ECMWF and GFS model forecast verification during DYNAMO

Multiscale variability in MJO initiation over the equatorial Indian Ocean

Brandon W. Kerns, Shuyi S Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Improving understanding and prediction of the initiation of the Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO) over the equatorial Indian Ocean (IO) was a main objective of the Dynamics of the MJO (DYNAMO) field campaign. This study evaluates the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) and the National Centers for Environmental Prediction Global Forecast System (GFS) operational global model forecasts of MJO-2 in DYNAMO (November-December 2011). The model rainfall and 850 hPa zonal winds are compared with the Tropical Rainfall Measurement Mission (TRMM) rainfall and operational analysis in the equatorial IO. The ECMWF forecasts of the total equatorial rainfall were more consistent with TRMM observations. The GFS did not accurately predict the onset of equatorial convection beyond 5 day lead time. Instead, the GFS rainfall was mainly off the Equator in the Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ). The GFS did not capture synoptic scale systems that bring in dry air intrusions from the subtropics and disrupt convection in the ITCZ which is favorable for equatorial convection associated with the MJO initiation. DYNAMO observations suggest that multiscale interactions among convection, synoptic systems, and the MJO large-scale circulations were important for the initiation of MJO-2. The model forecasts and analysis of 850 hPa zonal wind are decomposed into mesoscale, synoptic, and large-scale flows. Results show that (1) both models have good initial conditions and 1-2 day forecasts and (2) the ECMWF has significantly better skill than the GFS in terms of forecasting equatorial convection, synoptic systems, and the large-scale MJO circulation at 5-15 day lead times. Key Points ECMWF and GFS both captured the observed MJO initiation in 1-2 days forecastsECMWF model forecasts were superior in the 5-15 day rangeECMWF forecasts better captured synoptic scale features and equatorial rain.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3736-3755
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Geophysical Research C: Oceans
Volume119
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Madden-Julian Oscillation
Madden-Julian oscillation
Indian Ocean
weather
forecasting
Rain
convection
rainfall
forecast
intertropical convergence zone
zonal wind
Convection

Keywords

  • convection
  • DYNAMO
  • MJO
  • rainfall
  • tropical
  • verification

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Atmospheric Science
  • Geophysics
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Space and Planetary Science

Cite this

ECMWF and GFS model forecast verification during DYNAMO : Multiscale variability in MJO initiation over the equatorial Indian Ocean. / Kerns, Brandon W.; Chen, Shuyi S.

In: Journal of Geophysical Research C: Oceans, Vol. 119, No. 7, 2014, p. 3736-3755.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cb1bac08d6c142e9b3cbd4db3f63db6e,
title = "ECMWF and GFS model forecast verification during DYNAMO: Multiscale variability in MJO initiation over the equatorial Indian Ocean",
abstract = "Improving understanding and prediction of the initiation of the Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO) over the equatorial Indian Ocean (IO) was a main objective of the Dynamics of the MJO (DYNAMO) field campaign. This study evaluates the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) and the National Centers for Environmental Prediction Global Forecast System (GFS) operational global model forecasts of MJO-2 in DYNAMO (November-December 2011). The model rainfall and 850 hPa zonal winds are compared with the Tropical Rainfall Measurement Mission (TRMM) rainfall and operational analysis in the equatorial IO. The ECMWF forecasts of the total equatorial rainfall were more consistent with TRMM observations. The GFS did not accurately predict the onset of equatorial convection beyond 5 day lead time. Instead, the GFS rainfall was mainly off the Equator in the Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ). The GFS did not capture synoptic scale systems that bring in dry air intrusions from the subtropics and disrupt convection in the ITCZ which is favorable for equatorial convection associated with the MJO initiation. DYNAMO observations suggest that multiscale interactions among convection, synoptic systems, and the MJO large-scale circulations were important for the initiation of MJO-2. The model forecasts and analysis of 850 hPa zonal wind are decomposed into mesoscale, synoptic, and large-scale flows. Results show that (1) both models have good initial conditions and 1-2 day forecasts and (2) the ECMWF has significantly better skill than the GFS in terms of forecasting equatorial convection, synoptic systems, and the large-scale MJO circulation at 5-15 day lead times. Key Points ECMWF and GFS both captured the observed MJO initiation in 1-2 days forecastsECMWF model forecasts were superior in the 5-15 day rangeECMWF forecasts better captured synoptic scale features and equatorial rain.",
keywords = "convection, DYNAMO, MJO, rainfall, tropical, verification",
author = "Kerns, {Brandon W.} and Chen, {Shuyi S}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1002/2013JD020833",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "119",
pages = "3736--3755",
journal = "Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans",
issn = "2169-9275",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ECMWF and GFS model forecast verification during DYNAMO

T2 - Multiscale variability in MJO initiation over the equatorial Indian Ocean

AU - Kerns, Brandon W.

