Effect of ezetimibe/simvastatin vs atorvastatin on lowering levels of LDL-C and non-HDL-C, ApoB, and hs-CRP in patients with type 2 diabetes

Ruth S. Weinstock, Ronald B Goldberg, John R. Guyton, Theodore Mazzone, Adam Polis, Joanne E. Tomassini, Jianxin Lin, Arvind Shah, Andrew M. Tershakovec

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: In addition to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), apolipoprotein B (ApoB), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) are considered predictive for cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. Objective: To assess the proportion of T2DM patients with hypercholesterolemia who attained the optional target level of LDL-C (<70 mg/dL) and additionally non-HDL-C (<100 mg/dL), ApoB (<90 mg/dL), and hs-CRP (<2 mg/L), following treatment with ezetimibe/simvastatin (E/S) vs atorvastatin (A). Methods: This post-hoc analysis of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, 6-week parallel study assessed the proportion of T2DM patients who attained specified LDL-C levels and non-HDL-C, ApoB, and hs-CRP with usual, recommended starting doses of E/S (10/20 mg) vs A (10 or 20 mg) and next highest doses of E/S (10/40 mg) vs A (40 mg) by logistic regression. Baseline triglyceride and hs-CRP effects were also evaluated. Results: Significantly higher percentages of patients treated with E/S compared to A achieved individual and concurrent target levels of LDL-C (<70 mg/dL), non-HDL-C (<100 mg/dL), and ApoB (<90 mg/dL) at all dose comparisons (P < 0.05 to P < 0.001). Baseline triglyceride levels had no effect on reaching LDL-C levels. Attainment of non-HDL-C (<100 mg/dL), and ApoB (<90 mg/dL) was lower at triglycerides ≥200 mg/dL than <200 mg/dL. Achievement of hs-CRP level (<2 mg/L) was comparable for both treatments. Significantly more patients attained both LDL-C (<70 mg/dL) and hs-CRP (<2 mg/L) at all E/S doses compared to A (P < 0.05 to P < 0.001), regardless of baseline CRP levels. Conclusion: E/S provides a therapeutic option to T2DM patients for lowering not only LDL-C, but also non-HDL-C, ApoB, and hs-CRP. These factors may help guide assessment and treatment of cardiovascular disease risk in these patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)25-35
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Clinical Lipidology
Volume2
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2008

Fingerprint

Simvastatin
Apolipoproteins B
C-Reactive Protein
LDL Cholesterol
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Triglycerides
Cardiovascular Diseases
Therapeutics
Ezetimibe
lipoprotein cholesterol
Atorvastatin Calcium
Hypercholesterolemia
Logistic Models

Keywords

  • ApoB
  • Atorvastatin
  • Ezetimibe/simvastatin
  • Hs-CRP
  • LDL-C
  • Non-HDL-C

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Internal Medicine
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Cite this

Effect of ezetimibe/simvastatin vs atorvastatin on lowering levels of LDL-C and non-HDL-C, ApoB, and hs-CRP in patients with type 2 diabetes. / Weinstock, Ruth S.; Goldberg, Ronald B; Guyton, John R.; Mazzone, Theodore; Polis, Adam; Tomassini, Joanne E.; Lin, Jianxin; Shah, Arvind; Tershakovec, Andrew M.

In: Journal of Clinical Lipidology, Vol. 2, No. 1, 01.02.2008, p. 25-35.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Weinstock, Ruth S. ; Goldberg, Ronald B ; Guyton, John R. ; Mazzone, Theodore ; Polis, Adam ; Tomassini, Joanne E. ; Lin, Jianxin ; Shah, Arvind ; Tershakovec, Andrew M. / Effect of ezetimibe/simvastatin vs atorvastatin on lowering levels of LDL-C and non-HDL-C, ApoB, and hs-CRP in patients with type 2 diabetes. In: Journal of Clinical Lipidology. 2008 ; Vol. 2, No. 1. pp. 25-35.
@article{d68030c4f8e84373909ddb784b94843d,
title = "Effect of ezetimibe/simvastatin vs atorvastatin on lowering levels of LDL-C and non-HDL-C, ApoB, and hs-CRP in patients with type 2 diabetes",
abstract = "Background: In addition to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), apolipoprotein B (ApoB), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) are considered predictive for cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. Objective: To assess the proportion of T2DM patients with hypercholesterolemia who attained the optional target level of LDL-C (<70 mg/dL) and additionally non-HDL-C (<100 mg/dL), ApoB (<90 mg/dL), and hs-CRP (<2 mg/L), following treatment with ezetimibe/simvastatin (E/S) vs atorvastatin (A). Methods: This post-hoc analysis of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, 6-week parallel study assessed the proportion of T2DM patients who attained specified LDL-C levels and non-HDL-C, ApoB, and hs-CRP with usual, recommended starting doses of E/S (10/20 mg) vs A (10 or 20 mg) and next highest doses of E/S (10/40 mg) vs A (40 mg) by logistic regression. Baseline triglyceride and hs-CRP effects were also evaluated. Results: Significantly higher percentages of patients treated with E/S compared to A achieved individual and concurrent target levels of LDL-C (<70 mg/dL), non-HDL-C (<100 mg/dL), and ApoB (<90 mg/dL) at all dose comparisons (P < 0.05 to P < 0.001). Baseline triglyceride levels had no effect on reaching LDL-C levels. Attainment of non-HDL-C (<100 mg/dL), and ApoB (<90 mg/dL) was lower at triglycerides ≥200 mg/dL than <200 mg/dL. Achievement of hs-CRP level (<2 mg/L) was comparable for both treatments. Significantly more patients attained both LDL-C (<70 mg/dL) and hs-CRP (<2 mg/L) at all E/S doses compared to A (P < 0.05 to P < 0.001), regardless of baseline CRP levels. Conclusion: E/S provides a therapeutic option to T2DM patients for lowering not only LDL-C, but also non-HDL-C, ApoB, and hs-CRP. These factors may help guide assessment and treatment of cardiovascular disease risk in these patients.",
keywords = "ApoB, Atorvastatin, Ezetimibe/simvastatin, Hs-CRP, LDL-C, Non-HDL-C",
author = "Weinstock, {Ruth S.} and Goldberg, {Ronald B} and Guyton, {John R.} and Theodore Mazzone and Adam Polis and Tomassini, {Joanne E.} and Jianxin Lin and Arvind Shah and Tershakovec, {Andrew M.}",
year = "2008",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jacl.2008.01.001",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "25--35",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Lipidology",
issn = "1933-2874",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of ezetimibe/simvastatin vs atorvastatin on lowering levels of LDL-C and non-HDL-C, ApoB, and hs-CRP in patients with type 2 diabetes

