Endoscopic endonasal versus open transcranial resection of anterior midline skull base meningiomas

Ricardo J Komotar, Robert M. Starke, Daniel M S Raper, Vijay K. Anand, Theodore H. Schwartz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

98 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To assess the advantages and limitations of the endoscopic endonasal approach to anterior skull base meningiomas, a minimally invasive approach that avoids extensive bone drilling, brain retraction, and manipulation of nerves and critical vessels, versus open transcranial surgery. Methods: A MEDLINE (2000-2010) search was performed to identify series for either olfactory groove meningiomas or tuberculum sellae (TS) or planum sphenoidale meningiomas. Statistical analyses of categorical variables such as extent of resection, morbidity, and visual outcome were performed using χ 2 and Fisher exact tests. Results: The literature review included 60 studies, involving 1426 patients. Open surgery achieved a higher rate of gross total resection (GTR) for both olfactory groove (P < 0.001) and TS and planum (P < 0.001) meningiomas. Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak occurred more frequently in the endoscopic cohort (P < 0.001). Other postoperative complications occurred more frequently in the open cohort, although this difference was not statistically significant. There were no significant differences in postoperative visual outcome between the groups. Conclusions: Based on the current literature, open transcranial approaches for olfactory groove and TS and planum sphenoidale meningiomas still result in higher rates of total resection with lower postoperative CSF leak rates. The endoscopic endonasal approach may be safe and effective for certain skull base meningiomas; careful patient selection and multilayer closure techniques are essential.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)713-724
Number of pages12
JournalWorld Neurosurgery
Volume77
Issue number5-6
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Skull Base
Meningioma
Temazepam
MEDLINE
Patient Selection
Morbidity
Bone and Bones
Brain

Keywords

  • Endonasal
  • Endoscopic
  • Meningioma
  • Minimal access
  • Minimally invasive
  • Olfactory groove
  • Outcomes
  • Planum sphenoidale
  • Skull base
  • Surgery
  • Systematic review
  • Tuberculum sellae

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Endoscopic endonasal versus open transcranial resection of anterior midline skull base meningiomas. / Komotar, Ricardo J; Starke, Robert M.; Raper, Daniel M S; Anand, Vijay K.; Schwartz, Theodore H.

In: World Neurosurgery, Vol. 77, No. 5-6, 01.05.2012, p. 713-724.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Komotar, Ricardo J ; Starke, Robert M. ; Raper, Daniel M S ; Anand, Vijay K. ; Schwartz, Theodore H. / Endoscopic endonasal versus open transcranial resection of anterior midline skull base meningiomas. In: World Neurosurgery. 2012 ; Vol. 77, No. 5-6. pp. 713-724.
@article{05c5f348c22145ebb8f998d3b8c782d0,
title = "Endoscopic endonasal versus open transcranial resection of anterior midline skull base meningiomas",
abstract = "Objective: To assess the advantages and limitations of the endoscopic endonasal approach to anterior skull base meningiomas, a minimally invasive approach that avoids extensive bone drilling, brain retraction, and manipulation of nerves and critical vessels, versus open transcranial surgery. Methods: A MEDLINE (2000-2010) search was performed to identify series for either olfactory groove meningiomas or tuberculum sellae (TS) or planum sphenoidale meningiomas. Statistical analyses of categorical variables such as extent of resection, morbidity, and visual outcome were performed using χ 2 and Fisher exact tests. Results: The literature review included 60 studies, involving 1426 patients. Open surgery achieved a higher rate of gross total resection (GTR) for both olfactory groove (P < 0.001) and TS and planum (P < 0.001) meningiomas. Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak occurred more frequently in the endoscopic cohort (P < 0.001). Other postoperative complications occurred more frequently in the open cohort, although this difference was not statistically significant. There were no significant differences in postoperative visual outcome between the groups. Conclusions: Based on the current literature, open transcranial approaches for olfactory groove and TS and planum sphenoidale meningiomas still result in higher rates of total resection with lower postoperative CSF leak rates. The endoscopic endonasal approach may be safe and effective for certain skull base meningiomas; careful patient selection and multilayer closure techniques are essential.",
keywords = "Endonasal, Endoscopic, Meningioma, Minimal access, Minimally invasive, Olfactory groove, Outcomes, Planum sphenoidale, Skull base, Surgery, Systematic review, Tuberculum sellae",
author = "Komotar, {Ricardo J} and Starke, {Robert M.} and Raper, {Daniel M S} and Anand, {Vijay K.} and Schwartz, {Theodore H.}",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.wneu.2011.08.025",
language = "English",
volume = "77",
pages = "713--724",
journal = "World Neurosurgery",
issn = "1878-8750",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5-6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Endoscopic endonasal versus open transcranial resection of anterior midline skull base meningiomas

