Effect of physiologic and pharmacologic adrenergic stimulation on heart rate variability

Mirza W. Ahmed, Alan H. Kadish, Michele A. Parker, Jeffrey Goldberger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

108 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effects of physiologic and pharmacologic sympathetic stimulation on time and frequency domain indexes of heart rate variability. Background. Measurements of heart rate variability have been used as indexes of sympathetic tone. To date, the effects of circulating catecholamines on heart rate variability have not been evaluated. Methods. Fourteen normal subjects (eight men, six women, mean (± SD) age 28.5 ± 48 years) were evaluated. Five-minute electrocardiographic recordings were obtained in triplicate after physiologic and pharmacologic sympathetic stimulation: during upright tilt, after maximal exercise, during epinephrine and isoproterenol infusions at 50 ng/kg body weight per min, during beta-adrenergic blockade and during combined beta-adrenergic and parasympathetic blockade. Results. Beta-adrenergic stimulation resulted in a significant decrease in time domain measures of heart rate variability. The frequency domain indexes showed variable responses, depending on the individual stimulus. Tilt caused an increase in low frequency power and in the ratio of low to high frequency power. These changes were not necessarily observed with other conditions of beta-adrenergic stimulation. Double blockade suppressed baseline heart rate variability, but beta-adrenergic blockade had no significant effect. Time domain measures of heart rate variability demonstrated excellent reproducibility over the three recordings, but the frequency domain variables demonstrated fair to excellent reproducibility. Conclusions. These findings suggest that different modes of beta-adrenergic stimulation may result in divergent heart rate variability responses. Thus, current heart rate variability techniques cannot be used as general indexes of "sympthetic" tone. Studies utilizing heart rate variability to quantify sympathetic tone need to consider this.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1082-1090
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume24
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Adrenergic Agents
Heart Rate
Isoproterenol
Epinephrine
Catecholamines
Body Weight
Exercise

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Effect of physiologic and pharmacologic adrenergic stimulation on heart rate variability. / Ahmed, Mirza W.; Kadish, Alan H.; Parker, Michele A.; Goldberger, Jeffrey.

In: Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Vol. 24, No. 4, 01.01.1994, p. 1082-1090.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d875da7ab67c4506876a34072dfa224b,
title = "Effect of physiologic and pharmacologic adrenergic stimulation on heart rate variability",
abstract = "Objectives. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effects of physiologic and pharmacologic sympathetic stimulation on time and frequency domain indexes of heart rate variability. Background. Measurements of heart rate variability have been used as indexes of sympathetic tone. To date, the effects of circulating catecholamines on heart rate variability have not been evaluated. Methods. Fourteen normal subjects (eight men, six women, mean (± SD) age 28.5 ± 48 years) were evaluated. Five-minute electrocardiographic recordings were obtained in triplicate after physiologic and pharmacologic sympathetic stimulation: during upright tilt, after maximal exercise, during epinephrine and isoproterenol infusions at 50 ng/kg body weight per min, during beta-adrenergic blockade and during combined beta-adrenergic and parasympathetic blockade. Results. Beta-adrenergic stimulation resulted in a significant decrease in time domain measures of heart rate variability. The frequency domain indexes showed variable responses, depending on the individual stimulus. Tilt caused an increase in low frequency power and in the ratio of low to high frequency power. These changes were not necessarily observed with other conditions of beta-adrenergic stimulation. Double blockade suppressed baseline heart rate variability, but beta-adrenergic blockade had no significant effect. Time domain measures of heart rate variability demonstrated excellent reproducibility over the three recordings, but the frequency domain variables demonstrated fair to excellent reproducibility. Conclusions. These findings suggest that different modes of beta-adrenergic stimulation may result in divergent heart rate variability responses. Thus, current heart rate variability techniques cannot be used as general indexes of {"}sympthetic{"} tone. Studies utilizing heart rate variability to quantify sympathetic tone need to consider this.",
author = "Ahmed, {Mirza W.} and Kadish, {Alan H.} and Parker, {Michele A.} and Jeffrey Goldberger",
year = "1994",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/0735-1097(94)90874-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "1082--1090",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Cardiology",
issn = "0735-1097",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of physiologic and pharmacologic adrenergic stimulation on heart rate variability

AU - Ahmed, Mirza W.

