Epistemic normativity, argumentation, and fallacies

Harvey Siegel, John Biro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In Biro and Siegel (1992) we argued that a theory of argumentation must fully engage the normativity of judgments about arguments, and we developed such a theory. In this paper we further develop and defend our theory.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)277-292
Number of pages16
JournalArgumentation
Volume11
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1997

Fingerprint

normativity
argumentation
Argumentation
Fallacies
Epistemic Normativity
Argumentation Theory
Normativity

Keywords

  • Argumentation
  • Epistemic normativity
  • Epistemology
  • Fallacies
  • Methodology
  • Normativity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Epistemic normativity, argumentation, and fallacies. / Siegel, Harvey; Biro, John.

In: Argumentation, Vol. 11, No. 3, 1997, p. 277-292.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Siegel, H & Biro, J 1997, 'Epistemic normativity, argumentation, and fallacies', Argumentation, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 277-292.
Siegel, Harvey ; Biro, John. / Epistemic normativity, argumentation, and fallacies. In: Argumentation. 1997 ; Vol. 11, No. 3. pp. 277-292.
@article{bb19e1a974a74beaa969d80ef98d6cd6,
title = "Epistemic normativity, argumentation, and fallacies",
abstract = "In Biro and Siegel (1992) we argued that a theory of argumentation must fully engage the normativity of judgments about arguments, and we developed such a theory. In this paper we further develop and defend our theory.",
keywords = "Argumentation, Epistemic normativity, Epistemology, Fallacies, Methodology, Normativity",
author = "Harvey Siegel and John Biro",
year = "1997",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "277--292",
journal = "Argumentation",
issn = "0920-427X",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Epistemic normativity, argumentation, and fallacies

AU - Siegel, Harvey

AU - Biro, John

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - In Biro and Siegel (1992) we argued that a theory of argumentation must fully engage the normativity of judgments about arguments, and we developed such a theory. In this paper we further develop and defend our theory.

AB - In Biro and Siegel (1992) we argued that a theory of argumentation must fully engage the normativity of judgments about arguments, and we developed such a theory. In this paper we further develop and defend our theory.

KW - Argumentation

KW - Epistemic normativity

KW - Epistemology

KW - Fallacies

KW - Methodology

KW - Normativity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646198380&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646198380&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33646198380

VL - 11

SP - 277

EP - 292

JO - Argumentation

JF - Argumentation

SN - 0920-427X

IS - 3

ER -