Effect of variable loading in the determination of upper-limb anaerobic power in persons with tetraplegia

Patrick L. Jacobs, Brad M. Johnson, Edward T. Mahoney, Andrew B. Carter, Gabriel A. Somarriba

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines the effects of levels of resistance loading during arm Wingate Anaerobic Testing (WAnT) in persons with differing levels of cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). Thirty-nine persons with motor-complete SCI tetraplegia (13 each at C5, C6, and C7) performed six bouts of arm-crank WAnT with relative loads equivalent to 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, and 3.5 percent of body mass (BM). Power output was determined with the use of the SMI OptoSensor 2000 (Sports Medicine Industries, Inc., St. Cloud, MN, USA) hardware and software package. Values of peak power (Ppeak) and mean power (P mean) were examined statistically between groups (C5, C5, and C7) and across levels of resistance loading. Resistance loads that provided the greatest values of Pmean for the three groups were as follows: C5 = 1.0 or 1.5 percent of BM; C6 = 1.5 or 2.0 percent of BM; and C7 = 2.5, 3.0, or 3.5 percent of BM. Appropriate loading for arm WAnT is specific to the level of tetraplegia and may provide a useful assessment of upper limb power production.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)9-14
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Rehabilitation Research and Development
Volume41
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Quadriplegia
Upper Extremity
Arm
Spinal Cord Injuries
Testing
Sports medicine
Sports Medicine
Software packages
Computer hardware
Industry
Software

Keywords

  • Anaerobic
  • Power
  • Spinal cord injury
  • Tetraplegia
  • Wingate

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Jacobs, P. L., Johnson, B. M., Mahoney, E. T., Carter, A. B., & Somarriba, G. A. (2004). Effect of variable loading in the determination of upper-limb anaerobic power in persons with tetraplegia. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 41(1), 9-14.

Effect of variable loading in the determination of upper-limb anaerobic power in persons with tetraplegia. / Jacobs, Patrick L.; Johnson, Brad M.; Mahoney, Edward T.; Carter, Andrew B.; Somarriba, Gabriel A.

In: Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, Vol. 41, No. 1, 01.01.2004, p. 9-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jacobs, Patrick L. ; Johnson, Brad M. ; Mahoney, Edward T. ; Carter, Andrew B. ; Somarriba, Gabriel A. / Effect of variable loading in the determination of upper-limb anaerobic power in persons with tetraplegia. In: Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. 2004 ; Vol. 41, No. 1. pp. 9-14.
@article{80f8dada65ad453f8bc1a5e9b9fbe5f5,
title = "Effect of variable loading in the determination of upper-limb anaerobic power in persons with tetraplegia",
abstract = "This article examines the effects of levels of resistance loading during arm Wingate Anaerobic Testing (WAnT) in persons with differing levels of cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). Thirty-nine persons with motor-complete SCI tetraplegia (13 each at C5, C6, and C7) performed six bouts of arm-crank WAnT with relative loads equivalent to 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, and 3.5 percent of body mass (BM). Power output was determined with the use of the SMI OptoSensor 2000 (Sports Medicine Industries, Inc., St. Cloud, MN, USA) hardware and software package. Values of peak power (Ppeak) and mean power (P mean) were examined statistically between groups (C5, C5, and C7) and across levels of resistance loading. Resistance loads that provided the greatest values of Pmean for the three groups were as follows: C5 = 1.0 or 1.5 percent of BM; C6 = 1.5 or 2.0 percent of BM; and C7 = 2.5, 3.0, or 3.5 percent of BM. Appropriate loading for arm WAnT is specific to the level of tetraplegia and may provide a useful assessment of upper limb power production.",
keywords = "Anaerobic, Power, Spinal cord injury, Tetraplegia, Wingate",
author = "Jacobs, {Patrick L.} and Johnson, {Brad M.} and Mahoney, {Edward T.} and Carter, {Andrew B.} and Somarriba, {Gabriel A.}",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "9--14",
journal = "Journal of rehabilitation R&D",
issn = "0748-7711",
publisher = "Rehabilitation Research and Development Service",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of variable loading in the determination of upper-limb anaerobic power in persons with tetraplegia

AU - Jacobs, Patrick L.

AU - Johnson, Brad M.

AU - Mahoney, Edward T.

AU - Carter, Andrew B.

AU - Somarriba, Gabriel A.

PY - 2004/1/1

Y1 - 2004/1/1

N2 - This article examines the effects of levels of resistance loading during arm Wingate Anaerobic Testing (WAnT) in persons with differing levels of cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). Thirty-nine persons with motor-complete SCI tetraplegia (13 each at C5, C6, and C7) performed six bouts of arm-crank WAnT with relative loads equivalent to 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, and 3.5 percent of body mass (BM). Power output was determined with the use of the SMI OptoSensor 2000 (Sports Medicine Industries, Inc., St. Cloud, MN, USA) hardware and software package. Values of peak power (Ppeak) and mean power (P mean) were examined statistically between groups (C5, C5, and C7) and across levels of resistance loading. Resistance loads that provided the greatest values of Pmean for the three groups were as follows: C5 = 1.0 or 1.5 percent of BM; C6 = 1.5 or 2.0 percent of BM; and C7 = 2.5, 3.0, or 3.5 percent of BM. Appropriate loading for arm WAnT is specific to the level of tetraplegia and may provide a useful assessment of upper limb power production.

AB - This article examines the effects of levels of resistance loading during arm Wingate Anaerobic Testing (WAnT) in persons with differing levels of cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). Thirty-nine persons with motor-complete SCI tetraplegia (13 each at C5, C6, and C7) performed six bouts of arm-crank WAnT with relative loads equivalent to 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, and 3.5 percent of body mass (BM). Power output was determined with the use of the SMI OptoSensor 2000 (Sports Medicine Industries, Inc., St. Cloud, MN, USA) hardware and software package. Values of peak power (Ppeak) and mean power (P mean) were examined statistically between groups (C5, C5, and C7) and across levels of resistance loading. Resistance loads that provided the greatest values of Pmean for the three groups were as follows: C5 = 1.0 or 1.5 percent of BM; C6 = 1.5 or 2.0 percent of BM; and C7 = 2.5, 3.0, or 3.5 percent of BM. Appropriate loading for arm WAnT is specific to the level of tetraplegia and may provide a useful assessment of upper limb power production.

KW - Anaerobic

KW - Power

KW - Spinal cord injury

KW - Tetraplegia

KW - Wingate

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1542344356&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1542344356&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 15273893

AN - SCOPUS:1542344356

VL - 41

SP - 9

EP - 14

JO - Journal of rehabilitation R&D

JF - Journal of rehabilitation R&D

SN - 0748-7711

IS - 1

ER -