Effects of adductor muscle stimulation on speech in abductor spasmodic dysphonia

Kimberly A. Bidus, Giovana Thomas, Christy L. Ludlow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether adductor laryngeal muscle stimulation might be a beneficial treatment alternative for abductor spasmodic dysphonia (ABSD). Study Design: Baseline comparisons were made on measures of voiceless consonant and syllable duration between patients with ABSD and normal control subjects, and speech and voice production with and without muscle stimulation were compared within 10 patients with ABSD. Methods Baseline group comparisons were conducted on measures of syllable and voiceless consonant duration between the patients and the control subjects. Neuromuscular stimulation was applied to the thyroarytenoid or lateral cricoarytenoid muscles in the patients during extended phonation, and measures were made of fundamental frequency and sound pressure level in the stimulated and nonstimulated conditions. Voiceless consonant duration was compared with and without adductor laryngeal muscle stimulation daring syllable repetitions and sentences in the patients. Results: Before stimulation, the patients had increased syllable durations in comparison with control subjects (P = .003). Repeated within-patient comparisons with and without stimulation demonstrated significant (P < .008) reductions in voiceless consonant durations during syllable repetition. The more severely affected patients had the greatest reductions in voiceless consonant duration during sentence production. Conclusions: Adductor muscle stimulation improved speech production in patients with ABSD, and the improvement was greatest in the most severely affected patients. Therefore adductor muscle stimulation has potential for benefiting patients with ABSD.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1943-1949
Number of pages7
JournalLaryngoscope
Volume110
Issue number11
StatePublished - Nov 23 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dysphonia
Muscles
Laryngeal Muscles
Phonation

Keywords

  • Muscle stimulation
  • Spasmodic dysphonia
  • Voice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Effects of adductor muscle stimulation on speech in abductor spasmodic dysphonia. / Bidus, Kimberly A.; Thomas, Giovana; Ludlow, Christy L.

In: Laryngoscope, Vol. 110, No. 11, 23.11.2000, p. 1943-1949.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bidus, Kimberly A. ; Thomas, Giovana ; Ludlow, Christy L. / Effects of adductor muscle stimulation on speech in abductor spasmodic dysphonia. In: Laryngoscope. 2000 ; Vol. 110, No. 11. pp. 1943-1949.
@article{f22baa7943d14ac7a1067019a829d47e,
title = "Effects of adductor muscle stimulation on speech in abductor spasmodic dysphonia",
abstract = "Objective: To determine whether adductor laryngeal muscle stimulation might be a beneficial treatment alternative for abductor spasmodic dysphonia (ABSD). Study Design: Baseline comparisons were made on measures of voiceless consonant and syllable duration between patients with ABSD and normal control subjects, and speech and voice production with and without muscle stimulation were compared within 10 patients with ABSD. Methods Baseline group comparisons were conducted on measures of syllable and voiceless consonant duration between the patients and the control subjects. Neuromuscular stimulation was applied to the thyroarytenoid or lateral cricoarytenoid muscles in the patients during extended phonation, and measures were made of fundamental frequency and sound pressure level in the stimulated and nonstimulated conditions. Voiceless consonant duration was compared with and without adductor laryngeal muscle stimulation daring syllable repetitions and sentences in the patients. Results: Before stimulation, the patients had increased syllable durations in comparison with control subjects (P = .003). Repeated within-patient comparisons with and without stimulation demonstrated significant (P < .008) reductions in voiceless consonant durations during syllable repetition. The more severely affected patients had the greatest reductions in voiceless consonant duration during sentence production. Conclusions: Adductor muscle stimulation improved speech production in patients with ABSD, and the improvement was greatest in the most severely affected patients. Therefore adductor muscle stimulation has potential for benefiting patients with ABSD.",
keywords = "Muscle stimulation, Spasmodic dysphonia, Voice",
author = "Bidus, {Kimberly A.} and Giovana Thomas and Ludlow, {Christy L.}",
year = "2000",
month = "11",
day = "23",
language = "English",
volume = "110",
pages = "1943--1949",
journal = "Laryngoscope",
issn = "0023-852X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of adductor muscle stimulation on speech in abductor spasmodic dysphonia

AU - Bidus, Kimberly A.

AU - Thomas, Giovana

AU - Ludlow, Christy L.

PY - 2000/11/23

Y1 - 2000/11/23

N2 - Objective: To determine whether adductor laryngeal muscle stimulation might be a beneficial treatment alternative for abductor spasmodic dysphonia (ABSD). Study Design: Baseline comparisons were made on measures of voiceless consonant and syllable duration between patients with ABSD and normal control subjects, and speech and voice production with and without muscle stimulation were compared within 10 patients with ABSD. Methods Baseline group comparisons were conducted on measures of syllable and voiceless consonant duration between the patients and the control subjects. Neuromuscular stimulation was applied to the thyroarytenoid or lateral cricoarytenoid muscles in the patients during extended phonation, and measures were made of fundamental frequency and sound pressure level in the stimulated and nonstimulated conditions. Voiceless consonant duration was compared with and without adductor laryngeal muscle stimulation daring syllable repetitions and sentences in the patients. Results: Before stimulation, the patients had increased syllable durations in comparison with control subjects (P = .003). Repeated within-patient comparisons with and without stimulation demonstrated significant (P < .008) reductions in voiceless consonant durations during syllable repetition. The more severely affected patients had the greatest reductions in voiceless consonant duration during sentence production. Conclusions: Adductor muscle stimulation improved speech production in patients with ABSD, and the improvement was greatest in the most severely affected patients. Therefore adductor muscle stimulation has potential for benefiting patients with ABSD.

AB - Objective: To determine whether adductor laryngeal muscle stimulation might be a beneficial treatment alternative for abductor spasmodic dysphonia (ABSD). Study Design: Baseline comparisons were made on measures of voiceless consonant and syllable duration between patients with ABSD and normal control subjects, and speech and voice production with and without muscle stimulation were compared within 10 patients with ABSD. Methods Baseline group comparisons were conducted on measures of syllable and voiceless consonant duration between the patients and the control subjects. Neuromuscular stimulation was applied to the thyroarytenoid or lateral cricoarytenoid muscles in the patients during extended phonation, and measures were made of fundamental frequency and sound pressure level in the stimulated and nonstimulated conditions. Voiceless consonant duration was compared with and without adductor laryngeal muscle stimulation daring syllable repetitions and sentences in the patients. Results: Before stimulation, the patients had increased syllable durations in comparison with control subjects (P = .003). Repeated within-patient comparisons with and without stimulation demonstrated significant (P < .008) reductions in voiceless consonant durations during syllable repetition. The more severely affected patients had the greatest reductions in voiceless consonant duration during sentence production. Conclusions: Adductor muscle stimulation improved speech production in patients with ABSD, and the improvement was greatest in the most severely affected patients. Therefore adductor muscle stimulation has potential for benefiting patients with ABSD.

KW - Muscle stimulation

KW - Spasmodic dysphonia

KW - Voice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033756683&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033756683&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11081615

AN - SCOPUS:0033756683

VL - 110

SP - 1943

EP - 1949

JO - Laryngoscope

JF - Laryngoscope

SN - 0023-852X

IS - 11

ER -