Effects of Mental Practice, Physical Practice, and Knowledge of Results on Piano Performance

Don Coffman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

56 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this study, the author examined the effects of type of practice (physical, mental, I alternating physical/mental, and a motivational control) and aural knowledge of results on improving piano performance. Forty music education and music therapy majors participated in a pretest and posttest experiment using one of eight treatment conditions. The dependent variables were performance time, number of pitch errors, and number of rhythm errors. Results revealed that (a) all three practice conditions had significantly shorter performance times than did the control condition, (b) treatments using physical practice and alternating mental/physical practice yielded significantly shorter performance times than did the mental practice treatment alone, and (c) the physical practice treatment did not differ significantly from the alternating mental/physical practicel treatment in improving performance times. No other statistically significant differences were found among the three practice conditions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)187-196
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Research in Music Education
Volume38
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1990
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

performance
music therapy
music lessons
Physical
Piano Performance
time
experiment
Music Therapy
Posttests
Aural
Rhythm
Music Education
Experiment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Music

Cite this

Effects of Mental Practice, Physical Practice, and Knowledge of Results on Piano Performance. / Coffman, Don.

In: Journal of Research in Music Education, Vol. 38, No. 3, 1990, p. 187-196.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6b6c81ae1c574fdfab80d5759da25ba3,
title = "Effects of Mental Practice, Physical Practice, and Knowledge of Results on Piano Performance",
abstract = "In this study, the author examined the effects of type of practice (physical, mental, I alternating physical/mental, and a motivational control) and aural knowledge of results on improving piano performance. Forty music education and music therapy majors participated in a pretest and posttest experiment using one of eight treatment conditions. The dependent variables were performance time, number of pitch errors, and number of rhythm errors. Results revealed that (a) all three practice conditions had significantly shorter performance times than did the control condition, (b) treatments using physical practice and alternating mental/physical practice yielded significantly shorter performance times than did the mental practice treatment alone, and (c) the physical practice treatment did not differ significantly from the alternating mental/physical practicel treatment in improving performance times. No other statistically significant differences were found among the three practice conditions.",
author = "Don Coffman",
year = "1990",
doi = "10.2307/3345182",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "187--196",
journal = "Journal of Research in Music Education",
issn = "0022-4294",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of Mental Practice, Physical Practice, and Knowledge of Results on Piano Performance

AU - Coffman, Don

PY - 1990

Y1 - 1990

N2 - In this study, the author examined the effects of type of practice (physical, mental, I alternating physical/mental, and a motivational control) and aural knowledge of results on improving piano performance. Forty music education and music therapy majors participated in a pretest and posttest experiment using one of eight treatment conditions. The dependent variables were performance time, number of pitch errors, and number of rhythm errors. Results revealed that (a) all three practice conditions had significantly shorter performance times than did the control condition, (b) treatments using physical practice and alternating mental/physical practice yielded significantly shorter performance times than did the mental practice treatment alone, and (c) the physical practice treatment did not differ significantly from the alternating mental/physical practicel treatment in improving performance times. No other statistically significant differences were found among the three practice conditions.

AB - In this study, the author examined the effects of type of practice (physical, mental, I alternating physical/mental, and a motivational control) and aural knowledge of results on improving piano performance. Forty music education and music therapy majors participated in a pretest and posttest experiment using one of eight treatment conditions. The dependent variables were performance time, number of pitch errors, and number of rhythm errors. Results revealed that (a) all three practice conditions had significantly shorter performance times than did the control condition, (b) treatments using physical practice and alternating mental/physical practice yielded significantly shorter performance times than did the mental practice treatment alone, and (c) the physical practice treatment did not differ significantly from the alternating mental/physical practicel treatment in improving performance times. No other statistically significant differences were found among the three practice conditions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84970393138&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84970393138&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2307/3345182

DO - 10.2307/3345182

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84970393138

VL - 38

SP - 187

EP - 196

JO - Journal of Research in Music Education

JF - Journal of Research in Music Education

SN - 0022-4294

IS - 3

ER -