Ephrins and their receptors: Binding versus biology

Carla T. Blits-Huizinga, Claudiu M. Nelersa, Arun Malhotra, Daniel J Liebl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Ephrins and Eph receptors play important roles in the development of the central nervous system and peripheral tissues by orchestrating cellular movements, resulting in events such as axonal growth cone guidance, tissue segmentation, and angiogenic remodeling. To understand the role of specific ephrin and Eph receptor interactions, it is important to identify the binding specificity between individual ligand-receptor complexes. To date, a dogma in the field suggests that there may be promiscuous binding within the subclasses of the ephrin family. However, this overlooks and contradicts several binding studies that suggest specificity within each subclass. Although binding studies only provide evidence on the dynamics and strength of protein interactions, they do not indicate whether particular interactions are physiologically relevant. Thus, distribution and gene targeted mutations of ephrins and their receptors can provide critical insights into the relevance of specific ligand-receptors interactions. This review mainly focuses on the B-class family and will evaluate the differences between binding affinities and biological functions, importance of oligomeric interactions, and structural differences and similarities between classes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)257-265
Number of pages9
JournalIUBMB Life
Volume56
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2004

Fingerprint

Eph Family Receptors
Ephrins
EphA1 Receptor
Tissue
Ligands
Growth Cones
Neurology
Cones
Central Nervous System
Genes
Mutation
Proteins

Keywords

  • Binding
  • Biological function
  • Crystal structure
  • Eph receptors
  • Ephrins

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry
  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics
  • Cell Biology

Cite this

Ephrins and their receptors : Binding versus biology. / Blits-Huizinga, Carla T.; Nelersa, Claudiu M.; Malhotra, Arun; Liebl, Daniel J.

In: IUBMB Life, Vol. 56, No. 5, 01.05.2004, p. 257-265.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Blits-Huizinga, Carla T. ; Nelersa, Claudiu M. ; Malhotra, Arun ; Liebl, Daniel J. / Ephrins and their receptors : Binding versus biology. In: IUBMB Life. 2004 ; Vol. 56, No. 5. pp. 257-265.
@article{cb6cf9799cf44000a281d680da5c4d30,
title = "Ephrins and their receptors: Binding versus biology",
abstract = "Ephrins and Eph receptors play important roles in the development of the central nervous system and peripheral tissues by orchestrating cellular movements, resulting in events such as axonal growth cone guidance, tissue segmentation, and angiogenic remodeling. To understand the role of specific ephrin and Eph receptor interactions, it is important to identify the binding specificity between individual ligand-receptor complexes. To date, a dogma in the field suggests that there may be promiscuous binding within the subclasses of the ephrin family. However, this overlooks and contradicts several binding studies that suggest specificity within each subclass. Although binding studies only provide evidence on the dynamics and strength of protein interactions, they do not indicate whether particular interactions are physiologically relevant. Thus, distribution and gene targeted mutations of ephrins and their receptors can provide critical insights into the relevance of specific ligand-receptors interactions. This review mainly focuses on the B-class family and will evaluate the differences between binding affinities and biological functions, importance of oligomeric interactions, and structural differences and similarities between classes.",
keywords = "Binding, Biological function, Crystal structure, Eph receptors, Ephrins",
author = "Blits-Huizinga, {Carla T.} and Nelersa, {Claudiu M.} and Arun Malhotra and Liebl, {Daniel J}",
year = "2004",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/15216540412331270076",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "257--265",
journal = "IUBMB Life",
issn = "1521-6543",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ephrins and their receptors

T2 - Binding versus biology

AU - Blits-Huizinga, Carla T.

AU - Nelersa, Claudiu M.

AU - Malhotra, Arun

AU - Liebl, Daniel J

PY - 2004/5/1

Y1 - 2004/5/1

N2 - Ephrins and Eph receptors play important roles in the development of the central nervous system and peripheral tissues by orchestrating cellular movements, resulting in events such as axonal growth cone guidance, tissue segmentation, and angiogenic remodeling. To understand the role of specific ephrin and Eph receptor interactions, it is important to identify the binding specificity between individual ligand-receptor complexes. To date, a dogma in the field suggests that there may be promiscuous binding within the subclasses of the ephrin family. However, this overlooks and contradicts several binding studies that suggest specificity within each subclass. Although binding studies only provide evidence on the dynamics and strength of protein interactions, they do not indicate whether particular interactions are physiologically relevant. Thus, distribution and gene targeted mutations of ephrins and their receptors can provide critical insights into the relevance of specific ligand-receptors interactions. This review mainly focuses on the B-class family and will evaluate the differences between binding affinities and biological functions, importance of oligomeric interactions, and structural differences and similarities between classes.

AB - Ephrins and Eph receptors play important roles in the development of the central nervous system and peripheral tissues by orchestrating cellular movements, resulting in events such as axonal growth cone guidance, tissue segmentation, and angiogenic remodeling. To understand the role of specific ephrin and Eph receptor interactions, it is important to identify the binding specificity between individual ligand-receptor complexes. To date, a dogma in the field suggests that there may be promiscuous binding within the subclasses of the ephrin family. However, this overlooks and contradicts several binding studies that suggest specificity within each subclass. Although binding studies only provide evidence on the dynamics and strength of protein interactions, they do not indicate whether particular interactions are physiologically relevant. Thus, distribution and gene targeted mutations of ephrins and their receptors can provide critical insights into the relevance of specific ligand-receptors interactions. This review mainly focuses on the B-class family and will evaluate the differences between binding affinities and biological functions, importance of oligomeric interactions, and structural differences and similarities between classes.

KW - Binding

KW - Biological function

KW - Crystal structure

KW - Eph receptors

KW - Ephrins

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4644236647&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4644236647&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15216540412331270076

DO - 10.1080/15216540412331270076

M3 - Article

C2 - 15370889

AN - SCOPUS:4644236647

VL - 56

SP - 257

EP - 265

JO - IUBMB Life

JF - IUBMB Life

SN - 1521-6543

IS - 5

ER -