ELISA absorbance cut-off method affects malaria sporozoite rate determination in wild Afrotropical Anopheles.

John C Beier, C. M. Asiago, F. K. Onyango, J. K. Koros

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Malaria sporozoite infection rates in a mixed species group of 244 Anopheles gambiae Giles sensu lato and 115 An.funestus Giles wild female mosquitoes were compared using three methods to determine cut-off absorbance values for positivity of a Plasmodium falciparum Welch enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Positive controls were based on P.falciparum circumsporozoite protein. As negative controls, four wild male Anopheles were included on each microtitre plate; tests were repeated on four consecutive days for each plate. Infection rates were estimated at 13.1-22.8% using the mean absorbance value of negative controls plus three standard deviations, 11.7-12.8% using double the mean and 12.5-13.6% using the fixed cut-off value of 0.20 (allowing for 20% variation in negative control absorbance values). Observed agreement for positivity or negativity among samples tested four times was 98.6% for the 2 x mean method, 97.2% for the fixed cut-off 0.20 value, but only 82.7% for the mean + 3 SD method. It was concluded that the 2x mean cut-off method is most reliable for field studies. P.falciparum sporozoite rates of 12.2% in An.funestus and 11.9% in An.gambiae s.l. were thus determined on the basis of the 2x mean cut-off method. This comparative evaluation demonstrates that vector infectivity rates can be seriously over-estimated from sporozoite ELISA tests, by as much as 87% in one case considered here, depending on the absorbance cut-off method applied for negative controls.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)259-264
Number of pages6
JournalMedical and Veterinary Entomology
Volume2
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jul 1 1988
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Sporozoites
Anopheles
sporozoites
malaria
absorbance
Malaria
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
assay
enzyme
methodology
Anopheles gambiae
infectivity
Plasmodium falciparum
Infection
Culicidae
mosquito
infection
rate
method

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Insect Science
  • veterinary(all)

Cite this

ELISA absorbance cut-off method affects malaria sporozoite rate determination in wild Afrotropical Anopheles. / Beier, John C; Asiago, C. M.; Onyango, F. K.; Koros, J. K.

In: Medical and Veterinary Entomology, Vol. 2, No. 3, 01.07.1988, p. 259-264.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2cc78d7114394088a2b873857d4ded41,
title = "ELISA absorbance cut-off method affects malaria sporozoite rate determination in wild Afrotropical Anopheles.",
abstract = "Malaria sporozoite infection rates in a mixed species group of 244 Anopheles gambiae Giles sensu lato and 115 An.funestus Giles wild female mosquitoes were compared using three methods to determine cut-off absorbance values for positivity of a Plasmodium falciparum Welch enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Positive controls were based on P.falciparum circumsporozoite protein. As negative controls, four wild male Anopheles were included on each microtitre plate; tests were repeated on four consecutive days for each plate. Infection rates were estimated at 13.1-22.8{\%} using the mean absorbance value of negative controls plus three standard deviations, 11.7-12.8{\%} using double the mean and 12.5-13.6{\%} using the fixed cut-off value of 0.20 (allowing for 20{\%} variation in negative control absorbance values). Observed agreement for positivity or negativity among samples tested four times was 98.6{\%} for the 2 x mean method, 97.2{\%} for the fixed cut-off 0.20 value, but only 82.7{\%} for the mean + 3 SD method. It was concluded that the 2x mean cut-off method is most reliable for field studies. P.falciparum sporozoite rates of 12.2{\%} in An.funestus and 11.9{\%} in An.gambiae s.l. were thus determined on the basis of the 2x mean cut-off method. This comparative evaluation demonstrates that vector infectivity rates can be seriously over-estimated from sporozoite ELISA tests, by as much as 87{\%} in one case considered here, depending on the absorbance cut-off method applied for negative controls.",
author = "Beier, {John C} and Asiago, {C. M.} and Onyango, {F. K.} and Koros, {J. K.}",
year = "1988",
month = "7",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "259--264",
journal = "Medical and Veterinary Entomology",
issn = "0269-283X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ELISA absorbance cut-off method affects malaria sporozoite rate determination in wild Afrotropical Anopheles.

AU - Beier, John C

AU - Asiago, C. M.

AU - Onyango, F. K.

AU - Koros, J. K.

PY - 1988/7/1

Y1 - 1988/7/1

N2 - Malaria sporozoite infection rates in a mixed species group of 244 Anopheles gambiae Giles sensu lato and 115 An.funestus Giles wild female mosquitoes were compared using three methods to determine cut-off absorbance values for positivity of a Plasmodium falciparum Welch enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Positive controls were based on P.falciparum circumsporozoite protein. As negative controls, four wild male Anopheles were included on each microtitre plate; tests were repeated on four consecutive days for each plate. Infection rates were estimated at 13.1-22.8% using the mean absorbance value of negative controls plus three standard deviations, 11.7-12.8% using double the mean and 12.5-13.6% using the fixed cut-off value of 0.20 (allowing for 20% variation in negative control absorbance values). Observed agreement for positivity or negativity among samples tested four times was 98.6% for the 2 x mean method, 97.2% for the fixed cut-off 0.20 value, but only 82.7% for the mean + 3 SD method. It was concluded that the 2x mean cut-off method is most reliable for field studies. P.falciparum sporozoite rates of 12.2% in An.funestus and 11.9% in An.gambiae s.l. were thus determined on the basis of the 2x mean cut-off method. This comparative evaluation demonstrates that vector infectivity rates can be seriously over-estimated from sporozoite ELISA tests, by as much as 87% in one case considered here, depending on the absorbance cut-off method applied for negative controls.

AB - Malaria sporozoite infection rates in a mixed species group of 244 Anopheles gambiae Giles sensu lato and 115 An.funestus Giles wild female mosquitoes were compared using three methods to determine cut-off absorbance values for positivity of a Plasmodium falciparum Welch enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Positive controls were based on P.falciparum circumsporozoite protein. As negative controls, four wild male Anopheles were included on each microtitre plate; tests were repeated on four consecutive days for each plate. Infection rates were estimated at 13.1-22.8% using the mean absorbance value of negative controls plus three standard deviations, 11.7-12.8% using double the mean and 12.5-13.6% using the fixed cut-off value of 0.20 (allowing for 20% variation in negative control absorbance values). Observed agreement for positivity or negativity among samples tested four times was 98.6% for the 2 x mean method, 97.2% for the fixed cut-off 0.20 value, but only 82.7% for the mean + 3 SD method. It was concluded that the 2x mean cut-off method is most reliable for field studies. P.falciparum sporozoite rates of 12.2% in An.funestus and 11.9% in An.gambiae s.l. were thus determined on the basis of the 2x mean cut-off method. This comparative evaluation demonstrates that vector infectivity rates can be seriously over-estimated from sporozoite ELISA tests, by as much as 87% in one case considered here, depending on the absorbance cut-off method applied for negative controls.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024035259&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024035259&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 259

EP - 264

JO - Medical and Veterinary Entomology

JF - Medical and Veterinary Entomology

SN - 0269-283X

IS - 3

ER -