Evaluation of control strategies in a complex space-vehicle control task

Effects of training type

Ravindra S. Goonetilleke, Colin G. Drury, Joseph Sharit

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The fundamental differences in operator control strategies in a complex task were evaluated in two training scenarios: in-the-loop training and out-of-the-loop training. Verbal protocols and performance measures revealed four types of complex control mechanisms dependent upon these two training approaches. The four types were display based control, open loop input control, closed loop input control, and an input-display control mix. Performance differences favored in-the-loop training, and led to the development of an open loop input control strategy. The overall results indicate that performance improvements may be achieved with operator training on the system dynamics and optimization aspects rather than operator training directed only at the optimization aspects. A "sitting by Nellie" approach such as watching an expert or watching an algorithm perform a task may be disastrous if the system dynamics are poorly understood. This study also suggests how operator strategies can be effectively used to design user-friendly aids which improve operator performance in complex control tasks.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)311-316
Number of pages6
JournalAdvances in Human Factors/Ergonomics
Volume20
Issue numberB
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

evaluation
performance
Mathematical operators
Dynamical systems
Display devices
expert
scenario

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics

Cite this

Evaluation of control strategies in a complex space-vehicle control task : Effects of training type. / Goonetilleke, Ravindra S.; Drury, Colin G.; Sharit, Joseph.

In: Advances in Human Factors/Ergonomics, Vol. 20, No. B, 01.12.1995, p. 311-316.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{31fd3a4bb771419da08db76d11b89e5b,
title = "Evaluation of control strategies in a complex space-vehicle control task: Effects of training type",
abstract = "The fundamental differences in operator control strategies in a complex task were evaluated in two training scenarios: in-the-loop training and out-of-the-loop training. Verbal protocols and performance measures revealed four types of complex control mechanisms dependent upon these two training approaches. The four types were display based control, open loop input control, closed loop input control, and an input-display control mix. Performance differences favored in-the-loop training, and led to the development of an open loop input control strategy. The overall results indicate that performance improvements may be achieved with operator training on the system dynamics and optimization aspects rather than operator training directed only at the optimization aspects. A {"}sitting by Nellie{"} approach such as watching an expert or watching an algorithm perform a task may be disastrous if the system dynamics are poorly understood. This study also suggests how operator strategies can be effectively used to design user-friendly aids which improve operator performance in complex control tasks.",
author = "Goonetilleke, {Ravindra S.} and Drury, {Colin G.} and Joseph Sharit",
year = "1995",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0921-2647(06)80235-2",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "311--316",
journal = "Advances in Human Factors/Ergonomics",
issn = "0921-2647",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "B",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of control strategies in a complex space-vehicle control task

T2 - Effects of training type

AU - Goonetilleke, Ravindra S.

AU - Drury, Colin G.

AU - Sharit, Joseph

PY - 1995/12/1

Y1 - 1995/12/1

N2 - The fundamental differences in operator control strategies in a complex task were evaluated in two training scenarios: in-the-loop training and out-of-the-loop training. Verbal protocols and performance measures revealed four types of complex control mechanisms dependent upon these two training approaches. The four types were display based control, open loop input control, closed loop input control, and an input-display control mix. Performance differences favored in-the-loop training, and led to the development of an open loop input control strategy. The overall results indicate that performance improvements may be achieved with operator training on the system dynamics and optimization aspects rather than operator training directed only at the optimization aspects. A "sitting by Nellie" approach such as watching an expert or watching an algorithm perform a task may be disastrous if the system dynamics are poorly understood. This study also suggests how operator strategies can be effectively used to design user-friendly aids which improve operator performance in complex control tasks.

AB - The fundamental differences in operator control strategies in a complex task were evaluated in two training scenarios: in-the-loop training and out-of-the-loop training. Verbal protocols and performance measures revealed four types of complex control mechanisms dependent upon these two training approaches. The four types were display based control, open loop input control, closed loop input control, and an input-display control mix. Performance differences favored in-the-loop training, and led to the development of an open loop input control strategy. The overall results indicate that performance improvements may be achieved with operator training on the system dynamics and optimization aspects rather than operator training directed only at the optimization aspects. A "sitting by Nellie" approach such as watching an expert or watching an algorithm perform a task may be disastrous if the system dynamics are poorly understood. This study also suggests how operator strategies can be effectively used to design user-friendly aids which improve operator performance in complex control tasks.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=30044433524&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=30044433524&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0921-2647(06)80235-2

DO - 10.1016/S0921-2647(06)80235-2

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 311

EP - 316

JO - Advances in Human Factors/Ergonomics

JF - Advances in Human Factors/Ergonomics

SN - 0921-2647

IS - B

ER -