Euxyl K 400

Incidence of sensitization, patch test concentration and vehicle

Antonella Tosti, C. Vincenzi, P. Trevisi, L. Guerra

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

61 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to verify the most suitable vehicle and concentration for testing Euxyl K 400 and its individual ingredients, and to evaluate the prevalence of sensitization to this preservative over the years in Italy. From January 1991 to October 1994, Euxyl K 400 2.5% pet. was positive in 99 patients (35 male, 64 female) out of 3455 (2.8%). Of these, 22 out of 855 patients had a positive reaction during 1991 (2.6%), 29 out of 1037 in 1992 (2.8%), 28 out of 858 in 1993 (3.3%), and 20 out of 705 in 1994 (2.8%). 51 of the 99 patients with a reaction to Euxyl K 400 2.5% pet. showed a positive reaction to dibromodicyanobutane 0.5% pet. and 2 to phenoxyethanol 5% pet. The results of patch testing with serial dilutions of Euxyl K 400 in different vehicles indicate that water is a good vehicle for testing the preservative. However, since Euxyl K 400 is only hydrosoluble to a limited extent, the maximum concentration that can be tested using water is 0.5%, and so with this concentration about 40% of sensitized patients are missed. The results of patch testing with serial dilutions of Euxyl K 400 in petrolatum demonstrate that concentrations lower than 2.5% are not suitable for detection of all sensitized patients. Euxyl K 400 in ethanol frequently causes irritant reactions without offering significant advantages in detecting sensitized patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)193-195
Number of pages3
JournalContact Dermatitis
Volume33
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 15 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Patch Tests
Pets
Incidence
Testing
Dilution
Petrolatum
Water
Irritants
1,2-dibromo-2,4-dicyanobutane
Italy
Ethanol

Keywords

  • 1,2-dibromo-2,4-dicyanobutane
  • 2-phenoxyethanol
  • Cosmetics
  • Methyldibromoglutaronitrile
  • Patch testing technique
  • Preservatives
  • Use test

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dermatology
  • Toxicology
  • Immunology

Cite this

Euxyl K 400 : Incidence of sensitization, patch test concentration and vehicle. / Tosti, Antonella; Vincenzi, C.; Trevisi, P.; Guerra, L.

In: Contact Dermatitis, Vol. 33, No. 3, 15.09.1995, p. 193-195.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tosti, Antonella ; Vincenzi, C. ; Trevisi, P. ; Guerra, L. / Euxyl K 400 : Incidence of sensitization, patch test concentration and vehicle. In: Contact Dermatitis. 1995 ; Vol. 33, No. 3. pp. 193-195.
@article{1dfd9ebad07f466f9438a67d8c21c665,
title = "Euxyl K 400: Incidence of sensitization, patch test concentration and vehicle",
abstract = "The aim of this study was to verify the most suitable vehicle and concentration for testing Euxyl K 400 and its individual ingredients, and to evaluate the prevalence of sensitization to this preservative over the years in Italy. From January 1991 to October 1994, Euxyl K 400 2.5{\%} pet. was positive in 99 patients (35 male, 64 female) out of 3455 (2.8{\%}). Of these, 22 out of 855 patients had a positive reaction during 1991 (2.6{\%}), 29 out of 1037 in 1992 (2.8{\%}), 28 out of 858 in 1993 (3.3{\%}), and 20 out of 705 in 1994 (2.8{\%}). 51 of the 99 patients with a reaction to Euxyl K 400 2.5{\%} pet. showed a positive reaction to dibromodicyanobutane 0.5{\%} pet. and 2 to phenoxyethanol 5{\%} pet. The results of patch testing with serial dilutions of Euxyl K 400 in different vehicles indicate that water is a good vehicle for testing the preservative. However, since Euxyl K 400 is only hydrosoluble to a limited extent, the maximum concentration that can be tested using water is 0.5{\%}, and so with this concentration about 40{\%} of sensitized patients are missed. The results of patch testing with serial dilutions of Euxyl K 400 in petrolatum demonstrate that concentrations lower than 2.5{\%} are not suitable for detection of all sensitized patients. Euxyl K 400 in ethanol frequently causes irritant reactions without offering significant advantages in detecting sensitized patients.",
keywords = "1,2-dibromo-2,4-dicyanobutane, 2-phenoxyethanol, Cosmetics, Methyldibromoglutaronitrile, Patch testing technique, Preservatives, Use test",
author = "Antonella Tosti and C. Vincenzi and P. Trevisi and L. Guerra",
year = "1995",
month = "9",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1111/j.1600-0536.1995.tb00544.x",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "193--195",
journal = "Contact Dermatitis",
issn = "0105-1873",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Euxyl K 400

