Effect of anesthetic technique on acute formalin-induced pain in mice

Eugene Fu, J. E. Scharf

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Objectives. The aim of this study was to determine if anesthetic technique influences the degree of acute formalin-induced pain in mice. Methods. Mice were randomized to receive either combined spinal/general anesthesia or general anesthesia prior to a subcutaneous injection of formalin in a hindpaw. The mice in the combined spinal/general anesthesia group received halothane anesthesia and subarachnoid lidocaine. The mice in the general anesthesia group received halothane anesthesia only. After the mice recovered from anesthesia, paw-licking behavior was recorded for 1 hour. A statistical comparison was made using analysis of variance and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Results. The mice in the combined spinal/general anesthesia group (n = 20) had a significantly shorter time to first paw lick (mean ± SD) after formalin injection compared to the mice in the general anesthesia group (n = 20) (16.1 ± 4.5 vs. 22.1 ± 6.3 min, P = .002). No difference was observed in the number of paw licks in the mice receiving either combined spinal/general anesthesia or general anesthesia (40 ± 15 vs. 44 ± 18, P = .47). No difference was observed in the duration of paw licking in either group (231 ± 76 vs. 237 ± 124 s, P = .84). Conclusions. The administration of a pre-emptive subarachnoid lidocaine block in the combined spinal/general anesthesia group did not reduce the degree of formalin- induced paw-licking behavior. Combined spinal/general anesthesia did not decrease acute formalin-induced pain in mice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)217-221
Number of pages5
JournalRegional Anesthesia
Volume20
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jan 1 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

General Anesthesia
Formaldehyde
Anesthetics
Spinal Anesthesia
Pain
Anesthesia
Halothane
Lidocaine
Subcutaneous Injections
Nonparametric Statistics
Analysis of Variance
Injections

Keywords

  • formalin-induced pain
  • pre-emptive analgesia
  • regional anesthesia
  • spinal anesthesia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Effect of anesthetic technique on acute formalin-induced pain in mice. / Fu, Eugene; Scharf, J. E.

In: Regional Anesthesia, Vol. 20, No. 3, 01.01.1995, p. 217-221.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{138649c729a341a1b8eebe057fdd3215,
title = "Effect of anesthetic technique on acute formalin-induced pain in mice",
abstract = "Background and Objectives. The aim of this study was to determine if anesthetic technique influences the degree of acute formalin-induced pain in mice. Methods. Mice were randomized to receive either combined spinal/general anesthesia or general anesthesia prior to a subcutaneous injection of formalin in a hindpaw. The mice in the combined spinal/general anesthesia group received halothane anesthesia and subarachnoid lidocaine. The mice in the general anesthesia group received halothane anesthesia only. After the mice recovered from anesthesia, paw-licking behavior was recorded for 1 hour. A statistical comparison was made using analysis of variance and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Results. The mice in the combined spinal/general anesthesia group (n = 20) had a significantly shorter time to first paw lick (mean ± SD) after formalin injection compared to the mice in the general anesthesia group (n = 20) (16.1 ± 4.5 vs. 22.1 ± 6.3 min, P = .002). No difference was observed in the number of paw licks in the mice receiving either combined spinal/general anesthesia or general anesthesia (40 ± 15 vs. 44 ± 18, P = .47). No difference was observed in the duration of paw licking in either group (231 ± 76 vs. 237 ± 124 s, P = .84). Conclusions. The administration of a pre-emptive subarachnoid lidocaine block in the combined spinal/general anesthesia group did not reduce the degree of formalin- induced paw-licking behavior. Combined spinal/general anesthesia did not decrease acute formalin-induced pain in mice.",
keywords = "formalin-induced pain, pre-emptive analgesia, regional anesthesia, spinal anesthesia",
author = "Eugene Fu and Scharf, {J. E.}",
year = "1995",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "217--221",
journal = "Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine",
issn = "1098-7339",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of anesthetic technique on acute formalin-induced pain in mice

AU - Fu, Eugene

AU - Scharf, J. E.

PY - 1995/1/1

Y1 - 1995/1/1

N2 - Background and Objectives. The aim of this study was to determine if anesthetic technique influences the degree of acute formalin-induced pain in mice. Methods. Mice were randomized to receive either combined spinal/general anesthesia or general anesthesia prior to a subcutaneous injection of formalin in a hindpaw. The mice in the combined spinal/general anesthesia group received halothane anesthesia and subarachnoid lidocaine. The mice in the general anesthesia group received halothane anesthesia only. After the mice recovered from anesthesia, paw-licking behavior was recorded for 1 hour. A statistical comparison was made using analysis of variance and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Results. The mice in the combined spinal/general anesthesia group (n = 20) had a significantly shorter time to first paw lick (mean ± SD) after formalin injection compared to the mice in the general anesthesia group (n = 20) (16.1 ± 4.5 vs. 22.1 ± 6.3 min, P = .002). No difference was observed in the number of paw licks in the mice receiving either combined spinal/general anesthesia or general anesthesia (40 ± 15 vs. 44 ± 18, P = .47). No difference was observed in the duration of paw licking in either group (231 ± 76 vs. 237 ± 124 s, P = .84). Conclusions. The administration of a pre-emptive subarachnoid lidocaine block in the combined spinal/general anesthesia group did not reduce the degree of formalin- induced paw-licking behavior. Combined spinal/general anesthesia did not decrease acute formalin-induced pain in mice.

AB - Background and Objectives. The aim of this study was to determine if anesthetic technique influences the degree of acute formalin-induced pain in mice. Methods. Mice were randomized to receive either combined spinal/general anesthesia or general anesthesia prior to a subcutaneous injection of formalin in a hindpaw. The mice in the combined spinal/general anesthesia group received halothane anesthesia and subarachnoid lidocaine. The mice in the general anesthesia group received halothane anesthesia only. After the mice recovered from anesthesia, paw-licking behavior was recorded for 1 hour. A statistical comparison was made using analysis of variance and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Results. The mice in the combined spinal/general anesthesia group (n = 20) had a significantly shorter time to first paw lick (mean ± SD) after formalin injection compared to the mice in the general anesthesia group (n = 20) (16.1 ± 4.5 vs. 22.1 ± 6.3 min, P = .002). No difference was observed in the number of paw licks in the mice receiving either combined spinal/general anesthesia or general anesthesia (40 ± 15 vs. 44 ± 18, P = .47). No difference was observed in the duration of paw licking in either group (231 ± 76 vs. 237 ± 124 s, P = .84). Conclusions. The administration of a pre-emptive subarachnoid lidocaine block in the combined spinal/general anesthesia group did not reduce the degree of formalin- induced paw-licking behavior. Combined spinal/general anesthesia did not decrease acute formalin-induced pain in mice.

KW - formalin-induced pain

KW - pre-emptive analgesia

KW - regional anesthesia

KW - spinal anesthesia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029036908&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029036908&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 7547658

AN - SCOPUS:0029036908

VL - 20

SP - 217

EP - 221

JO - Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine

JF - Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine

SN - 1098-7339

IS - 3

ER -