Early outcomes of locked noncemented stems for the management of proximal humeral fractures

a comparative study

Alberto Jorge-Mora, Samer Amhaz-Escanlar, Sabela Fernández-Pose, Cristina Lope-del-Teso, Jesús Pino-Mínguez, José Ramón Caeiro-Rey, Juan Abelardo Augusto Pretell, Rodolfo Gómez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Proximal humeral fractures are common and a major concern in public health resources utilization. There is an increase in the use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) as an option for complex fractures in the elderly. The complexity of the technique in RTSA is increased because of the fracture. To find an advantage of locking stems in RTSA for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures, we designed a comparative study between fracture-dedicated locking stems vs. cemented stems. Materials and methods: We retrospectively studied 58 patients treated with an RTSA after a fracture. We compared how the implant design and the tuberosity consolidation affects patient outcome through measuring range of motion and the Constant score. Results: The groups were similar in age, sex, time to surgery, and Constant score in the uninjured side. Patients treated with a dedicated locking noncemented stem performed better, with an increased Constant score (P >.05) and reached more mobility with no statistical significance. We found that 13 of the 24 fractures (54%) treated with a cemented stem consolidated, and 26 of 34 tuberosities (76%) healed in the noncemented locked stems. Patients with tuberosity consolidation acquired better range of motion and Constant scores (P <.05). Conclusions: A dedicated stem improves tuberosity healing and increases outcomes seen in Constant scores. Tuberosity consolidation is a main goal when treating proximal humeral fractures with RTSA.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)48-55
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Shoulder Fractures
Arthroplasty
Articular Range of Motion
Health Resources
Public Health

Keywords

  • fracture
  • humeral
  • Level III
  • noncemented
  • Proximal
  • Retrospective Cohort Design
  • reverse
  • Treatment Study
  • tuberosities

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Jorge-Mora, A., Amhaz-Escanlar, S., Fernández-Pose, S., Lope-del-Teso, C., Pino-Mínguez, J., Caeiro-Rey, J. R., ... Gómez, R. (2019). Early outcomes of locked noncemented stems for the management of proximal humeral fractures: a comparative study. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 28(1), 48-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.05.036

Early outcomes of locked noncemented stems for the management of proximal humeral fractures : a comparative study. / Jorge-Mora, Alberto; Amhaz-Escanlar, Samer; Fernández-Pose, Sabela; Lope-del-Teso, Cristina; Pino-Mínguez, Jesús; Caeiro-Rey, José Ramón; Pretell, Juan Abelardo Augusto; Gómez, Rodolfo.

In: Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Vol. 28, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 48-55.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jorge-Mora, A, Amhaz-Escanlar, S, Fernández-Pose, S, Lope-del-Teso, C, Pino-Mínguez, J, Caeiro-Rey, JR, Pretell, JAA & Gómez, R 2019, 'Early outcomes of locked noncemented stems for the management of proximal humeral fractures: a comparative study', Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 48-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.05.036
Jorge-Mora A, Amhaz-Escanlar S, Fernández-Pose S, Lope-del-Teso C, Pino-Mínguez J, Caeiro-Rey JR et al. Early outcomes of locked noncemented stems for the management of proximal humeral fractures: a comparative study. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2019 Jan 1;28(1):48-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.05.036
Jorge-Mora, Alberto ; Amhaz-Escanlar, Samer ; Fernández-Pose, Sabela ; Lope-del-Teso, Cristina ; Pino-Mínguez, Jesús ; Caeiro-Rey, José Ramón ; Pretell, Juan Abelardo Augusto ; Gómez, Rodolfo. / Early outcomes of locked noncemented stems for the management of proximal humeral fractures : a comparative study. In: Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2019 ; Vol. 28, No. 1. pp. 48-55.
@article{8cddecf2cd19420a82334d3bd2715926,
title = "Early outcomes of locked noncemented stems for the management of proximal humeral fractures: a comparative study",
abstract = "Background: Proximal humeral fractures are common and a major concern in public health resources utilization. There is an increase in the use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) as an option for complex fractures in the elderly. The complexity of the technique in RTSA is increased because of the fracture. To find an advantage of locking stems in RTSA for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures, we designed a comparative study between fracture-dedicated locking stems vs. cemented stems. Materials and methods: We retrospectively studied 58 patients treated with an RTSA after a fracture. We compared how the implant design and the tuberosity consolidation affects patient outcome through measuring range of motion and the Constant score. Results: The groups were similar in age, sex, time to surgery, and Constant score in the uninjured side. Patients treated with a dedicated locking noncemented stem performed better, with an increased Constant score (P >.05) and reached more mobility with no statistical significance. We found that 13 of the 24 fractures (54{\%}) treated with a cemented stem consolidated, and 26 of 34 tuberosities (76{\%}) healed in the noncemented locked stems. Patients with tuberosity consolidation acquired better range of motion and Constant scores (P <.05). Conclusions: A dedicated stem improves tuberosity healing and increases outcomes seen in Constant scores. Tuberosity consolidation is a main goal when treating proximal humeral fractures with RTSA.",
keywords = "fracture, humeral, Level III, noncemented, Proximal, Retrospective Cohort Design, reverse, Treatment Study, tuberosities",
author = "Alberto Jorge-Mora and Samer Amhaz-Escanlar and Sabela Fern{\'a}ndez-Pose and Cristina Lope-del-Teso and Jes{\'u}s Pino-M{\'i}nguez and Caeiro-Rey, {Jos{\'e} Ram{\'o}n} and Pretell, {Juan Abelardo Augusto} and Rodolfo G{\'o}mez",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jse.2018.05.036",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "48--55",
journal = "Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery",
issn = "1058-2746",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Early outcomes of locked noncemented stems for the management of proximal humeral fractures