AU - Komotar, Ricardo J

AU - Starke, Robert M.

AU - Raper, Daniel M S

AU - Anand, Vijay K.

AU - Schwartz, Theodore H.

PY - 2012/5/1

Y1 - 2012/5/1

N2 - Objective: To assess the advantages and limitations of the endoscopic endonasal approach to anterior skull base meningiomas, a minimally invasive approach that avoids extensive bone drilling, brain retraction, and manipulation of nerves and critical vessels, versus open transcranial surgery. Methods: A MEDLINE (2000-2010) search was performed to identify series for either olfactory groove meningiomas or tuberculum sellae (TS) or planum sphenoidale meningiomas. Statistical analyses of categorical variables such as extent of resection, morbidity, and visual outcome were performed using χ 2 and Fisher exact tests. Results: The literature review included 60 studies, involving 1426 patients. Open surgery achieved a higher rate of gross total resection (GTR) for both olfactory groove (P < 0.001) and TS and planum (P < 0.001) meningiomas. Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak occurred more frequently in the endoscopic cohort (P < 0.001). Other postoperative complications occurred more frequently in the open cohort, although this difference was not statistically significant. There were no significant differences in postoperative visual outcome between the groups. Conclusions: Based on the current literature, open transcranial approaches for olfactory groove and TS and planum sphenoidale meningiomas still result in higher rates of total resection with lower postoperative CSF leak rates. The endoscopic endonasal approach may be safe and effective for certain skull base meningiomas; careful patient selection and multilayer closure techniques are essential.

AB - Objective: To assess the advantages and limitations of the endoscopic endonasal approach to anterior skull base meningiomas, a minimally invasive approach that avoids extensive bone drilling, brain retraction, and manipulation of nerves and critical vessels, versus open transcranial surgery. Methods: A MEDLINE (2000-2010) search was performed to identify series for either olfactory groove meningiomas or tuberculum sellae (TS) or planum sphenoidale meningiomas. Statistical analyses of categorical variables such as extent of resection, morbidity, and visual outcome were performed using χ 2 and Fisher exact tests. Results: The literature review included 60 studies, involving 1426 patients. Open surgery achieved a higher rate of gross total resection (GTR) for both olfactory groove (P < 0.001) and TS and planum (P < 0.001) meningiomas. Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak occurred more frequently in the endoscopic cohort (P < 0.001). Other postoperative complications occurred more frequently in the open cohort, although this difference was not statistically significant. There were no significant differences in postoperative visual outcome between the groups. Conclusions: Based on the current literature, open transcranial approaches for olfactory groove and TS and planum sphenoidale meningiomas still result in higher rates of total resection with lower postoperative CSF leak rates. The endoscopic endonasal approach may be safe and effective for certain skull base meningiomas; careful patient selection and multilayer closure techniques are essential.

KW - Endonasal

KW - Endoscopic

KW - Meningioma

KW - Minimal access

KW - Minimally invasive

KW - Olfactory groove

KW - Outcomes

KW - Planum sphenoidale

KW - Skull base

KW - Surgery

KW - Systematic review

KW - Tuberculum sellae

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861315101&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861315101&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.wneu.2011.08.025

DO - 10.1016/j.wneu.2011.08.025

M3 - Article

C2 - 22120296

AN - SCOPUS:84861315101

VL - 77

SP - 713

EP - 724

JO - World Neurosurgery

JF - World Neurosurgery

SN - 1878-8750

IS - 5-6

ER -