Elder abuse: How the moderns mistreat classical realism

Joseph M. Parent, Joshua M. Baron

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

Neorealists narrate their origins by explaining that classical realists committed a multitude of sins and were therefore displaced. The classics unscientifically explained world politics primarily through individual-level characteristics, typically a will to power that drove state behavior and international outcomes. In short, classical realism was inadequately structural and theoretical; thus, neorealists revised them by prioritizing structural factors and putting the paradigm on sound scientific footing. We argue that this narrative is generally incorrect. Classical realists were supremely structural and competently theoretical. Consequently, the realist tradition has much more continuity and richness than presently believed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)193-213
Number of pages21
JournalInternational Studies Review
Volume13
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2011

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Political Science and International Relations

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Elder abuse: How the moderns mistreat classical realism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this