Evaluation of evaporation-pan networks

David A. Chin, Sifang Zhao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A methodology to assess the relative merits of using evaporation-pan networks and semiempirical functions to estimate reference-crop evapotranspiration (ET) is presented. Estimation-error variance is proposed as a basis for comparison. In the case of pan networks, ordinary kriging and universal kriging are viable options for determining estimation-error variance. In the case of semiempirical ET functions, a formulation is developed that expresses the estimation-error variance in terms of the uncertainties in extrapolating meteorological data from measurement locations. The proposed methodology is demonstrated within a 44,000 km2 area of southern Florida. The results show that universal kriging is the preferred method for estimating reference-crop ET from pan measurements, and the Penman-Monteith method is the preferred estimation method from meteorological data. The pan-based universal kriging approach yields a lower estimation-error variance than the Penman-Monteith function, indicating that pan-based estimates of reference-crop evapotranspiration are preferable to semiempirical evapotranspiration functions in south Florida.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)338-346
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume121
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 1995

Fingerprint

Evapotranspiration
Spatial Analysis
evapotranspiration
kriging
evaporation
Evaporation
Error analysis
Crops
meteorological data
crop
crops
methodology
Uncertainty
estimation method
uncertainty
evaluation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)
  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

Evaluation of evaporation-pan networks. / Chin, David A.; Zhao, Sifang.

In: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, Vol. 121, No. 5, 01.09.1995, p. 338-346.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7030efa3467046b5bd8f300bcbb3a437,
title = "Evaluation of evaporation-pan networks",
abstract = "A methodology to assess the relative merits of using evaporation-pan networks and semiempirical functions to estimate reference-crop evapotranspiration (ET) is presented. Estimation-error variance is proposed as a basis for comparison. In the case of pan networks, ordinary kriging and universal kriging are viable options for determining estimation-error variance. In the case of semiempirical ET functions, a formulation is developed that expresses the estimation-error variance in terms of the uncertainties in extrapolating meteorological data from measurement locations. The proposed methodology is demonstrated within a 44,000 km2 area of southern Florida. The results show that universal kriging is the preferred method for estimating reference-crop ET from pan measurements, and the Penman-Monteith method is the preferred estimation method from meteorological data. The pan-based universal kriging approach yields a lower estimation-error variance than the Penman-Monteith function, indicating that pan-based estimates of reference-crop evapotranspiration are preferable to semiempirical evapotranspiration functions in south Florida.",
author = "Chin, {David A.} and Sifang Zhao",
year = "1995",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1995)121:5(338)",
language = "English",
volume = "121",
pages = "338--346",
journal = "Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering",
issn = "0733-9437",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of evaporation-pan networks

AU - Chin, David A.

AU - Zhao, Sifang

PY - 1995/9/1

Y1 - 1995/9/1

N2 - A methodology to assess the relative merits of using evaporation-pan networks and semiempirical functions to estimate reference-crop evapotranspiration (ET) is presented. Estimation-error variance is proposed as a basis for comparison. In the case of pan networks, ordinary kriging and universal kriging are viable options for determining estimation-error variance. In the case of semiempirical ET functions, a formulation is developed that expresses the estimation-error variance in terms of the uncertainties in extrapolating meteorological data from measurement locations. The proposed methodology is demonstrated within a 44,000 km2 area of southern Florida. The results show that universal kriging is the preferred method for estimating reference-crop ET from pan measurements, and the Penman-Monteith method is the preferred estimation method from meteorological data. The pan-based universal kriging approach yields a lower estimation-error variance than the Penman-Monteith function, indicating that pan-based estimates of reference-crop evapotranspiration are preferable to semiempirical evapotranspiration functions in south Florida.

AB - A methodology to assess the relative merits of using evaporation-pan networks and semiempirical functions to estimate reference-crop evapotranspiration (ET) is presented. Estimation-error variance is proposed as a basis for comparison. In the case of pan networks, ordinary kriging and universal kriging are viable options for determining estimation-error variance. In the case of semiempirical ET functions, a formulation is developed that expresses the estimation-error variance in terms of the uncertainties in extrapolating meteorological data from measurement locations. The proposed methodology is demonstrated within a 44,000 km2 area of southern Florida. The results show that universal kriging is the preferred method for estimating reference-crop ET from pan measurements, and the Penman-Monteith method is the preferred estimation method from meteorological data. The pan-based universal kriging approach yields a lower estimation-error variance than the Penman-Monteith function, indicating that pan-based estimates of reference-crop evapotranspiration are preferable to semiempirical evapotranspiration functions in south Florida.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029373598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029373598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1995)121:5(338)

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1995)121:5(338)

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0029373598

VL - 121

SP - 338

EP - 346

JO - Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering

JF - Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering

SN - 0733-9437

IS - 5

ER -