Epistemology in Excess? A Response to Williams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Emma Williams' 'In Excess of Epistemology' admirably endeavours to open the way to an account of critical thinking that goes beyond the one I have defended ad nauseum in recent decades by developing, via the work of Charles Taylor and Martin Heidegger, 'a radically different conception of thinking and the human being who thinks', one that 'does more justice to receptive and responsible conditions of human thought.' In this response I hope to show that much of Williams' alternative approach is compatible with my own; that, where incompatible, the alternative is problematic; and, finally, that there is a risk of talking past one another, talking at cross-purposes, that all sides must work to overcome.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Philosophy of Education
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2016

Fingerprint

epistemology
justice
human being
Excess
Epistemology
Martin Heidegger
Justice
Human Being
Human Thought
Critical Thinking
Charles Taylor
Conception

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • History
  • Philosophy

Cite this

Epistemology in Excess? A Response to Williams. / Siegel, Harvey.

In: Journal of Philosophy of Education, 2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{933554c94bb24a198ca4dc361eea1d9c,
title = "Epistemology in Excess? A Response to Williams",
abstract = "Emma Williams' 'In Excess of Epistemology' admirably endeavours to open the way to an account of critical thinking that goes beyond the one I have defended ad nauseum in recent decades by developing, via the work of Charles Taylor and Martin Heidegger, 'a radically different conception of thinking and the human being who thinks', one that 'does more justice to receptive and responsible conditions of human thought.' In this response I hope to show that much of Williams' alternative approach is compatible with my own; that, where incompatible, the alternative is problematic; and, finally, that there is a risk of talking past one another, talking at cross-purposes, that all sides must work to overcome.",
author = "Harvey Siegel",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1111/1467-9752.12229",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Philosophy of Education",
issn = "0309-8249",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Epistemology in Excess? A Response to Williams

AU - Siegel, Harvey

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Emma Williams' 'In Excess of Epistemology' admirably endeavours to open the way to an account of critical thinking that goes beyond the one I have defended ad nauseum in recent decades by developing, via the work of Charles Taylor and Martin Heidegger, 'a radically different conception of thinking and the human being who thinks', one that 'does more justice to receptive and responsible conditions of human thought.' In this response I hope to show that much of Williams' alternative approach is compatible with my own; that, where incompatible, the alternative is problematic; and, finally, that there is a risk of talking past one another, talking at cross-purposes, that all sides must work to overcome.

AB - Emma Williams' 'In Excess of Epistemology' admirably endeavours to open the way to an account of critical thinking that goes beyond the one I have defended ad nauseum in recent decades by developing, via the work of Charles Taylor and Martin Heidegger, 'a radically different conception of thinking and the human being who thinks', one that 'does more justice to receptive and responsible conditions of human thought.' In this response I hope to show that much of Williams' alternative approach is compatible with my own; that, where incompatible, the alternative is problematic; and, finally, that there is a risk of talking past one another, talking at cross-purposes, that all sides must work to overcome.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85007240652&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85007240652&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1467-9752.12229

DO - 10.1111/1467-9752.12229

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85007240652

JO - Journal of Philosophy of Education

JF - Journal of Philosophy of Education

SN - 0309-8249

ER -