Effect of Regret on Post-choice Valuation: The Case of More Than Two Alternatives

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The author examines the influence of experienced regret on the selection of the reference point used in post-choice valuation. He incorporates two reference points, expected performance and performance of the forgone alternative, the former affecting the amount of satisfaction and the latter affecting the amount of regret experienced by a decision maker. Prior research on regret has assumed only a two-alternative choice set with the forgone alternative being the reference point for measuring regret. The author relaxes that assumption and develops hypotheses to examine the selection of the reference point in cases that more closely represent real-life experience (i.e., choice sets with more than two alternatives). Two studies are reported. The results from the first study support most of the hypotheses. The second study further investigated the selection of a reference point. Several theoretical and managerial implications are discussed and future research directions are suggested.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)48-69
Number of pages22
JournalOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Volume76
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Emotions
Reference point
Research
Choice sets

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Strategy and Management
  • Psychology(all)
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

@article{d119d67cda2f426784bc890fa37e6be4,
title = "Effect of Regret on Post-choice Valuation: The Case of More Than Two Alternatives",
abstract = "The author examines the influence of experienced regret on the selection of the reference point used in post-choice valuation. He incorporates two reference points, expected performance and performance of the forgone alternative, the former affecting the amount of satisfaction and the latter affecting the amount of regret experienced by a decision maker. Prior research on regret has assumed only a two-alternative choice set with the forgone alternative being the reference point for measuring regret. The author relaxes that assumption and develops hypotheses to examine the selection of the reference point in cases that more closely represent real-life experience (i.e., choice sets with more than two alternatives). Two studies are reported. The results from the first study support most of the hypotheses. The second study further investigated the selection of a reference point. Several theoretical and managerial implications are discussed and future research directions are suggested.",
author = "Michael Tsiros",
year = "1998",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1006/obhd.1998.2793",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "76",
pages = "48--69",
journal = "Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes",
issn = "0749-5978",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of Regret on Post-choice Valuation

T2 - The Case of More Than Two Alternatives

AU - Tsiros, Michael

PY - 1998/10

Y1 - 1998/10

N2 - The author examines the influence of experienced regret on the selection of the reference point used in post-choice valuation. He incorporates two reference points, expected performance and performance of the forgone alternative, the former affecting the amount of satisfaction and the latter affecting the amount of regret experienced by a decision maker. Prior research on regret has assumed only a two-alternative choice set with the forgone alternative being the reference point for measuring regret. The author relaxes that assumption and develops hypotheses to examine the selection of the reference point in cases that more closely represent real-life experience (i.e., choice sets with more than two alternatives). Two studies are reported. The results from the first study support most of the hypotheses. The second study further investigated the selection of a reference point. Several theoretical and managerial implications are discussed and future research directions are suggested.

AB - The author examines the influence of experienced regret on the selection of the reference point used in post-choice valuation. He incorporates two reference points, expected performance and performance of the forgone alternative, the former affecting the amount of satisfaction and the latter affecting the amount of regret experienced by a decision maker. Prior research on regret has assumed only a two-alternative choice set with the forgone alternative being the reference point for measuring regret. The author relaxes that assumption and develops hypotheses to examine the selection of the reference point in cases that more closely represent real-life experience (i.e., choice sets with more than two alternatives). Two studies are reported. The results from the first study support most of the hypotheses. The second study further investigated the selection of a reference point. Several theoretical and managerial implications are discussed and future research directions are suggested.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0002487474&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0002487474&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1006/obhd.1998.2793

DO - 10.1006/obhd.1998.2793

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0002487474

VL - 76

SP - 48

EP - 69

JO - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

JF - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

SN - 0749-5978

IS - 1

ER -