Evaluation of clinical chemistry laboratory performance in 20 Veterans Administration Hospitals

Bernard W Steele, M. K. Schauble, J. M. Becktel, J. E. Bearman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Twenty highly automated Veterans Administration (VA) Hospital laboratories participated in a study to evaluate their performances of routine chemistry tests. Ten of the laboratories had been identified as 'superior' on the basis of previous College of American Pathologists Surveys. Several aspects of proficiency surveys were simultaneously examined: use of masked vs. unmasked survey specimens, methods of ranking, and comparison of medically useful performance criteria. The laboratories were found in general to be performing at the level of the state of the art and, more importantly, realistically meeting the criteria for medical needs for most routine levels. There was no difference between results obtained with masked and unmasked specimens. The ten 'superior' laboratories showed slightly greater precision than the others, but were not more accurate, and two of them performed very poorly in the present study. The sum of squared SDI's was found to be a helpful technic for ranking and identifying outstanding and poor performances.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)594-602
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology
Volume67
Issue number6
StatePublished - Dec 1 1977
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Veterans Hospitals
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Clinical Chemistry
Hospital Laboratories
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cite this

Steele, B. W., Schauble, M. K., Becktel, J. M., & Bearman, J. E. (1977). Evaluation of clinical chemistry laboratory performance in 20 Veterans Administration Hospitals. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 67(6), 594-602.

Evaluation of clinical chemistry laboratory performance in 20 Veterans Administration Hospitals. / Steele, Bernard W; Schauble, M. K.; Becktel, J. M.; Bearman, J. E.

In: American Journal of Clinical Pathology, Vol. 67, No. 6, 01.12.1977, p. 594-602.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Steele, BW, Schauble, MK, Becktel, JM & Bearman, JE 1977, 'Evaluation of clinical chemistry laboratory performance in 20 Veterans Administration Hospitals', American Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 594-602.
Steele, Bernard W ; Schauble, M. K. ; Becktel, J. M. ; Bearman, J. E. / Evaluation of clinical chemistry laboratory performance in 20 Veterans Administration Hospitals. In: American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 1977 ; Vol. 67, No. 6. pp. 594-602.
@article{46f44b3b000948f48a909e0e23831071,
title = "Evaluation of clinical chemistry laboratory performance in 20 Veterans Administration Hospitals",
abstract = "Twenty highly automated Veterans Administration (VA) Hospital laboratories participated in a study to evaluate their performances of routine chemistry tests. Ten of the laboratories had been identified as 'superior' on the basis of previous College of American Pathologists Surveys. Several aspects of proficiency surveys were simultaneously examined: use of masked vs. unmasked survey specimens, methods of ranking, and comparison of medically useful performance criteria. The laboratories were found in general to be performing at the level of the state of the art and, more importantly, realistically meeting the criteria for medical needs for most routine levels. There was no difference between results obtained with masked and unmasked specimens. The ten 'superior' laboratories showed slightly greater precision than the others, but were not more accurate, and two of them performed very poorly in the present study. The sum of squared SDI's was found to be a helpful technic for ranking and identifying outstanding and poor performances.",
author = "Steele, {Bernard W} and Schauble, {M. K.} and Becktel, {J. M.} and Bearman, {J. E.}",
year = "1977",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
pages = "594--602",
journal = "American Journal of Clinical Pathology",
issn = "0002-9173",
publisher = "American Society of Clinical Pathologists",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of clinical chemistry laboratory performance in 20 Veterans Administration Hospitals

AU - Steele, Bernard W

AU - Schauble, M. K.

AU - Becktel, J. M.

AU - Bearman, J. E.

PY - 1977/12/1

Y1 - 1977/12/1

N2 - Twenty highly automated Veterans Administration (VA) Hospital laboratories participated in a study to evaluate their performances of routine chemistry tests. Ten of the laboratories had been identified as 'superior' on the basis of previous College of American Pathologists Surveys. Several aspects of proficiency surveys were simultaneously examined: use of masked vs. unmasked survey specimens, methods of ranking, and comparison of medically useful performance criteria. The laboratories were found in general to be performing at the level of the state of the art and, more importantly, realistically meeting the criteria for medical needs for most routine levels. There was no difference between results obtained with masked and unmasked specimens. The ten 'superior' laboratories showed slightly greater precision than the others, but were not more accurate, and two of them performed very poorly in the present study. The sum of squared SDI's was found to be a helpful technic for ranking and identifying outstanding and poor performances.

AB - Twenty highly automated Veterans Administration (VA) Hospital laboratories participated in a study to evaluate their performances of routine chemistry tests. Ten of the laboratories had been identified as 'superior' on the basis of previous College of American Pathologists Surveys. Several aspects of proficiency surveys were simultaneously examined: use of masked vs. unmasked survey specimens, methods of ranking, and comparison of medically useful performance criteria. The laboratories were found in general to be performing at the level of the state of the art and, more importantly, realistically meeting the criteria for medical needs for most routine levels. There was no difference between results obtained with masked and unmasked specimens. The ten 'superior' laboratories showed slightly greater precision than the others, but were not more accurate, and two of them performed very poorly in the present study. The sum of squared SDI's was found to be a helpful technic for ranking and identifying outstanding and poor performances.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0017688157&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0017688157&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 868798

AN - SCOPUS:0017688157

VL - 67

SP - 594

EP - 602

JO - American Journal of Clinical Pathology

JF - American Journal of Clinical Pathology

SN - 0002-9173

IS - 6

ER -