AU - Weinstock, Ruth S.

AU - Goldberg, Ronald B

AU - Guyton, John R.

AU - Mazzone, Theodore

AU - Polis, Adam

AU - Tomassini, Joanne E.

AU - Lin, Jianxin

AU - Shah, Arvind

AU - Tershakovec, Andrew M.

PY - 2008/2/1

Y1 - 2008/2/1

N2 - Background: In addition to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), apolipoprotein B (ApoB), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) are considered predictive for cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. Objective: To assess the proportion of T2DM patients with hypercholesterolemia who attained the optional target level of LDL-C (<70 mg/dL) and additionally non-HDL-C (<100 mg/dL), ApoB (<90 mg/dL), and hs-CRP (<2 mg/L), following treatment with ezetimibe/simvastatin (E/S) vs atorvastatin (A). Methods: This post-hoc analysis of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, 6-week parallel study assessed the proportion of T2DM patients who attained specified LDL-C levels and non-HDL-C, ApoB, and hs-CRP with usual, recommended starting doses of E/S (10/20 mg) vs A (10 or 20 mg) and next highest doses of E/S (10/40 mg) vs A (40 mg) by logistic regression. Baseline triglyceride and hs-CRP effects were also evaluated. Results: Significantly higher percentages of patients treated with E/S compared to A achieved individual and concurrent target levels of LDL-C (<70 mg/dL), non-HDL-C (<100 mg/dL), and ApoB (<90 mg/dL) at all dose comparisons (P < 0.05 to P < 0.001). Baseline triglyceride levels had no effect on reaching LDL-C levels. Attainment of non-HDL-C (<100 mg/dL), and ApoB (<90 mg/dL) was lower at triglycerides ≥200 mg/dL than <200 mg/dL. Achievement of hs-CRP level (<2 mg/L) was comparable for both treatments. Significantly more patients attained both LDL-C (<70 mg/dL) and hs-CRP (<2 mg/L) at all E/S doses compared to A (P < 0.05 to P < 0.001), regardless of baseline CRP levels. Conclusion: E/S provides a therapeutic option to T2DM patients for lowering not only LDL-C, but also non-HDL-C, ApoB, and hs-CRP. These factors may help guide assessment and treatment of cardiovascular disease risk in these patients.

AB - Background: In addition to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), apolipoprotein B (ApoB), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) are considered predictive for cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. Objective: To assess the proportion of T2DM patients with hypercholesterolemia who attained the optional target level of LDL-C (<70 mg/dL) and additionally non-HDL-C (<100 mg/dL), ApoB (<90 mg/dL), and hs-CRP (<2 mg/L), following treatment with ezetimibe/simvastatin (E/S) vs atorvastatin (A). Methods: This post-hoc analysis of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, 6-week parallel study assessed the proportion of T2DM patients who attained specified LDL-C levels and non-HDL-C, ApoB, and hs-CRP with usual, recommended starting doses of E/S (10/20 mg) vs A (10 or 20 mg) and next highest doses of E/S (10/40 mg) vs A (40 mg) by logistic regression. Baseline triglyceride and hs-CRP effects were also evaluated. Results: Significantly higher percentages of patients treated with E/S compared to A achieved individual and concurrent target levels of LDL-C (<70 mg/dL), non-HDL-C (<100 mg/dL), and ApoB (<90 mg/dL) at all dose comparisons (P < 0.05 to P < 0.001). Baseline triglyceride levels had no effect on reaching LDL-C levels. Attainment of non-HDL-C (<100 mg/dL), and ApoB (<90 mg/dL) was lower at triglycerides ≥200 mg/dL than <200 mg/dL. Achievement of hs-CRP level (<2 mg/L) was comparable for both treatments. Significantly more patients attained both LDL-C (<70 mg/dL) and hs-CRP (<2 mg/L) at all E/S doses compared to A (P < 0.05 to P < 0.001), regardless of baseline CRP levels. Conclusion: E/S provides a therapeutic option to T2DM patients for lowering not only LDL-C, but also non-HDL-C, ApoB, and hs-CRP. These factors may help guide assessment and treatment of cardiovascular disease risk in these patients.

KW - ApoB

KW - Atorvastatin

KW - Ezetimibe/simvastatin

KW - Hs-CRP

KW - LDL-C

KW - Non-HDL-C

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=39149117012&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=39149117012&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jacl.2008.01.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jacl.2008.01.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 21291712

AN - SCOPUS:39149117012

VL - 2

SP - 25

EP - 35

JO - Journal of Clinical Lipidology

JF - Journal of Clinical Lipidology

SN - 1933-2874

IS - 1

ER -