Ethnoracial differences in anxiety sensitivity: Examining the validity of competing anxiety sensitivity index subscales

Lora Rose Hunter, Meghan E. Keough, Kiara R Timpano, Norman B. Schmidt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite the increasing number of Americans who are considered to be a part of an ethnoracial minority group, there have been few investigations of the cross-cultural validity of measures of psychopathology. The limited existing literature suggests potential differences between African American (AA) and European American (EA) individuals with respect to the utility of self-report measures, including anxiety sensitivity. Physical, mental, and social domains of anxiety sensitivity are measured using subscales derived from a 3-factor model reported in EA samples despite evidence suggesting that anxiety sensitivity in AA samples is characterized by more distinct physical concerns. The current study compared the concurrent and predictive validity of the traditional anxiety sensitivity subscales representing 3 domains and a 4-subscale formulation based on predictions about the construct in AA samples. Comparisons of both AA (N = 41) and EA (N= 298) samples are included. Findings suggest some ethnoracial group differences in the concurrent and predictive validity of anxiety sensitivity subscales, specifically supporting the appropriateness and specificity of the 4-factor model of anxiety sensitivity in AA samples. Implications are discussed, including identification of sociocultural mechanisms that might influence psychometric properties of measures of anxiety.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)511-516
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Anxiety Disorders
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2012

Fingerprint

Anxiety
African Americans
Minority Groups
Psychopathology
Psychometrics
Self Report
Cohort Studies

Keywords

  • African american
  • Anxiety
  • Race
  • Risk factor

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Ethnoracial differences in anxiety sensitivity : Examining the validity of competing anxiety sensitivity index subscales. / Hunter, Lora Rose; Keough, Meghan E.; Timpano, Kiara R; Schmidt, Norman B.

In: Journal of Anxiety Disorders, Vol. 26, No. 4, 01.05.2012, p. 511-516.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7175c05d83a84505b96f94704a4fac4d,
title = "Ethnoracial differences in anxiety sensitivity: Examining the validity of competing anxiety sensitivity index subscales",
abstract = "Despite the increasing number of Americans who are considered to be a part of an ethnoracial minority group, there have been few investigations of the cross-cultural validity of measures of psychopathology. The limited existing literature suggests potential differences between African American (AA) and European American (EA) individuals with respect to the utility of self-report measures, including anxiety sensitivity. Physical, mental, and social domains of anxiety sensitivity are measured using subscales derived from a 3-factor model reported in EA samples despite evidence suggesting that anxiety sensitivity in AA samples is characterized by more distinct physical concerns. The current study compared the concurrent and predictive validity of the traditional anxiety sensitivity subscales representing 3 domains and a 4-subscale formulation based on predictions about the construct in AA samples. Comparisons of both AA (N = 41) and EA (N= 298) samples are included. Findings suggest some ethnoracial group differences in the concurrent and predictive validity of anxiety sensitivity subscales, specifically supporting the appropriateness and specificity of the 4-factor model of anxiety sensitivity in AA samples. Implications are discussed, including identification of sociocultural mechanisms that might influence psychometric properties of measures of anxiety.",
keywords = "African american, Anxiety, Race, Risk factor",
author = "Hunter, {Lora Rose} and Keough, {Meghan E.} and Timpano, {Kiara R} and Schmidt, {Norman B.}",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.janxdis.2012.02.004",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "511--516",
journal = "Journal of Anxiety Disorders",
issn = "0887-6185",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethnoracial differences in anxiety sensitivity

T2 - Examining the validity of competing anxiety sensitivity index subscales

AU - Hunter, Lora Rose

AU - Keough, Meghan E.

AU - Timpano, Kiara R

AU - Schmidt, Norman B.

PY - 2012/5/1

Y1 - 2012/5/1

N2 - Despite the increasing number of Americans who are considered to be a part of an ethnoracial minority group, there have been few investigations of the cross-cultural validity of measures of psychopathology. The limited existing literature suggests potential differences between African American (AA) and European American (EA) individuals with respect to the utility of self-report measures, including anxiety sensitivity. Physical, mental, and social domains of anxiety sensitivity are measured using subscales derived from a 3-factor model reported in EA samples despite evidence suggesting that anxiety sensitivity in AA samples is characterized by more distinct physical concerns. The current study compared the concurrent and predictive validity of the traditional anxiety sensitivity subscales representing 3 domains and a 4-subscale formulation based on predictions about the construct in AA samples. Comparisons of both AA (N = 41) and EA (N= 298) samples are included. Findings suggest some ethnoracial group differences in the concurrent and predictive validity of anxiety sensitivity subscales, specifically supporting the appropriateness and specificity of the 4-factor model of anxiety sensitivity in AA samples. Implications are discussed, including identification of sociocultural mechanisms that might influence psychometric properties of measures of anxiety.

AB - Despite the increasing number of Americans who are considered to be a part of an ethnoracial minority group, there have been few investigations of the cross-cultural validity of measures of psychopathology. The limited existing literature suggests potential differences between African American (AA) and European American (EA) individuals with respect to the utility of self-report measures, including anxiety sensitivity. Physical, mental, and social domains of anxiety sensitivity are measured using subscales derived from a 3-factor model reported in EA samples despite evidence suggesting that anxiety sensitivity in AA samples is characterized by more distinct physical concerns. The current study compared the concurrent and predictive validity of the traditional anxiety sensitivity subscales representing 3 domains and a 4-subscale formulation based on predictions about the construct in AA samples. Comparisons of both AA (N = 41) and EA (N= 298) samples are included. Findings suggest some ethnoracial group differences in the concurrent and predictive validity of anxiety sensitivity subscales, specifically supporting the appropriateness and specificity of the 4-factor model of anxiety sensitivity in AA samples. Implications are discussed, including identification of sociocultural mechanisms that might influence psychometric properties of measures of anxiety.

KW - African american

KW - Anxiety

KW - Race

KW - Risk factor

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858999479&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84858999479&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.janxdis.2012.02.004

DO - 10.1016/j.janxdis.2012.02.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 22410090

AN - SCOPUS:84858999479

VL - 26

SP - 511

EP - 516

JO - Journal of Anxiety Disorders

JF - Journal of Anxiety Disorders

SN - 0887-6185

IS - 4

ER -