutions is crucial for obtaining a better quantitative analysis of clinically relevant features of retinal pathology.

AB - The development of improved segmentation algorithms for more consistently accurate detection of retinal boundaries is a potentially useful solution to the limitations of existing optical coherence tomography (OCT) software. We modeled artifacts related to operator errors that may normally occur during OCT imaging and evaluated their influence on segmentation results using a novel segmentation algorithm. These artifacts included: defocusing, depolarization, decentration, and a combination of defocusing and depolarization. Mean relative reflectance and average thickness of the automatically extracted intraretinal layers was then measured. Our results show that defocusing and depolarization errors together have the greatest altering effect on all measurements and on segmentation accuracy. A marked decrease in mean relative reflectance and average thickness was observed due to depolarization artifact in all intraretinal layers, while defocus resulted in a less-marked decrease. Decentration resulted in a marked but not significant change in average thickness. Our study demonstrates that care must be taken for good-quality imaging when measurements of intraretinal layers using the novel algorithm are planned in future studies. An awareness of these pitfalls and their possible solutions is crucial for obtaining a better quantitative analysis of clinically relevant features of retinal pathology.

KW - Artifacts

KW - Image analysis

KW - Optical coherence tomography (OCT)

KW - Segmentation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35948948291&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35948948291&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1117/1.2774827

DO - 10.1117/1.2774827

M3 - Article

C2 - 17867798

AN - SCOPUS:35948948291

VL - 12

JO - Journal of Biomedical Optics

JF - Journal of Biomedical Optics

SN - 1083-3668

IS - 4

M1 - 041209

ER -