Erratum: Coral growth, bioerosion, and secondary accretion of living orbicellid corals from mesophotic reefs in the US Virgin Islands (Mar Ecol Prog Ser (2016) 559(45-63))

D. K. Weinstein, A. Sharifi, J. S. Klaus, T. B. Smith, S. J. Giri, K. P. Helmle

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

To ensure that readers have the most accurate data, the authors would like to correct a number of mistakes made in the original published article. These errors do not change the main results, conclusions, or general concepts of the work. However, the authors feel it is important to correct these issues. • On page 50 in the second paragraph of the section ‘Bioerosion, secondary accretion, and total framework growth’, the term ‘overall site ΔC_’ should include a better explanation that this average is obtained from taking the mean ΔC_ value of only samples where linear extension was directly calculated, not by multiplying the site average linear extension by the site average buoyant weight. As such, the sentence has been rewritten as follows: ‘The sample mean percent area of macroboring and secondary accretion were multiplied by the associated sample ΔC_ (when available) or the overall site average ΔC_, calculated only from samples where direct linear extension calculations were provided.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)215-217
Number of pages3
JournalMarine Ecology Progress Series
Volume619
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Virgin Islands of the United States
bioerosion
corals
reefs
coral
reef
accretion
sampling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Aquatic Science
  • Ecology

Cite this

Erratum : Coral growth, bioerosion, and secondary accretion of living orbicellid corals from mesophotic reefs in the US Virgin Islands (Mar Ecol Prog Ser (2016) 559(45-63)). / Weinstein, D. K.; Sharifi, A.; Klaus, J. S.; Smith, T. B.; Giri, S. J.; Helmle, K. P.

In: Marine Ecology Progress Series, Vol. 619, 01.01.2019, p. 215-217.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

@article{b71b770ab93e4c05a97794ca12fecfdb,
title = "Erratum: Coral growth, bioerosion, and secondary accretion of living orbicellid corals from mesophotic reefs in the US Virgin Islands (Mar Ecol Prog Ser (2016) 559(45-63))",
abstract = "To ensure that readers have the most accurate data, the authors would like to correct a number of mistakes made in the original published article. These errors do not change the main results, conclusions, or general concepts of the work. However, the authors feel it is important to correct these issues. • On page 50 in the second paragraph of the section ‘Bioerosion, secondary accretion, and total framework growth’, the term ‘overall site ΔC_’ should include a better explanation that this average is obtained from taking the mean ΔC_ value of only samples where linear extension was directly calculated, not by multiplying the site average linear extension by the site average buoyant weight. As such, the sentence has been rewritten as follows: ‘The sample mean percent area of macroboring and secondary accretion were multiplied by the associated sample ΔC_ (when available) or the overall site average ΔC_, calculated only from samples where direct linear extension calculations were provided.",
author = "Weinstein, {D. K.} and A. Sharifi and Klaus, {J. S.} and Smith, {T. B.} and Giri, {S. J.} and Helmle, {K. P.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3354/meps11883",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "619",
pages = "215--217",
journal = "Marine Ecology - Progress Series",
issn = "0171-8630",
publisher = "Inter-Research",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Erratum

T2 - Coral growth, bioerosion, and secondary accretion of living orbicellid corals from mesophotic reefs in the US Virgin Islands (Mar Ecol Prog Ser (2016) 559(45-63))

AU - Weinstein, D. K.

AU - Sharifi, A.

AU - Klaus, J. S.

AU - Smith, T. B.

AU - Giri, S. J.

AU - Helmle, K. P.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - To ensure that readers have the most accurate data, the authors would like to correct a number of mistakes made in the original published article. These errors do not change the main results, conclusions, or general concepts of the work. However, the authors feel it is important to correct these issues. • On page 50 in the second paragraph of the section ‘Bioerosion, secondary accretion, and total framework growth’, the term ‘overall site ΔC_’ should include a better explanation that this average is obtained from taking the mean ΔC_ value of only samples where linear extension was directly calculated, not by multiplying the site average linear extension by the site average buoyant weight. As such, the sentence has been rewritten as follows: ‘The sample mean percent area of macroboring and secondary accretion were multiplied by the associated sample ΔC_ (when available) or the overall site average ΔC_, calculated only from samples where direct linear extension calculations were provided.

AB - To ensure that readers have the most accurate data, the authors would like to correct a number of mistakes made in the original published article. These errors do not change the main results, conclusions, or general concepts of the work. However, the authors feel it is important to correct these issues. • On page 50 in the second paragraph of the section ‘Bioerosion, secondary accretion, and total framework growth’, the term ‘overall site ΔC_’ should include a better explanation that this average is obtained from taking the mean ΔC_ value of only samples where linear extension was directly calculated, not by multiplying the site average linear extension by the site average buoyant weight. As such, the sentence has been rewritten as follows: ‘The sample mean percent area of macroboring and secondary accretion were multiplied by the associated sample ΔC_ (when available) or the overall site average ΔC_, calculated only from samples where direct linear extension calculations were provided.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066835713&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066835713&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3354/meps11883

DO - 10.3354/meps11883

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:85066835713

VL - 619

SP - 215

EP - 217

JO - Marine Ecology - Progress Series

JF - Marine Ecology - Progress Series

SN - 0171-8630

ER -