Endoscopic endonasal compared with microscopic transsphenoidal and open transcranial resection of giant pituitary adenomas

Ricardo J Komotar, Robert M. Starke, Daniel M S Raper, Vijay K. Anand, Theodore H. Schwartz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

102 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Giant (>4 cm) pituitary macroadenomas often require surgery to decompress the optic nerves. Compared with traditional open or transsphenoidal microscopic methods, the extended endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach offers the potential for aggressive resection via a minimal access corridor. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to further our understanding of the role of endoscopy in the management of these challenging lesions. MEDLINE search of the modern literature (1995-2010) to identify surgical series for pediatric and adult pituitary adenomas >4 cm in maximal diameter. Patient and tumor characteristics, resection, morbidity and visual outcome were compared by approach. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests with post-hoc Bonferroni analysis were used for statistical analyses. Sixteen studies (478 patients) were included. Compared with the open cohort, the endoscopic cohort had higher rates of gross total resection (47.2% vs. 9.6%; P<0.003) and improved visual outcome (91.1% vs. 45.7%; P<0.003). The microscopic transsphenoidal cohort had lower rate of total resection and worse visual outcomes than the endoscopic group. There were no instances of postoperative CSF leak reported in the endoscopic group. The transcranial group had a higher rate perioperative mortality compared to the transsphenoidal group (P = 0.004). In select cases, the endoscopic endonasal approach is safe and effective for the treatment of giant pituitary adenomas, with the potential for gross total resection and improved visual outcome. CSF leak, which is a major limitation of the endonasal approach, may be avoided using meticulous multi-layer closure and vascularised nasoseptal flaps.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)150-159
Number of pages10
JournalPituitary
Volume15
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2012

Fingerprint

Pituitary Neoplasms
Modern Literature
Optic Nerve
MEDLINE
Endoscopy
Pediatrics
Morbidity
Mortality
Neoplasms
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Endonasal
  • Endoscopic
  • Giant pituitary adenoma
  • Minimal access
  • Skull base
  • Surgery
  • Systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Endocrinology
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Cite this

Endoscopic endonasal compared with microscopic transsphenoidal and open transcranial resection of giant pituitary adenomas. / Komotar, Ricardo J; Starke, Robert M.; Raper, Daniel M S; Anand, Vijay K.; Schwartz, Theodore H.

In: Pituitary, Vol. 15, No. 2, 01.06.2012, p. 150-159.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Komotar, Ricardo J ; Starke, Robert M. ; Raper, Daniel M S ; Anand, Vijay K. ; Schwartz, Theodore H. / Endoscopic endonasal compared with microscopic transsphenoidal and open transcranial resection of giant pituitary adenomas. In: Pituitary. 2012 ; Vol. 15, No. 2. pp. 150-159.
@article{f6681ccd1d324d9283cdee1b27e06a0f,
title = "Endoscopic endonasal compared with microscopic transsphenoidal and open transcranial resection of giant pituitary adenomas",
abstract = "Giant (>4 cm) pituitary macroadenomas often require surgery to decompress the optic nerves. Compared with traditional open or transsphenoidal microscopic methods, the extended endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach offers the potential for aggressive resection via a minimal access corridor. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to further our understanding of the role of endoscopy in the management of these challenging lesions. MEDLINE search of the modern literature (1995-2010) to identify surgical series for pediatric and adult pituitary adenomas >4 cm in maximal diameter. Patient and tumor characteristics, resection, morbidity and visual outcome were compared by approach. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests with post-hoc Bonferroni analysis were used for statistical analyses. Sixteen studies (478 patients) were included. Compared with the open cohort, the endoscopic cohort had higher rates of gross total resection (47.2{\%} vs. 9.6{\%}; P<0.003) and improved visual outcome (91.1{\%} vs. 45.7{\%}; P<0.003). The microscopic transsphenoidal cohort had lower rate of total resection and worse visual outcomes than the endoscopic group. There were no instances of postoperative CSF leak reported in the endoscopic group. The transcranial group had a higher rate perioperative mortality compared to the transsphenoidal group (P = 0.004). In select cases, the endoscopic endonasal approach is safe and effective for the treatment of giant pituitary adenomas, with the potential for gross total resection and improved visual outcome. CSF leak, which is a major limitation of the endonasal approach, may be avoided using meticulous multi-layer closure and vascularised nasoseptal flaps.",
keywords = "Endonasal, Endoscopic, Giant pituitary adenoma, Minimal access, Skull base, Surgery, Systematic review",
author = "Komotar, {Ricardo J} and Starke, {Robert M.} and Raper, {Daniel M S} and Anand, {Vijay K.} and Schwartz, {Theodore H.}",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11102-011-0359-3",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "150--159",
journal = "Pituitary",
issn = "1386-341X",
publisher = "Kluwer Academic Publishers",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Endoscopic endonasal compared with microscopic transsphenoidal and open transcranial resection of giant pituitary adenomas

