Epistemic normativity, argumentation, and fallacies

Harvey Siegel, John Biro

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

32 Scopus citations


In Biro and Siegel (1992) we argued that a theory of argumentation must fully engage the normativity of judgments about arguments, and we developed such a theory. In this paper we further develop and defend our theory.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)277-292
Number of pages16
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jan 1 1997


  • Argumentation
  • Epistemic normativity
  • Epistemology
  • Fallacies
  • Methodology
  • Normativity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • Linguistics and Language

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Epistemic normativity, argumentation, and fallacies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this