Effect of practice on standardised learning outcomes in simulation-based medical education

William C. McGaghie, Barry Issenberg, Emil R. Petrusa, Ross Scalese

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

195 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This report synthesises a subset of 31 journal articles on high-fidelity simulation-based medical education containing 32 research studies drawn from a larger qualitative review published previously. These studies were selected because they present adequate data to allow for quantitative synthesis. We hypothesised an association between hours of practice in simulation-based medical education and standardised learning outcomes measured as weighted effect sizes. METHODS: Journal articles were screened using 5 exclusion and inclusion criteria. Response data were extracted and 3 judges independently coded each study. Learning outcomes were standardised using a common metric, the average weighted effect size (AWES), due to the heterogeneity of response measures in individual studies. ANOVA was used to evaluate AWES differences due to hours of practice on a high-fidelity medical simulator cast in 5 categories. The eta squared (η2) statistic was used to assess the association between AWES and simulator practice hours. RESULTS: There is a strong association (η2 = 0.46) between hours of practice on high-fidelity medical simulators and standardised learning outcomes. The association approximates a dose-response relationship. CONCLUSIONS: Hours of high-fidelity simulator practice have a positive, functional relationship with standardised learning outcomes in medical education. More rigorous research methods and more stringent journal editorial policies are needed to advance this field of medical education research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)792-797
Number of pages6
JournalMedical Education
Volume40
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2006

Fingerprint

Medical Education
Learning
simulation
learning
education
Editorial Policies
Research
Biomedical Research
Analysis of Variance
research method
exclusion
statistics
inclusion

Keywords

  • Clinical competence/*standards
  • Education, medical, undergraduate/*methods
  • Feedback, psychological
  • Learning
  • Teaching materials
  • Teaching/ *methods
  • United States

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Education
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Effect of practice on standardised learning outcomes in simulation-based medical education. / McGaghie, William C.; Issenberg, Barry; Petrusa, Emil R.; Scalese, Ross.

In: Medical Education, Vol. 40, No. 8, 01.08.2006, p. 792-797.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cefa711e289c4f97b1351f030c20dea6,
title = "Effect of practice on standardised learning outcomes in simulation-based medical education",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: This report synthesises a subset of 31 journal articles on high-fidelity simulation-based medical education containing 32 research studies drawn from a larger qualitative review published previously. These studies were selected because they present adequate data to allow for quantitative synthesis. We hypothesised an association between hours of practice in simulation-based medical education and standardised learning outcomes measured as weighted effect sizes. METHODS: Journal articles were screened using 5 exclusion and inclusion criteria. Response data were extracted and 3 judges independently coded each study. Learning outcomes were standardised using a common metric, the average weighted effect size (AWES), due to the heterogeneity of response measures in individual studies. ANOVA was used to evaluate AWES differences due to hours of practice on a high-fidelity medical simulator cast in 5 categories. The eta squared (η2) statistic was used to assess the association between AWES and simulator practice hours. RESULTS: There is a strong association (η2 = 0.46) between hours of practice on high-fidelity medical simulators and standardised learning outcomes. The association approximates a dose-response relationship. CONCLUSIONS: Hours of high-fidelity simulator practice have a positive, functional relationship with standardised learning outcomes in medical education. More rigorous research methods and more stringent journal editorial policies are needed to advance this field of medical education research.",
keywords = "Clinical competence/*standards, Education, medical, undergraduate/*methods, Feedback, psychological, Learning, Teaching materials, Teaching/ *methods, United States",
author = "McGaghie, {William C.} and Barry Issenberg and Petrusa, {Emil R.} and Ross Scalese",
year = "2006",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02528.x",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "792--797",
journal = "Medical Education",
issn = "0308-0110",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of practice on standardised learning outcomes in simulation-based medical education

AU - McGaghie, William C.

AU - Issenberg, Barry

AU - Petrusa, Emil R.

AU - Scalese, Ross

PY - 2006/8/1

Y1 - 2006/8/1

N2 - OBJECTIVES: This report synthesises a subset of 31 journal articles on high-fidelity simulation-based medical education containing 32 research studies drawn from a larger qualitative review published previously. These studies were selected because they present adequate data to allow for quantitative synthesis. We hypothesised an association between hours of practice in simulation-based medical education and standardised learning outcomes measured as weighted effect sizes. METHODS: Journal articles were screened using 5 exclusion and inclusion criteria. Response data were extracted and 3 judges independently coded each study. Learning outcomes were standardised using a common metric, the average weighted effect size (AWES), due to the heterogeneity of response measures in individual studies. ANOVA was used to evaluate AWES differences due to hours of practice on a high-fidelity medical simulator cast in 5 categories. The eta squared (η2) statistic was used to assess the association between AWES and simulator practice hours. RESULTS: There is a strong association (η2 = 0.46) between hours of practice on high-fidelity medical simulators and standardised learning outcomes. The association approximates a dose-response relationship. CONCLUSIONS: Hours of high-fidelity simulator practice have a positive, functional relationship with standardised learning outcomes in medical education. More rigorous research methods and more stringent journal editorial policies are needed to advance this field of medical education research.

AB - OBJECTIVES: This report synthesises a subset of 31 journal articles on high-fidelity simulation-based medical education containing 32 research studies drawn from a larger qualitative review published previously. These studies were selected because they present adequate data to allow for quantitative synthesis. We hypothesised an association between hours of practice in simulation-based medical education and standardised learning outcomes measured as weighted effect sizes. METHODS: Journal articles were screened using 5 exclusion and inclusion criteria. Response data were extracted and 3 judges independently coded each study. Learning outcomes were standardised using a common metric, the average weighted effect size (AWES), due to the heterogeneity of response measures in individual studies. ANOVA was used to evaluate AWES differences due to hours of practice on a high-fidelity medical simulator cast in 5 categories. The eta squared (η2) statistic was used to assess the association between AWES and simulator practice hours. RESULTS: There is a strong association (η2 = 0.46) between hours of practice on high-fidelity medical simulators and standardised learning outcomes. The association approximates a dose-response relationship. CONCLUSIONS: Hours of high-fidelity simulator practice have a positive, functional relationship with standardised learning outcomes in medical education. More rigorous research methods and more stringent journal editorial policies are needed to advance this field of medical education research.

KW - Clinical competence/standards

KW - Education, medical, undergraduate/methods

KW - Feedback, psychological

KW - Learning

KW - Teaching materials

KW - Teaching/ methods

KW - United States

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33746573845&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33746573845&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02528.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02528.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 16869926

AN - SCOPUS:33746573845

VL - 40

SP - 792

EP - 797

JO - Medical Education

JF - Medical Education

SN - 0308-0110

IS - 8

ER -