Empirical factors and structure transference: Returning to the London account

Otavio Bueno, Steven French, James Ladyman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We offer a framework to represent the roles of empirical and theoretical factors in theory construction, and examine a case study to illustrate how the framework can be used to illuminate central features of scientific reasoning. The case study provides an extension of French and Ladyman's (1997) analysis of Fritz and Heinz London's model of superconductivity to accommodate the role of the analogy between superconductivity and diamagnetic phenomena in the development of the model between 1935 and 1937. We focus on this case since it allows us to separate the roles of empirical and theoretical factors, and so provides an example of the utility of the approach that we have adopted. We conclude the paper by drawing on the particular framework here developed to address a range of concerns.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)95-104
Number of pages10
JournalStudies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B - Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics
Volume43
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2012

Fingerprint

superconductivity
Transference
Superconductivity
Scientific Reasoning
Theory Construction

Keywords

  • London and London model
  • Models
  • Partial structures
  • Semantic approach
  • Superconductivity
  • Theory construction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History and Philosophy of Science
  • Physics and Astronomy(all)
  • History

Cite this

@article{bd3e54f82330455eb36f06b27a36c7d5,
title = "Empirical factors and structure transference: Returning to the London account",
abstract = "We offer a framework to represent the roles of empirical and theoretical factors in theory construction, and examine a case study to illustrate how the framework can be used to illuminate central features of scientific reasoning. The case study provides an extension of French and Ladyman's (1997) analysis of Fritz and Heinz London's model of superconductivity to accommodate the role of the analogy between superconductivity and diamagnetic phenomena in the development of the model between 1935 and 1937. We focus on this case since it allows us to separate the roles of empirical and theoretical factors, and so provides an example of the utility of the approach that we have adopted. We conclude the paper by drawing on the particular framework here developed to address a range of concerns.",
keywords = "London and London model, Models, Partial structures, Semantic approach, Superconductivity, Theory construction",
author = "Otavio Bueno and Steven French and James Ladyman",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.shpsb.2012.02.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "95--104",
journal = "Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B - Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics",
issn = "1355-2198",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Empirical factors and structure transference

T2 - Returning to the London account

AU - Bueno, Otavio

AU - French, Steven

AU - Ladyman, James

PY - 2012/5

Y1 - 2012/5

N2 - We offer a framework to represent the roles of empirical and theoretical factors in theory construction, and examine a case study to illustrate how the framework can be used to illuminate central features of scientific reasoning. The case study provides an extension of French and Ladyman's (1997) analysis of Fritz and Heinz London's model of superconductivity to accommodate the role of the analogy between superconductivity and diamagnetic phenomena in the development of the model between 1935 and 1937. We focus on this case since it allows us to separate the roles of empirical and theoretical factors, and so provides an example of the utility of the approach that we have adopted. We conclude the paper by drawing on the particular framework here developed to address a range of concerns.

AB - We offer a framework to represent the roles of empirical and theoretical factors in theory construction, and examine a case study to illustrate how the framework can be used to illuminate central features of scientific reasoning. The case study provides an extension of French and Ladyman's (1997) analysis of Fritz and Heinz London's model of superconductivity to accommodate the role of the analogy between superconductivity and diamagnetic phenomena in the development of the model between 1935 and 1937. We focus on this case since it allows us to separate the roles of empirical and theoretical factors, and so provides an example of the utility of the approach that we have adopted. We conclude the paper by drawing on the particular framework here developed to address a range of concerns.

KW - London and London model

KW - Models

KW - Partial structures

KW - Semantic approach

KW - Superconductivity

KW - Theory construction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859715257&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859715257&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.shpsb.2012.02.003

DO - 10.1016/j.shpsb.2012.02.003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84859715257

VL - 43

SP - 95

EP - 104

JO - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B - Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics

JF - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B - Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics

SN - 1355-2198

IS - 2

ER -