Ecological factors and screening in child protective services

Susan J. Wells, Peter Lyons, Howard J. Doueck, C. Hendricks Brown, Judy Thomas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The locality in which a child is reported as maltreated is one of the most powerful predictors of whether that allegation will be investigated. This study examined the relationship between ecological factors and screening decisions made by child protective services (CPS) workers from 12 sites in 5 states. Of community sociodemographic characteristics, the number of families with children under age 18 was the strongest predictor of the rate of screening in a local CPS office. Rate of investigation was also positively related to a higher proportion of contacts alleging neglect and the allied community professionals having a positive relationship with CPS. When sociodemographic and reporting variables were combined, the proportion of neglect cases was the far stronger predictor. At the case level, when controlling for locality, worker beliefs that the role of CPS was a broad one and a worker's statements that resource availability was not a factor in the worker decision making process were both positively related to that worker's decision to investigate specific allegations of maltreatment or allegations of injury to a child. Although much research has focused on case-related factors in the screening decision, the results of this study suggest that factors from other levels of the decision ecology should not be ignored.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)981-997
Number of pages17
JournalChildren and Youth Services Review
Volume26
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2004

Fingerprint

environmental factors
worker
Ecology
neglect
Decision Making
underage
decision making process
maltreatment
Child Protective Services
Wounds and Injuries
community
ecology
Research
contact
resources

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Education
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Wells, S. J., Lyons, P., Doueck, H. J., Brown, C. H., & Thomas, J. (2004). Ecological factors and screening in child protective services. Children and Youth Services Review, 26(10), 981-997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2004.05.002

Ecological factors and screening in child protective services. / Wells, Susan J.; Lyons, Peter; Doueck, Howard J.; Brown, C. Hendricks; Thomas, Judy.

In: Children and Youth Services Review, Vol. 26, No. 10, 01.10.2004, p. 981-997.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wells, SJ, Lyons, P, Doueck, HJ, Brown, CH & Thomas, J 2004, 'Ecological factors and screening in child protective services', Children and Youth Services Review, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 981-997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2004.05.002
Wells, Susan J. ; Lyons, Peter ; Doueck, Howard J. ; Brown, C. Hendricks ; Thomas, Judy. / Ecological factors and screening in child protective services. In: Children and Youth Services Review. 2004 ; Vol. 26, No. 10. pp. 981-997.
@article{4be53b341f1c41bf80c654f3f1ca0968,
title = "Ecological factors and screening in child protective services",
abstract = "The locality in which a child is reported as maltreated is one of the most powerful predictors of whether that allegation will be investigated. This study examined the relationship between ecological factors and screening decisions made by child protective services (CPS) workers from 12 sites in 5 states. Of community sociodemographic characteristics, the number of families with children under age 18 was the strongest predictor of the rate of screening in a local CPS office. Rate of investigation was also positively related to a higher proportion of contacts alleging neglect and the allied community professionals having a positive relationship with CPS. When sociodemographic and reporting variables were combined, the proportion of neglect cases was the far stronger predictor. At the case level, when controlling for locality, worker beliefs that the role of CPS was a broad one and a worker's statements that resource availability was not a factor in the worker decision making process were both positively related to that worker's decision to investigate specific allegations of maltreatment or allegations of injury to a child. Although much research has focused on case-related factors in the screening decision, the results of this study suggest that factors from other levels of the decision ecology should not be ignored.",
author = "Wells, {Susan J.} and Peter Lyons and Doueck, {Howard J.} and Brown, {C. Hendricks} and Judy Thomas",
year = "2004",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.childyouth.2004.05.002",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "981--997",
journal = "Children and Youth Services Review",
issn = "0190-7409",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ecological factors and screening in child protective services

AU - Wells, Susan J.

AU - Lyons, Peter

AU - Doueck, Howard J.

AU - Brown, C. Hendricks

AU - Thomas, Judy

PY - 2004/10/1

Y1 - 2004/10/1

N2 - The locality in which a child is reported as maltreated is one of the most powerful predictors of whether that allegation will be investigated. This study examined the relationship between ecological factors and screening decisions made by child protective services (CPS) workers from 12 sites in 5 states. Of community sociodemographic characteristics, the number of families with children under age 18 was the strongest predictor of the rate of screening in a local CPS office. Rate of investigation was also positively related to a higher proportion of contacts alleging neglect and the allied community professionals having a positive relationship with CPS. When sociodemographic and reporting variables were combined, the proportion of neglect cases was the far stronger predictor. At the case level, when controlling for locality, worker beliefs that the role of CPS was a broad one and a worker's statements that resource availability was not a factor in the worker decision making process were both positively related to that worker's decision to investigate specific allegations of maltreatment or allegations of injury to a child. Although much research has focused on case-related factors in the screening decision, the results of this study suggest that factors from other levels of the decision ecology should not be ignored.

AB - The locality in which a child is reported as maltreated is one of the most powerful predictors of whether that allegation will be investigated. This study examined the relationship between ecological factors and screening decisions made by child protective services (CPS) workers from 12 sites in 5 states. Of community sociodemographic characteristics, the number of families with children under age 18 was the strongest predictor of the rate of screening in a local CPS office. Rate of investigation was also positively related to a higher proportion of contacts alleging neglect and the allied community professionals having a positive relationship with CPS. When sociodemographic and reporting variables were combined, the proportion of neglect cases was the far stronger predictor. At the case level, when controlling for locality, worker beliefs that the role of CPS was a broad one and a worker's statements that resource availability was not a factor in the worker decision making process were both positively related to that worker's decision to investigate specific allegations of maltreatment or allegations of injury to a child. Although much research has focused on case-related factors in the screening decision, the results of this study suggest that factors from other levels of the decision ecology should not be ignored.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4544356066&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4544356066&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.childyouth.2004.05.002

DO - 10.1016/j.childyouth.2004.05.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:4544356066

VL - 26

SP - 981

EP - 997

JO - Children and Youth Services Review

JF - Children and Youth Services Review

SN - 0190-7409

IS - 10

ER -