AU - Chen, Shuyi S

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Improving understanding and prediction of the initiation of the Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO) over the equatorial Indian Ocean (IO) was a main objective of the Dynamics of the MJO (DYNAMO) field campaign. This study evaluates the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) and the National Centers for Environmental Prediction Global Forecast System (GFS) operational global model forecasts of MJO-2 in DYNAMO (November-December 2011). The model rainfall and 850 hPa zonal winds are compared with the Tropical Rainfall Measurement Mission (TRMM) rainfall and operational analysis in the equatorial IO. The ECMWF forecasts of the total equatorial rainfall were more consistent with TRMM observations. The GFS did not accurately predict the onset of equatorial convection beyond 5 day lead time. Instead, the GFS rainfall was mainly off the Equator in the Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ). The GFS did not capture synoptic scale systems that bring in dry air intrusions from the subtropics and disrupt convection in the ITCZ which is favorable for equatorial convection associated with the MJO initiation. DYNAMO observations suggest that multiscale interactions among convection, synoptic systems, and the MJO large-scale circulations were important for the initiation of MJO-2. The model forecasts and analysis of 850 hPa zonal wind are decomposed into mesoscale, synoptic, and large-scale flows. Results show that (1) both models have good initial conditions and 1-2 day forecasts and (2) the ECMWF has significantly better skill than the GFS in terms of forecasting equatorial convection, synoptic systems, and the large-scale MJO circulation at 5-15 day lead times. Key Points ECMWF and GFS both captured the observed MJO initiation in 1-2 days forecastsECMWF model forecasts were superior in the 5-15 day rangeECMWF forecasts better captured synoptic scale features and equatorial rain.

AB - Improving understanding and prediction of the initiation of the Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO) over the equatorial Indian Ocean (IO) was a main objective of the Dynamics of the MJO (DYNAMO) field campaign. This study evaluates the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) and the National Centers for Environmental Prediction Global Forecast System (GFS) operational global model forecasts of MJO-2 in DYNAMO (November-December 2011). The model rainfall and 850 hPa zonal winds are compared with the Tropical Rainfall Measurement Mission (TRMM) rainfall and operational analysis in the equatorial IO. The ECMWF forecasts of the total equatorial rainfall were more consistent with TRMM observations. The GFS did not accurately predict the onset of equatorial convection beyond 5 day lead time. Instead, the GFS rainfall was mainly off the Equator in the Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ). The GFS did not capture synoptic scale systems that bring in dry air intrusions from the subtropics and disrupt convection in the ITCZ which is favorable for equatorial convection associated with the MJO initiation. DYNAMO observations suggest that multiscale interactions among convection, synoptic systems, and the MJO large-scale circulations were important for the initiation of MJO-2. The model forecasts and analysis of 850 hPa zonal wind are decomposed into mesoscale, synoptic, and large-scale flows. Results show that (1) both models have good initial conditions and 1-2 day forecasts and (2) the ECMWF has significantly better skill than the GFS in terms of forecasting equatorial convection, synoptic systems, and the large-scale MJO circulation at 5-15 day lead times. Key Points ECMWF and GFS both captured the observed MJO initiation in 1-2 days forecastsECMWF model forecasts were superior in the 5-15 day rangeECMWF forecasts better captured synoptic scale features and equatorial rain.

KW - convection

KW - DYNAMO

KW - MJO

KW - rainfall

KW - tropical

KW - verification

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924948462&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84924948462&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/2013JD020833

DO - 10.1002/2013JD020833

M3 - Article

VL - 119

SP - 3736

EP - 3755

JO - Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans

JF - Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans

SN - 2169-9275

IS - 7

ER -