Ethics, information technology, and public health: New challenges for the clinician-patient relationship

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Increasingly widespread adoption of health information technology tools in clinical care increases interest in ethical and legal issues related to the use of these tools for public health and the effects of these uses on the clinician-patient relationship. It is argued that patients, clinicians, and society have generally uncontroversial duties to support civil society's public health mission, information technology supports this mission, and the effects of automated and computerized public health surveillance are likely to have little if any effect on the clinician-patient relationship. It is also suggested, nevertheless, that electronic public health surveillance raises interesting and important ethical issues, some of which can be addressed if not resolved by empirical research, especially regarding patient preferences about secondary use of health data and their moral obligation to contribute to population- based health.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)58-63
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Law, Medicine and Ethics
Volume38
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2010

Fingerprint

Public Health Surveillance
Ethics
Medical Informatics
Public Health
Technology
Moral Obligations
Empirical Research
Patient Preference
Health
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Cite this

@article{da66b7acdc984de187e351f8b5a002d0,
title = "Ethics, information technology, and public health: New challenges for the clinician-patient relationship",
abstract = "Increasingly widespread adoption of health information technology tools in clinical care increases interest in ethical and legal issues related to the use of these tools for public health and the effects of these uses on the clinician-patient relationship. It is argued that patients, clinicians, and society have generally uncontroversial duties to support civil society's public health mission, information technology supports this mission, and the effects of automated and computerized public health surveillance are likely to have little if any effect on the clinician-patient relationship. It is also suggested, nevertheless, that electronic public health surveillance raises interesting and important ethical issues, some of which can be addressed if not resolved by empirical research, especially regarding patient preferences about secondary use of health data and their moral obligation to contribute to population- based health.",
author = "Kenneth Goodman",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1748-720X.2010.00466.x",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "58--63",
journal = "Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics",
issn = "1073-1105",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethics, information technology, and public health

T2 - New challenges for the clinician-patient relationship

AU - Goodman, Kenneth

PY - 2010/3/1

Y1 - 2010/3/1

N2 - Increasingly widespread adoption of health information technology tools in clinical care increases interest in ethical and legal issues related to the use of these tools for public health and the effects of these uses on the clinician-patient relationship. It is argued that patients, clinicians, and society have generally uncontroversial duties to support civil society's public health mission, information technology supports this mission, and the effects of automated and computerized public health surveillance are likely to have little if any effect on the clinician-patient relationship. It is also suggested, nevertheless, that electronic public health surveillance raises interesting and important ethical issues, some of which can be addressed if not resolved by empirical research, especially regarding patient preferences about secondary use of health data and their moral obligation to contribute to population- based health.

AB - Increasingly widespread adoption of health information technology tools in clinical care increases interest in ethical and legal issues related to the use of these tools for public health and the effects of these uses on the clinician-patient relationship. It is argued that patients, clinicians, and society have generally uncontroversial duties to support civil society's public health mission, information technology supports this mission, and the effects of automated and computerized public health surveillance are likely to have little if any effect on the clinician-patient relationship. It is also suggested, nevertheless, that electronic public health surveillance raises interesting and important ethical issues, some of which can be addressed if not resolved by empirical research, especially regarding patient preferences about secondary use of health data and their moral obligation to contribute to population- based health.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952819903&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77952819903&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2010.00466.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2010.00466.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 20446984

AN - SCOPUS:77952819903

VL - 38

SP - 58

EP - 63

JO - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics

JF - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics

SN - 1073-1105

IS - 1

ER -