Estimating Intracranial Volume in Brain Research: An Evaluation of Methods

Saman Sargolzaei, Arman Sargolzaei, Mercedes Cabrerizo, Gang Chen, Mohammed Goryawala, Alberto Pinzon-Ardila, Sergio M. Gonzalez-Arias, Malek Adjouadi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

26 Scopus citations

Abstract

Intracranial volume (ICV) is a standard measure often used in morphometric analyses to correct for head size in brain studies. Inaccurate ICV estimation could introduce bias in the outcome. The current study provides a decision aid in defining protocols for ICV estimation across different subject groups in terms of sampling frequencies that can be optimally used on the volumetric MRI data, and type of software most suitable for use in estimating the ICV measure. Four groups of 53 subjects are considered, including adult controls (AC, adults with Alzheimer’s disease (AD), pediatric controls (PC) and group of pediatric epilepsy subjects (PE). Reference measurements were calculated for each subject by manually tracing intracranial cavity without sub-sampling. The reliability of reference measurements were assured through intra- and inter- variation analyses. Three publicly well-known software packages (FreeSurfer Ver. 5.3.0, FSL Ver. 5.0, SPM8 and SPM12) were examined in their ability to automatically estimate ICV across the groups. Results on sub-sampling studies with a 95 % confidence showed that in order to keep the accuracy of the inter-leaved slice sampling protocol above 99 %, sampling period cannot exceed 20 mm for AC, 25 mm for PC, 15 mm for AD and 17 mm for the PE groups. The study assumes a priori knowledge about the population under study into the automated ICV estimation. Tuning of the parameters in FSL and the use of proper atlas in SPM showed significant reduction in the systematic bias and the error in ICV estimation via these automated tools. SPM12 with the use of pediatric template is found to be a more suitable candidate for PE group. SPM12 and FSL subjected to tuning are the more appropriate tools for the PC group. The random error is minimized for FS in AD group and SPM8 showed less systematic bias. Across the AC group, both SPM12 and FS performed well but SPM12 reported lesser amount of systematic bias.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)427-441
Number of pages15
JournalNeuroinformatics
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • FreeSurfer (RRID:nif-0000-00304)
  • FSL (RRID:nif-0000-00305)
  • Intracranial volume estimation
  • MRI
  • SPM (RRID:nif-0000-00343)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Software
  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Information Systems

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Estimating Intracranial Volume in Brain Research: An Evaluation of Methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this