Evaluating Collaboration for Effectiveness: Conceptualization and Measurement

Lydia I. Marek, Donna Jean P Brock, Jyoti Savla

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although collaboration is recognized as an effective means to address multifaceted community issues, successful collaboration is difficult to achieve and failure is prevalent. To effectively collaborate, collaborators must recognize the strengths and weaknesses within their own efforts. Using Mattessich and colleagues’ work as a springboard, a seven-factor model of effective collaboration is presented along with an accompanying evaluation tool, the Collaboration Assessment Tool (CAT). Confirmatory factor analysis of the CAT validated the proposed model with all seven collaboration factors demonstrating strong internal consistency. Concurrent validity was established through expected positive intercorrelations between the factors as well as strong positive correlations with the perceived success of collaborative efforts. As evaluators are increasingly asked to evaluate collaborations and coalitions, this conceptual model and tool can provide evaluators with a grounded, reliable, and valid assessment instrument to work with clients to build collaborative efforts in an intentional, comprehensive, and effective manner.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)67-85
Number of pages19
JournalAmerican Journal of Evaluation
Volume36
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 24 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Statistical Factor Analysis
Conceptualization
coalition
factor analysis
evaluation
community

Keywords

  • coalitions
  • collaboration
  • community
  • evaluation
  • measurement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Strategy and Management
  • Social Psychology
  • Education
  • Health(social science)
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Evaluating Collaboration for Effectiveness : Conceptualization and Measurement. / Marek, Lydia I.; Brock, Donna Jean P; Savla, Jyoti.

In: American Journal of Evaluation, Vol. 36, No. 1, 24.03.2015, p. 67-85.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Marek, Lydia I. ; Brock, Donna Jean P ; Savla, Jyoti. / Evaluating Collaboration for Effectiveness : Conceptualization and Measurement. In: American Journal of Evaluation. 2015 ; Vol. 36, No. 1. pp. 67-85.
@article{3e4b4195f5ad47898c3fc085a98682bf,
title = "Evaluating Collaboration for Effectiveness: Conceptualization and Measurement",
abstract = "Although collaboration is recognized as an effective means to address multifaceted community issues, successful collaboration is difficult to achieve and failure is prevalent. To effectively collaborate, collaborators must recognize the strengths and weaknesses within their own efforts. Using Mattessich and colleagues’ work as a springboard, a seven-factor model of effective collaboration is presented along with an accompanying evaluation tool, the Collaboration Assessment Tool (CAT). Confirmatory factor analysis of the CAT validated the proposed model with all seven collaboration factors demonstrating strong internal consistency. Concurrent validity was established through expected positive intercorrelations between the factors as well as strong positive correlations with the perceived success of collaborative efforts. As evaluators are increasingly asked to evaluate collaborations and coalitions, this conceptual model and tool can provide evaluators with a grounded, reliable, and valid assessment instrument to work with clients to build collaborative efforts in an intentional, comprehensive, and effective manner.",
keywords = "coalitions, collaboration, community, evaluation, measurement",
author = "Marek, {Lydia I.} and Brock, {Donna Jean P} and Jyoti Savla",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1177/1098214014531068",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "67--85",
journal = "American Journal of Evaluation",
issn = "1098-2140",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating Collaboration for Effectiveness

T2 - Conceptualization and Measurement

AU - Marek, Lydia I.

AU - Brock, Donna Jean P

AU - Savla, Jyoti

PY - 2015/3/24

Y1 - 2015/3/24

N2 - Although collaboration is recognized as an effective means to address multifaceted community issues, successful collaboration is difficult to achieve and failure is prevalent. To effectively collaborate, collaborators must recognize the strengths and weaknesses within their own efforts. Using Mattessich and colleagues’ work as a springboard, a seven-factor model of effective collaboration is presented along with an accompanying evaluation tool, the Collaboration Assessment Tool (CAT). Confirmatory factor analysis of the CAT validated the proposed model with all seven collaboration factors demonstrating strong internal consistency. Concurrent validity was established through expected positive intercorrelations between the factors as well as strong positive correlations with the perceived success of collaborative efforts. As evaluators are increasingly asked to evaluate collaborations and coalitions, this conceptual model and tool can provide evaluators with a grounded, reliable, and valid assessment instrument to work with clients to build collaborative efforts in an intentional, comprehensive, and effective manner.

AB - Although collaboration is recognized as an effective means to address multifaceted community issues, successful collaboration is difficult to achieve and failure is prevalent. To effectively collaborate, collaborators must recognize the strengths and weaknesses within their own efforts. Using Mattessich and colleagues’ work as a springboard, a seven-factor model of effective collaboration is presented along with an accompanying evaluation tool, the Collaboration Assessment Tool (CAT). Confirmatory factor analysis of the CAT validated the proposed model with all seven collaboration factors demonstrating strong internal consistency. Concurrent validity was established through expected positive intercorrelations between the factors as well as strong positive correlations with the perceived success of collaborative efforts. As evaluators are increasingly asked to evaluate collaborations and coalitions, this conceptual model and tool can provide evaluators with a grounded, reliable, and valid assessment instrument to work with clients to build collaborative efforts in an intentional, comprehensive, and effective manner.

KW - coalitions

KW - collaboration

KW - community

KW - evaluation

KW - measurement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923225426&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923225426&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1098214014531068

DO - 10.1177/1098214014531068

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84923225426

VL - 36

SP - 67

EP - 85

JO - American Journal of Evaluation

JF - American Journal of Evaluation

SN - 1098-2140

IS - 1

ER -