T2 - Incidence of sensitization, patch test concentration and vehicle

AU - Tosti, Antonella

AU - Vincenzi, C.

AU - Trevisi, P.

AU - Guerra, L.

PY - 1995/9/15

Y1 - 1995/9/15

N2 - The aim of this study was to verify the most suitable vehicle and concentration for testing Euxyl K 400 and its individual ingredients, and to evaluate the prevalence of sensitization to this preservative over the years in Italy. From January 1991 to October 1994, Euxyl K 400 2.5% pet. was positive in 99 patients (35 male, 64 female) out of 3455 (2.8%). Of these, 22 out of 855 patients had a positive reaction during 1991 (2.6%), 29 out of 1037 in 1992 (2.8%), 28 out of 858 in 1993 (3.3%), and 20 out of 705 in 1994 (2.8%). 51 of the 99 patients with a reaction to Euxyl K 400 2.5% pet. showed a positive reaction to dibromodicyanobutane 0.5% pet. and 2 to phenoxyethanol 5% pet. The results of patch testing with serial dilutions of Euxyl K 400 in different vehicles indicate that water is a good vehicle for testing the preservative. However, since Euxyl K 400 is only hydrosoluble to a limited extent, the maximum concentration that can be tested using water is 0.5%, and so with this concentration about 40% of sensitized patients are missed. The results of patch testing with serial dilutions of Euxyl K 400 in petrolatum demonstrate that concentrations lower than 2.5% are not suitable for detection of all sensitized patients. Euxyl K 400 in ethanol frequently causes irritant reactions without offering significant advantages in detecting sensitized patients.

AB - The aim of this study was to verify the most suitable vehicle and concentration for testing Euxyl K 400 and its individual ingredients, and to evaluate the prevalence of sensitization to this preservative over the years in Italy. From January 1991 to October 1994, Euxyl K 400 2.5% pet. was positive in 99 patients (35 male, 64 female) out of 3455 (2.8%). Of these, 22 out of 855 patients had a positive reaction during 1991 (2.6%), 29 out of 1037 in 1992 (2.8%), 28 out of 858 in 1993 (3.3%), and 20 out of 705 in 1994 (2.8%). 51 of the 99 patients with a reaction to Euxyl K 400 2.5% pet. showed a positive reaction to dibromodicyanobutane 0.5% pet. and 2 to phenoxyethanol 5% pet. The results of patch testing with serial dilutions of Euxyl K 400 in different vehicles indicate that water is a good vehicle for testing the preservative. However, since Euxyl K 400 is only hydrosoluble to a limited extent, the maximum concentration that can be tested using water is 0.5%, and so with this concentration about 40% of sensitized patients are missed. The results of patch testing with serial dilutions of Euxyl K 400 in petrolatum demonstrate that concentrations lower than 2.5% are not suitable for detection of all sensitized patients. Euxyl K 400 in ethanol frequently causes irritant reactions without offering significant advantages in detecting sensitized patients.

KW - 1,2-dibromo-2,4-dicyanobutane

KW - 2-phenoxyethanol

KW - Cosmetics

KW - Methyldibromoglutaronitrile

KW - Patch testing technique

KW - Preservatives

KW - Use test

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029021331&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029021331&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1995.tb00544.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1995.tb00544.x

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 193

EP - 195

JO - Contact Dermatitis

JF - Contact Dermatitis

SN - 0105-1873

IS - 3

ER -