Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and Trucut biopsy in thoracic lesions: When tissue is the issue

Ian Storch, Mubashir Shah, Richard J Thurer, Elio Donna, Afonso Ribeiro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS FNA) has a high accuracy in the evaluation of mediastinal lesions. The use of a core biopsy needle for EUS guided biopsy (EUS TCB) may further improve the yield of EUS. The aims of this study are to evaluate the safety of EUS TCB in thoracic lesions and to compare the diagnostic accuracy of TCB with FNA and FNA + TCB. Methods: A single-center retrospective study. All patients underwent EUS-FNA and TCB. A cytopathologist was not present during the procedure. EUS FNA, TCB and FNA + TCB diagnostic accuracy were compared. Results: A total of 48 patients were included. The lesions sampled included 41 lymph nodes (six aorto-pulmonary window, 32 subcarinal, two right paratracheal, one paraesophageal ATS station 8), five lung masses, and two esophageal masses. Twenty-nine patients had malignant disease and 19 had benign disorders. The overall diagnostic accuracy of FNA, TCB and FNA + TCB was 79%, 79% and 98% respectively (p = 0.007). TCB changed the diagnosis in nine cases missed by FNA. EUS TCB was better than FNA for benign diseases (89% vs. 63%, p = 0.04). All eight patients with a prior failed biopsy had a correct diagnosis established by EUS. No patient required mediastinoscopy or thoracoscopy after EUS. Conclusion: The combination of TCB and FNA is superior to FNA alone. EUS-guided TCB should be considered in patients with benign disorders of the mediastinum when other modalities fail to yield a diagnosis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)86-90
Number of pages5
JournalSurgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2008

Fingerprint

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration
Fine Needle Biopsy
Thorax
Mediastinoscopy
Large-Core Needle Biopsy
Biopsy
Thoracoscopy
Lung
Mediastinum
Retrospective Studies
Lymph Nodes
Safety

Keywords

  • Endoscopy
  • Ultrasonography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and Trucut biopsy in thoracic lesions : When tissue is the issue. / Storch, Ian; Shah, Mubashir; Thurer, Richard J; Donna, Elio; Ribeiro, Afonso.

In: Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, Vol. 22, No. 1, 01.01.2008, p. 86-90.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ad034f706d7f419a9cafc9235cb73466,
title = "Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and Trucut biopsy in thoracic lesions: When tissue is the issue",
abstract = "Background: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS FNA) has a high accuracy in the evaluation of mediastinal lesions. The use of a core biopsy needle for EUS guided biopsy (EUS TCB) may further improve the yield of EUS. The aims of this study are to evaluate the safety of EUS TCB in thoracic lesions and to compare the diagnostic accuracy of TCB with FNA and FNA + TCB. Methods: A single-center retrospective study. All patients underwent EUS-FNA and TCB. A cytopathologist was not present during the procedure. EUS FNA, TCB and FNA + TCB diagnostic accuracy were compared. Results: A total of 48 patients were included. The lesions sampled included 41 lymph nodes (six aorto-pulmonary window, 32 subcarinal, two right paratracheal, one paraesophageal ATS station 8), five lung masses, and two esophageal masses. Twenty-nine patients had malignant disease and 19 had benign disorders. The overall diagnostic accuracy of FNA, TCB and FNA + TCB was 79{\%}, 79{\%} and 98{\%} respectively (p = 0.007). TCB changed the diagnosis in nine cases missed by FNA. EUS TCB was better than FNA for benign diseases (89{\%} vs. 63{\%}, p = 0.04). All eight patients with a prior failed biopsy had a correct diagnosis established by EUS. No patient required mediastinoscopy or thoracoscopy after EUS. Conclusion: The combination of TCB and FNA is superior to FNA alone. EUS-guided TCB should be considered in patients with benign disorders of the mediastinum when other modalities fail to yield a diagnosis.",
keywords = "Endoscopy, Ultrasonography",
author = "Ian Storch and Mubashir Shah and Thurer, {Richard J} and Elio Donna and Afonso Ribeiro",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00464-007-9374-x",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "86--90",
journal = "Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques",
issn = "0930-2794",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and Trucut biopsy in thoracic lesions

T2 - When tissue is the issue

AU - Storch, Ian

AU - Shah, Mubashir

AU - Thurer, Richard J

AU - Donna, Elio

AU - Ribeiro, Afonso

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - Background: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS FNA) has a high accuracy in the evaluation of mediastinal lesions. The use of a core biopsy needle for EUS guided biopsy (EUS TCB) may further improve the yield of EUS. The aims of this study are to evaluate the safety of EUS TCB in thoracic lesions and to compare the diagnostic accuracy of TCB with FNA and FNA + TCB. Methods: A single-center retrospective study. All patients underwent EUS-FNA and TCB. A cytopathologist was not present during the procedure. EUS FNA, TCB and FNA + TCB diagnostic accuracy were compared. Results: A total of 48 patients were included. The lesions sampled included 41 lymph nodes (six aorto-pulmonary window, 32 subcarinal, two right paratracheal, one paraesophageal ATS station 8), five lung masses, and two esophageal masses. Twenty-nine patients had malignant disease and 19 had benign disorders. The overall diagnostic accuracy of FNA, TCB and FNA + TCB was 79%, 79% and 98% respectively (p = 0.007). TCB changed the diagnosis in nine cases missed by FNA. EUS TCB was better than FNA for benign diseases (89% vs. 63%, p = 0.04). All eight patients with a prior failed biopsy had a correct diagnosis established by EUS. No patient required mediastinoscopy or thoracoscopy after EUS. Conclusion: The combination of TCB and FNA is superior to FNA alone. EUS-guided TCB should be considered in patients with benign disorders of the mediastinum when other modalities fail to yield a diagnosis.

AB - Background: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS FNA) has a high accuracy in the evaluation of mediastinal lesions. The use of a core biopsy needle for EUS guided biopsy (EUS TCB) may further improve the yield of EUS. The aims of this study are to evaluate the safety of EUS TCB in thoracic lesions and to compare the diagnostic accuracy of TCB with FNA and FNA + TCB. Methods: A single-center retrospective study. All patients underwent EUS-FNA and TCB. A cytopathologist was not present during the procedure. EUS FNA, TCB and FNA + TCB diagnostic accuracy were compared. Results: A total of 48 patients were included. The lesions sampled included 41 lymph nodes (six aorto-pulmonary window, 32 subcarinal, two right paratracheal, one paraesophageal ATS station 8), five lung masses, and two esophageal masses. Twenty-nine patients had malignant disease and 19 had benign disorders. The overall diagnostic accuracy of FNA, TCB and FNA + TCB was 79%, 79% and 98% respectively (p = 0.007). TCB changed the diagnosis in nine cases missed by FNA. EUS TCB was better than FNA for benign diseases (89% vs. 63%, p = 0.04). All eight patients with a prior failed biopsy had a correct diagnosis established by EUS. No patient required mediastinoscopy or thoracoscopy after EUS. Conclusion: The combination of TCB and FNA is superior to FNA alone. EUS-guided TCB should be considered in patients with benign disorders of the mediastinum when other modalities fail to yield a diagnosis.

KW - Endoscopy

KW - Ultrasonography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=37749007303&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=37749007303&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00464-007-9374-x

DO - 10.1007/s00464-007-9374-x

M3 - Article

C2 - 17479313

AN - SCOPUS:37749007303

VL - 22

SP - 86

EP - 90

JO - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

JF - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

SN - 0930-2794

IS - 1

ER -