Abstract
In Biro and Siegel (1992) we argued that a theory of argumentation must fully engage the normativity of judgments about arguments, and we developed such a theory. In this paper we further develop and defend our theory.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 277-292 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Argumentation |
Volume | 11 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jan 1 1997 |
Keywords
- Argumentation
- Epistemic normativity
- Epistemology
- Fallacies
- Methodology
- Normativity
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Philosophy
- Linguistics and Language