AU - Kadish, Alan H.

AU - Parker, Michele A.

AU - Goldberger, Jeffrey

PY - 1994/1/1

Y1 - 1994/1/1

N2 - Objectives. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effects of physiologic and pharmacologic sympathetic stimulation on time and frequency domain indexes of heart rate variability. Background. Measurements of heart rate variability have been used as indexes of sympathetic tone. To date, the effects of circulating catecholamines on heart rate variability have not been evaluated. Methods. Fourteen normal subjects (eight men, six women, mean (± SD) age 28.5 ± 48 years) were evaluated. Five-minute electrocardiographic recordings were obtained in triplicate after physiologic and pharmacologic sympathetic stimulation: during upright tilt, after maximal exercise, during epinephrine and isoproterenol infusions at 50 ng/kg body weight per min, during beta-adrenergic blockade and during combined beta-adrenergic and parasympathetic blockade. Results. Beta-adrenergic stimulation resulted in a significant decrease in time domain measures of heart rate variability. The frequency domain indexes showed variable responses, depending on the individual stimulus. Tilt caused an increase in low frequency power and in the ratio of low to high frequency power. These changes were not necessarily observed with other conditions of beta-adrenergic stimulation. Double blockade suppressed baseline heart rate variability, but beta-adrenergic blockade had no significant effect. Time domain measures of heart rate variability demonstrated excellent reproducibility over the three recordings, but the frequency domain variables demonstrated fair to excellent reproducibility. Conclusions. These findings suggest that different modes of beta-adrenergic stimulation may result in divergent heart rate variability responses. Thus, current heart rate variability techniques cannot be used as general indexes of "sympthetic" tone. Studies utilizing heart rate variability to quantify sympathetic tone need to consider this.

AB - Objectives. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effects of physiologic and pharmacologic sympathetic stimulation on time and frequency domain indexes of heart rate variability. Background. Measurements of heart rate variability have been used as indexes of sympathetic tone. To date, the effects of circulating catecholamines on heart rate variability have not been evaluated. Methods. Fourteen normal subjects (eight men, six women, mean (± SD) age 28.5 ± 48 years) were evaluated. Five-minute electrocardiographic recordings were obtained in triplicate after physiologic and pharmacologic sympathetic stimulation: during upright tilt, after maximal exercise, during epinephrine and isoproterenol infusions at 50 ng/kg body weight per min, during beta-adrenergic blockade and during combined beta-adrenergic and parasympathetic blockade. Results. Beta-adrenergic stimulation resulted in a significant decrease in time domain measures of heart rate variability. The frequency domain indexes showed variable responses, depending on the individual stimulus. Tilt caused an increase in low frequency power and in the ratio of low to high frequency power. These changes were not necessarily observed with other conditions of beta-adrenergic stimulation. Double blockade suppressed baseline heart rate variability, but beta-adrenergic blockade had no significant effect. Time domain measures of heart rate variability demonstrated excellent reproducibility over the three recordings, but the frequency domain variables demonstrated fair to excellent reproducibility. Conclusions. These findings suggest that different modes of beta-adrenergic stimulation may result in divergent heart rate variability responses. Thus, current heart rate variability techniques cannot be used as general indexes of "sympthetic" tone. Studies utilizing heart rate variability to quantify sympathetic tone need to consider this.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028086487&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028086487&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90874-5

DO - 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90874-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 7930202

AN - SCOPUS:0028086487

VL - 24

SP - 1082

EP - 1090

JO - Journal of the American College of Cardiology

JF - Journal of the American College of Cardiology

SN - 0735-1097

IS - 4

ER -