Emergency Medicine Standardized Letter of Evaluation (SLOE): Findings From the New Electronic SLOE Format

Jennifer Shannon Jackson, Michael Bond, Jeffrey N. Love, Cullen Hegarty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Emergency medicine (EM) uses a standardized template for residency application letters of recommendations. In 1997, the Standardized Letter of Recommendation was developed with categories for applicant comparison. Now named the Standardized Letter of Evaluation (SLOE), it is a universal requirement in the EM residency application process. In 2016, a website called "eSLOE" was launched for credentialed academic EM faculty to enter applicant data, which generates a SLOE. Objective: This article outlines website creation for the eSLOE and its successful national implementation in the 2016-2017 EM residency application cycle. We analyzed current trends in applicant assessments from the eSLOE data and compared them to prior data. Methods: Data from 2016-2017 were sorted and analyzed for each question on the eSLOE. An analysis of Global Assessment and Qualifications for EM rankings, clerkship grade, and comparison with prior SLOE data was performed. Results: Analysis of 6715 eSLOEs for 3138 unique applicants revealed the following Global Assessment rankings: top 10%, top one-third, middle one-third, and lower one-third. There was less spread with the distribution for clerkship grade and Qualifications for EM. The 2011-2012 standard letter of recommendation global assessment data, with top 10%, top one-third, middle one-third, and lower one-third, also revealed top-clustered results with less spread compared with the ranking usage in 2016-2017. Conclusions: Results indicate an improved spread of all rank categories for Global Assessment, enhancing the eSLOE's applicant discrimination. There has been an overall improvement in rank designation when compared with previously published data.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)182-186
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of graduate medical education
Volume11
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2019

Fingerprint

Emergency Medicine
Internship and Residency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Emergency Medicine Standardized Letter of Evaluation (SLOE) : Findings From the New Electronic SLOE Format. / Jackson, Jennifer Shannon; Bond, Michael; Love, Jeffrey N.; Hegarty, Cullen.

In: Journal of graduate medical education, Vol. 11, No. 2, 01.04.2019, p. 182-186.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ed4a31323f774317826e8ef7af8ca871,
title = "Emergency Medicine Standardized Letter of Evaluation (SLOE): Findings From the New Electronic SLOE Format",
abstract = "Background: Emergency medicine (EM) uses a standardized template for residency application letters of recommendations. In 1997, the Standardized Letter of Recommendation was developed with categories for applicant comparison. Now named the Standardized Letter of Evaluation (SLOE), it is a universal requirement in the EM residency application process. In 2016, a website called {"}eSLOE{"} was launched for credentialed academic EM faculty to enter applicant data, which generates a SLOE. Objective: This article outlines website creation for the eSLOE and its successful national implementation in the 2016-2017 EM residency application cycle. We analyzed current trends in applicant assessments from the eSLOE data and compared them to prior data. Methods: Data from 2016-2017 were sorted and analyzed for each question on the eSLOE. An analysis of Global Assessment and Qualifications for EM rankings, clerkship grade, and comparison with prior SLOE data was performed. Results: Analysis of 6715 eSLOEs for 3138 unique applicants revealed the following Global Assessment rankings: top 10{\%}, top one-third, middle one-third, and lower one-third. There was less spread with the distribution for clerkship grade and Qualifications for EM. The 2011-2012 standard letter of recommendation global assessment data, with top 10{\%}, top one-third, middle one-third, and lower one-third, also revealed top-clustered results with less spread compared with the ranking usage in 2016-2017. Conclusions: Results indicate an improved spread of all rank categories for Global Assessment, enhancing the eSLOE's applicant discrimination. There has been an overall improvement in rank designation when compared with previously published data.",
author = "Jackson, {Jennifer Shannon} and Michael Bond and Love, {Jeffrey N.} and Cullen Hegarty",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4300/JGME-D-18-00344.1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "182--186",
journal = "Journal of graduate medical education",
issn = "1949-8349",
publisher = "University of Finance and Management",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Emergency Medicine Standardized Letter of Evaluation (SLOE)

T2 - Findings From the New Electronic SLOE Format

AU - Jackson, Jennifer Shannon

AU - Bond, Michael

AU - Love, Jeffrey N.

AU - Hegarty, Cullen

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - Background: Emergency medicine (EM) uses a standardized template for residency application letters of recommendations. In 1997, the Standardized Letter of Recommendation was developed with categories for applicant comparison. Now named the Standardized Letter of Evaluation (SLOE), it is a universal requirement in the EM residency application process. In 2016, a website called "eSLOE" was launched for credentialed academic EM faculty to enter applicant data, which generates a SLOE. Objective: This article outlines website creation for the eSLOE and its successful national implementation in the 2016-2017 EM residency application cycle. We analyzed current trends in applicant assessments from the eSLOE data and compared them to prior data. Methods: Data from 2016-2017 were sorted and analyzed for each question on the eSLOE. An analysis of Global Assessment and Qualifications for EM rankings, clerkship grade, and comparison with prior SLOE data was performed. Results: Analysis of 6715 eSLOEs for 3138 unique applicants revealed the following Global Assessment rankings: top 10%, top one-third, middle one-third, and lower one-third. There was less spread with the distribution for clerkship grade and Qualifications for EM. The 2011-2012 standard letter of recommendation global assessment data, with top 10%, top one-third, middle one-third, and lower one-third, also revealed top-clustered results with less spread compared with the ranking usage in 2016-2017. Conclusions: Results indicate an improved spread of all rank categories for Global Assessment, enhancing the eSLOE's applicant discrimination. There has been an overall improvement in rank designation when compared with previously published data.

AB - Background: Emergency medicine (EM) uses a standardized template for residency application letters of recommendations. In 1997, the Standardized Letter of Recommendation was developed with categories for applicant comparison. Now named the Standardized Letter of Evaluation (SLOE), it is a universal requirement in the EM residency application process. In 2016, a website called "eSLOE" was launched for credentialed academic EM faculty to enter applicant data, which generates a SLOE. Objective: This article outlines website creation for the eSLOE and its successful national implementation in the 2016-2017 EM residency application cycle. We analyzed current trends in applicant assessments from the eSLOE data and compared them to prior data. Methods: Data from 2016-2017 were sorted and analyzed for each question on the eSLOE. An analysis of Global Assessment and Qualifications for EM rankings, clerkship grade, and comparison with prior SLOE data was performed. Results: Analysis of 6715 eSLOEs for 3138 unique applicants revealed the following Global Assessment rankings: top 10%, top one-third, middle one-third, and lower one-third. There was less spread with the distribution for clerkship grade and Qualifications for EM. The 2011-2012 standard letter of recommendation global assessment data, with top 10%, top one-third, middle one-third, and lower one-third, also revealed top-clustered results with less spread compared with the ranking usage in 2016-2017. Conclusions: Results indicate an improved spread of all rank categories for Global Assessment, enhancing the eSLOE's applicant discrimination. There has been an overall improvement in rank designation when compared with previously published data.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065439754&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065439754&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4300/JGME-D-18-00344.1

DO - 10.4300/JGME-D-18-00344.1

M3 - Article

C2 - 31024650

AN - SCOPUS:85065439754

VL - 11

SP - 182

EP - 186

JO - Journal of graduate medical education

JF - Journal of graduate medical education

SN - 1949-8349

IS - 2

ER -