T2 - a comparative study

AU - Jorge-Mora, Alberto

AU - Amhaz-Escanlar, Samer

AU - Fernández-Pose, Sabela

AU - Lope-del-Teso, Cristina

AU - Pino-Mínguez, Jesús

AU - Caeiro-Rey, José Ramón

AU - Pretell, Juan Abelardo Augusto

AU - Gómez, Rodolfo

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: Proximal humeral fractures are common and a major concern in public health resources utilization. There is an increase in the use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) as an option for complex fractures in the elderly. The complexity of the technique in RTSA is increased because of the fracture. To find an advantage of locking stems in RTSA for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures, we designed a comparative study between fracture-dedicated locking stems vs. cemented stems. Materials and methods: We retrospectively studied 58 patients treated with an RTSA after a fracture. We compared how the implant design and the tuberosity consolidation affects patient outcome through measuring range of motion and the Constant score. Results: The groups were similar in age, sex, time to surgery, and Constant score in the uninjured side. Patients treated with a dedicated locking noncemented stem performed better, with an increased Constant score (P >.05) and reached more mobility with no statistical significance. We found that 13 of the 24 fractures (54%) treated with a cemented stem consolidated, and 26 of 34 tuberosities (76%) healed in the noncemented locked stems. Patients with tuberosity consolidation acquired better range of motion and Constant scores (P <.05). Conclusions: A dedicated stem improves tuberosity healing and increases outcomes seen in Constant scores. Tuberosity consolidation is a main goal when treating proximal humeral fractures with RTSA.

AB - Background: Proximal humeral fractures are common and a major concern in public health resources utilization. There is an increase in the use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) as an option for complex fractures in the elderly. The complexity of the technique in RTSA is increased because of the fracture. To find an advantage of locking stems in RTSA for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures, we designed a comparative study between fracture-dedicated locking stems vs. cemented stems. Materials and methods: We retrospectively studied 58 patients treated with an RTSA after a fracture. We compared how the implant design and the tuberosity consolidation affects patient outcome through measuring range of motion and the Constant score. Results: The groups were similar in age, sex, time to surgery, and Constant score in the uninjured side. Patients treated with a dedicated locking noncemented stem performed better, with an increased Constant score (P >.05) and reached more mobility with no statistical significance. We found that 13 of the 24 fractures (54%) treated with a cemented stem consolidated, and 26 of 34 tuberosities (76%) healed in the noncemented locked stems. Patients with tuberosity consolidation acquired better range of motion and Constant scores (P <.05). Conclusions: A dedicated stem improves tuberosity healing and increases outcomes seen in Constant scores. Tuberosity consolidation is a main goal when treating proximal humeral fractures with RTSA.

KW - fracture

KW - humeral

KW - Level III

KW - noncemented

KW - Proximal

KW - Retrospective Cohort Design

KW - reverse

KW - Treatment Study

KW - tuberosities

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051399290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051399290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jse.2018.05.036

DO - 10.1016/j.jse.2018.05.036

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 48

EP - 55

JO - Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

JF - Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

SN - 1058-2746

IS - 1

ER -