Enhancing relationship quality measurement

The development of the relationship flourishing scale

Blaine Fowers, Jean Philippe Laurenceau, Randall D. Penfield, Laura M. Cohen, Samantha F. Lang, Meghan B. Owenz, Elizabeth Pasipandoya

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Relationship quality is the most frequently assessed construct in the intimate relationships literature. Dozens of assessment instruments exist, but the vast majority conceptualize relationship quality in terms of satisfaction (or a similar construct), which focuses on the hedonic (pleasure or happiness) dimension of the relationship. Some scholars question whether the richness and depth of adult intimate relationships can be captured by satisfaction ratings and suggest focusing on a complementary eudaimonic (human flourishing) dimension of the relationship. This study evaluates the development of the Relationship Flourishing Scale, a 12-item measure of eudaimonic relationship quality that assesses meaning, personal growth, relational giving, and goal sharing. The study supports the construct validity of the Relationship Flourishing Scale, including its content, concurrent, convergent, discriminant, and incremental validity. Its incremental validity and independence suggest that it provides information about deeper and richer aspects of relationship quality than do current hedonic relationship quality measures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)997-1007
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Family Psychology
Volume30
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2016

Fingerprint

Pleasure
Happiness
Growth

Keywords

  • Flourishing
  • Meaning
  • Personal growth
  • Relationship quality
  • Shared goals

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Fowers, B., Laurenceau, J. P., Penfield, R. D., Cohen, L. M., Lang, S. F., Owenz, M. B., & Pasipandoya, E. (2016). Enhancing relationship quality measurement: The development of the relationship flourishing scale. Journal of Family Psychology, 30(8), 997-1007. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000263

Enhancing relationship quality measurement : The development of the relationship flourishing scale. / Fowers, Blaine; Laurenceau, Jean Philippe; Penfield, Randall D.; Cohen, Laura M.; Lang, Samantha F.; Owenz, Meghan B.; Pasipandoya, Elizabeth.

In: Journal of Family Psychology, Vol. 30, No. 8, 01.12.2016, p. 997-1007.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fowers, B, Laurenceau, JP, Penfield, RD, Cohen, LM, Lang, SF, Owenz, MB & Pasipandoya, E 2016, 'Enhancing relationship quality measurement: The development of the relationship flourishing scale', Journal of Family Psychology, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 997-1007. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000263
Fowers, Blaine ; Laurenceau, Jean Philippe ; Penfield, Randall D. ; Cohen, Laura M. ; Lang, Samantha F. ; Owenz, Meghan B. ; Pasipandoya, Elizabeth. / Enhancing relationship quality measurement : The development of the relationship flourishing scale. In: Journal of Family Psychology. 2016 ; Vol. 30, No. 8. pp. 997-1007.
@article{26a5a04e35e94741b297df46c3832d7e,
title = "Enhancing relationship quality measurement: The development of the relationship flourishing scale",
abstract = "Relationship quality is the most frequently assessed construct in the intimate relationships literature. Dozens of assessment instruments exist, but the vast majority conceptualize relationship quality in terms of satisfaction (or a similar construct), which focuses on the hedonic (pleasure or happiness) dimension of the relationship. Some scholars question whether the richness and depth of adult intimate relationships can be captured by satisfaction ratings and suggest focusing on a complementary eudaimonic (human flourishing) dimension of the relationship. This study evaluates the development of the Relationship Flourishing Scale, a 12-item measure of eudaimonic relationship quality that assesses meaning, personal growth, relational giving, and goal sharing. The study supports the construct validity of the Relationship Flourishing Scale, including its content, concurrent, convergent, discriminant, and incremental validity. Its incremental validity and independence suggest that it provides information about deeper and richer aspects of relationship quality than do current hedonic relationship quality measures.",
keywords = "Flourishing, Meaning, Personal growth, Relationship quality, Shared goals",
author = "Blaine Fowers and Laurenceau, {Jean Philippe} and Penfield, {Randall D.} and Cohen, {Laura M.} and Lang, {Samantha F.} and Owenz, {Meghan B.} and Elizabeth Pasipandoya",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/fam0000263",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "997--1007",
journal = "Journal of Family Psychology",
issn = "0893-3200",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Enhancing relationship quality measurement

T2 - The development of the relationship flourishing scale

AU - Fowers, Blaine

AU - Laurenceau, Jean Philippe

AU - Penfield, Randall D.

AU - Cohen, Laura M.

AU - Lang, Samantha F.

AU - Owenz, Meghan B.

AU - Pasipandoya, Elizabeth

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - Relationship quality is the most frequently assessed construct in the intimate relationships literature. Dozens of assessment instruments exist, but the vast majority conceptualize relationship quality in terms of satisfaction (or a similar construct), which focuses on the hedonic (pleasure or happiness) dimension of the relationship. Some scholars question whether the richness and depth of adult intimate relationships can be captured by satisfaction ratings and suggest focusing on a complementary eudaimonic (human flourishing) dimension of the relationship. This study evaluates the development of the Relationship Flourishing Scale, a 12-item measure of eudaimonic relationship quality that assesses meaning, personal growth, relational giving, and goal sharing. The study supports the construct validity of the Relationship Flourishing Scale, including its content, concurrent, convergent, discriminant, and incremental validity. Its incremental validity and independence suggest that it provides information about deeper and richer aspects of relationship quality than do current hedonic relationship quality measures.

AB - Relationship quality is the most frequently assessed construct in the intimate relationships literature. Dozens of assessment instruments exist, but the vast majority conceptualize relationship quality in terms of satisfaction (or a similar construct), which focuses on the hedonic (pleasure or happiness) dimension of the relationship. Some scholars question whether the richness and depth of adult intimate relationships can be captured by satisfaction ratings and suggest focusing on a complementary eudaimonic (human flourishing) dimension of the relationship. This study evaluates the development of the Relationship Flourishing Scale, a 12-item measure of eudaimonic relationship quality that assesses meaning, personal growth, relational giving, and goal sharing. The study supports the construct validity of the Relationship Flourishing Scale, including its content, concurrent, convergent, discriminant, and incremental validity. Its incremental validity and independence suggest that it provides information about deeper and richer aspects of relationship quality than do current hedonic relationship quality measures.

KW - Flourishing

KW - Meaning

KW - Personal growth

KW - Relationship quality

KW - Shared goals

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85003748566&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85003748566&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/fam0000263

DO - 10.1037/fam0000263

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 997

EP - 1007

JO - Journal of Family Psychology

JF - Journal of Family Psychology

SN - 0893-3200

IS - 8

ER -