Abstract
In Biro and Siegel (1992) we argued that a theory of argumentation must fully engage the normativity of judgments about arguments, and we developed such a theory. In this paper we further develop and defend our theory.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 277-292 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Argumentation |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1 1997 |
Keywords
- Argumentation
- Epistemic normativity
- Epistemology
- Fallacies
- Methodology
- Normativity
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Philosophy
- Linguistics and Language
Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Epistemic normativity, argumentation, and fallacies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Cite this
Siegel, H., & Biro, J. (1997). Epistemic normativity, argumentation, and fallacies. Argumentation, 11(3), 277-292. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007799325361