AU - Komotar, Ricardo J

AU - Starke, Robert M.

AU - Raper, Daniel M S

AU - Anand, Vijay K.

AU - Schwartz, Theodore H.

PY - 2012/6/1

Y1 - 2012/6/1

N2 - Giant (>4 cm) pituitary macroadenomas often require surgery to decompress the optic nerves. Compared with traditional open or transsphenoidal microscopic methods, the extended endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach offers the potential for aggressive resection via a minimal access corridor. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to further our understanding of the role of endoscopy in the management of these challenging lesions. MEDLINE search of the modern literature (1995-2010) to identify surgical series for pediatric and adult pituitary adenomas >4 cm in maximal diameter. Patient and tumor characteristics, resection, morbidity and visual outcome were compared by approach. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests with post-hoc Bonferroni analysis were used for statistical analyses. Sixteen studies (478 patients) were included. Compared with the open cohort, the endoscopic cohort had higher rates of gross total resection (47.2% vs. 9.6%; P<0.003) and improved visual outcome (91.1% vs. 45.7%; P<0.003). The microscopic transsphenoidal cohort had lower rate of total resection and worse visual outcomes than the endoscopic group. There were no instances of postoperative CSF leak reported in the endoscopic group. The transcranial group had a higher rate perioperative mortality compared to the transsphenoidal group (P = 0.004). In select cases, the endoscopic endonasal approach is safe and effective for the treatment of giant pituitary adenomas, with the potential for gross total resection and improved visual outcome. CSF leak, which is a major limitation of the endonasal approach, may be avoided using meticulous multi-layer closure and vascularised nasoseptal flaps.

AB - Giant (>4 cm) pituitary macroadenomas often require surgery to decompress the optic nerves. Compared with traditional open or transsphenoidal microscopic methods, the extended endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach offers the potential for aggressive resection via a minimal access corridor. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to further our understanding of the role of endoscopy in the management of these challenging lesions. MEDLINE search of the modern literature (1995-2010) to identify surgical series for pediatric and adult pituitary adenomas >4 cm in maximal diameter. Patient and tumor characteristics, resection, morbidity and visual outcome were compared by approach. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests with post-hoc Bonferroni analysis were used for statistical analyses. Sixteen studies (478 patients) were included. Compared with the open cohort, the endoscopic cohort had higher rates of gross total resection (47.2% vs. 9.6%; P<0.003) and improved visual outcome (91.1% vs. 45.7%; P<0.003). The microscopic transsphenoidal cohort had lower rate of total resection and worse visual outcomes than the endoscopic group. There were no instances of postoperative CSF leak reported in the endoscopic group. The transcranial group had a higher rate perioperative mortality compared to the transsphenoidal group (P = 0.004). In select cases, the endoscopic endonasal approach is safe and effective for the treatment of giant pituitary adenomas, with the potential for gross total resection and improved visual outcome. CSF leak, which is a major limitation of the endonasal approach, may be avoided using meticulous multi-layer closure and vascularised nasoseptal flaps.

KW - Endonasal

KW - Endoscopic

KW - Giant pituitary adenoma

KW - Minimal access

KW - Skull base

KW - Surgery

KW - Systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861455931&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861455931&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11102-011-0359-3

DO - 10.1007/s11102-011-0359-3

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 150

EP - 159

JO - Pituitary

JF - Pituitary

SN - 1386-341X

IS - 2

ER -