Abstract
In Biro and Siegel (1992) we argued that a theory of argumentation must fully engage the normativity of judgments about arguments, and we developed such a theory. In this paper we further develop and defend our theory.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 277-292 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Argumentation |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| State | Published - 1997 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Argumentation
- Epistemic normativity
- Epistemology
- Fallacies
- Methodology
- Normativity
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Philosophy
- Linguistics and Language
Cite this
Epistemic normativity, argumentation, and fallacies. / Siegel, Harvey; Biro, John.
In: Argumentation, Vol. 11, No. 3, 1997, p. 277-292.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Epistemic normativity, argumentation, and fallacies
AU - Siegel, Harvey
AU - Biro, John
PY - 1997
Y1 - 1997
N2 - In Biro and Siegel (1992) we argued that a theory of argumentation must fully engage the normativity of judgments about arguments, and we developed such a theory. In this paper we further develop and defend our theory.
AB - In Biro and Siegel (1992) we argued that a theory of argumentation must fully engage the normativity of judgments about arguments, and we developed such a theory. In this paper we further develop and defend our theory.
KW - Argumentation
KW - Epistemic normativity
KW - Epistemology
KW - Fallacies
KW - Methodology
KW - Normativity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646198380&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646198380&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:33646198380
VL - 11
SP - 277
EP - 292
JO - Argumentation
JF - Argumentation
SN - 0920-427X
IS - 3
ER -