Ethical issues surrounding multifetal pregnancy reduction and selective termination

M. I. Evans, M. P. Johnson, R. A. Quintero, J. C. Fletcher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

MFPR and selective terminations satisfy the criteria of enabling pregnancies to continue with the least harm and most benefits to all involved.The surviving infants can be saved from certain death (abortion) or higher risks of severe harm and death and of an extended stay in neonatal intensive care (premature delivery).In the hands of trained operators, MFPR and selective termination is, in our opinion, the best means to protect the mother'S health and well-Being, given it is available and approved by the parents.MFPR and selective termination avoid the trauma of abortion of a wanted pregnancy, enable the parents to achieve the goal of having their own child, and avoid the dangers of delivery of multiple premature infants. There is no doubt that any procedure that involves the death of a fetus will be hotly argued despite the potential for greater good.We acknowledge that it will be impossible to convince those who cannot morally accept the taking of any life regardless of the circumstances.We hope, however, that we have shown there is a place for MFPR and selective termination in a very limited number of circumstances and the ethical probity of MFPR and selective termination as an option in such cases.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)437-451
Number of pages15
JournalClinics in Perinatology
Volume23
Issue number3
StatePublished - Sep 30 1996

Fingerprint

Multifetal Pregnancy Reduction
Ethics
Parents
Neonatal Intensive Care
Pregnancy
Premature Infants
Fetus
Mothers
Health
Wounds and Injuries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Evans, M. I., Johnson, M. P., Quintero, R. A., & Fletcher, J. C. (1996). Ethical issues surrounding multifetal pregnancy reduction and selective termination. Clinics in Perinatology, 23(3), 437-451.

Ethical issues surrounding multifetal pregnancy reduction and selective termination. / Evans, M. I.; Johnson, M. P.; Quintero, R. A.; Fletcher, J. C.

In: Clinics in Perinatology, Vol. 23, No. 3, 30.09.1996, p. 437-451.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Evans, MI, Johnson, MP, Quintero, RA & Fletcher, JC 1996, 'Ethical issues surrounding multifetal pregnancy reduction and selective termination', Clinics in Perinatology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 437-451.
Evans MI, Johnson MP, Quintero RA, Fletcher JC. Ethical issues surrounding multifetal pregnancy reduction and selective termination. Clinics in Perinatology. 1996 Sep 30;23(3):437-451.
Evans, M. I. ; Johnson, M. P. ; Quintero, R. A. ; Fletcher, J. C. / Ethical issues surrounding multifetal pregnancy reduction and selective termination. In: Clinics in Perinatology. 1996 ; Vol. 23, No. 3. pp. 437-451.
@article{8f45476d108949d6aa42a7c1072e8ddf,
title = "Ethical issues surrounding multifetal pregnancy reduction and selective termination",
abstract = "MFPR and selective terminations satisfy the criteria of enabling pregnancies to continue with the least harm and most benefits to all involved.The surviving infants can be saved from certain death (abortion) or higher risks of severe harm and death and of an extended stay in neonatal intensive care (premature delivery).In the hands of trained operators, MFPR and selective termination is, in our opinion, the best means to protect the mother'S health and well-Being, given it is available and approved by the parents.MFPR and selective termination avoid the trauma of abortion of a wanted pregnancy, enable the parents to achieve the goal of having their own child, and avoid the dangers of delivery of multiple premature infants. There is no doubt that any procedure that involves the death of a fetus will be hotly argued despite the potential for greater good.We acknowledge that it will be impossible to convince those who cannot morally accept the taking of any life regardless of the circumstances.We hope, however, that we have shown there is a place for MFPR and selective termination in a very limited number of circumstances and the ethical probity of MFPR and selective termination as an option in such cases.",
author = "Evans, {M. I.} and Johnson, {M. P.} and Quintero, {R. A.} and Fletcher, {J. C.}",
year = "1996",
month = "9",
day = "30",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "437--451",
journal = "Clinics in Perinatology",
issn = "0095-5108",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethical issues surrounding multifetal pregnancy reduction and selective termination

AU - Evans, M. I.

AU - Johnson, M. P.

AU - Quintero, R. A.

AU - Fletcher, J. C.

PY - 1996/9/30

Y1 - 1996/9/30

N2 - MFPR and selective terminations satisfy the criteria of enabling pregnancies to continue with the least harm and most benefits to all involved.The surviving infants can be saved from certain death (abortion) or higher risks of severe harm and death and of an extended stay in neonatal intensive care (premature delivery).In the hands of trained operators, MFPR and selective termination is, in our opinion, the best means to protect the mother'S health and well-Being, given it is available and approved by the parents.MFPR and selective termination avoid the trauma of abortion of a wanted pregnancy, enable the parents to achieve the goal of having their own child, and avoid the dangers of delivery of multiple premature infants. There is no doubt that any procedure that involves the death of a fetus will be hotly argued despite the potential for greater good.We acknowledge that it will be impossible to convince those who cannot morally accept the taking of any life regardless of the circumstances.We hope, however, that we have shown there is a place for MFPR and selective termination in a very limited number of circumstances and the ethical probity of MFPR and selective termination as an option in such cases.

AB - MFPR and selective terminations satisfy the criteria of enabling pregnancies to continue with the least harm and most benefits to all involved.The surviving infants can be saved from certain death (abortion) or higher risks of severe harm and death and of an extended stay in neonatal intensive care (premature delivery).In the hands of trained operators, MFPR and selective termination is, in our opinion, the best means to protect the mother'S health and well-Being, given it is available and approved by the parents.MFPR and selective termination avoid the trauma of abortion of a wanted pregnancy, enable the parents to achieve the goal of having their own child, and avoid the dangers of delivery of multiple premature infants. There is no doubt that any procedure that involves the death of a fetus will be hotly argued despite the potential for greater good.We acknowledge that it will be impossible to convince those who cannot morally accept the taking of any life regardless of the circumstances.We hope, however, that we have shown there is a place for MFPR and selective termination in a very limited number of circumstances and the ethical probity of MFPR and selective termination as an option in such cases.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029790719&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029790719&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8884118

AN - SCOPUS:0029790719

VL - 23

SP - 437

EP - 451

JO - Clinics in Perinatology

JF - Clinics in Perinatology

SN - 0095-5108

IS - 3

ER -