Dual mechanism responsible for brachial plexus injuries

B. Brown, Ira Karmin, R. Lapinski, K. Lesale

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To define the maternal, neonatal and labor characteristics associated with obstetrical biachial plexus injuries in the presence and absence ol shoulder dvstocia and to determine the incidence of residual paraKsis. STUDY DESIGN: Medical i erords of neonates with a discharge diagnosis of brachial plexus injury were reviewed for the interxal ot 1991-1995. Data were tabulated loi' maternal, neonatal and labor characteristics including the presence or absence ol documented shoulder dvstocia. Using T-test and square lest, patients with documented shoulder dvstocia were compared to those without shoulder dvstocia. RESULTS: 36 neonates sustained brachial plexus injuries among '20,1175 livebirths (1.7 / 1000 births). 6 cases were excluded from comparison because of abnormal presentation or other confounding variables. In 17 rases a shoulder dystocia was documented while in 13 cases no shoulder dvstocia was identified. Neonates with shoulder cKstocia were statistically larger, had lower one minute Apgar scores, were more likely to be spontaneously delivered arid die right brachial plexus was more ol'ten injuied. Those without shoulder dvstocia, were more often delivered with forceps and the left brachial plexus was more often affected. In 6 cases parahsis was e\ident at the last visit however onlv one was followed more than a vcar. CONCLUSIONS: Among vertex presentations, brachial plexus injuries occur in two cluiicalh disiimt groups of patients. Tin' maternai, neonatal and laboi characteristics oi maternal neonatal pairs with obstetrical brachial plexus injuries are different for pairs that experience shoulder dvstocia uhen compared with those That do not. Different mechanisms of injnn appear lo be operative in tlie shoulder dvstocia group \ersus the nonshoulder dvstocia group. Adverse fetal outcome and residual paraivsis is uncommon in all groups.

LanguageEnglish (US)
JournalActa Diabetologica Latina
Volume176
Issue number1 PART II
StatePublished - 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Arm Injuries
Brachial Plexus
Mothers
Newborn Infant
Dystocia
Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)
Apgar Score
Tin
Surgical Instruments

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine
  • Endocrinology
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Cite this

Brown, B., Karmin, I., Lapinski, R., & Lesale, K. (1997). Dual mechanism responsible for brachial plexus injuries. Acta Diabetologica Latina, 176(1 PART II).

Dual mechanism responsible for brachial plexus injuries. / Brown, B.; Karmin, Ira; Lapinski, R.; Lesale, K.

In: Acta Diabetologica Latina, Vol. 176, No. 1 PART II, 1997.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brown, B, Karmin, I, Lapinski, R & Lesale, K 1997, 'Dual mechanism responsible for brachial plexus injuries' Acta Diabetologica Latina, vol. 176, no. 1 PART II.
Brown, B. ; Karmin, Ira ; Lapinski, R. ; Lesale, K. / Dual mechanism responsible for brachial plexus injuries. In: Acta Diabetologica Latina. 1997 ; Vol. 176, No. 1 PART II.
@article{81e314302bf0482999d98f0a4fa752b7,
title = "Dual mechanism responsible for brachial plexus injuries",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To define the maternal, neonatal and labor characteristics associated with obstetrical biachial plexus injuries in the presence and absence ol shoulder dvstocia and to determine the incidence of residual paraKsis. STUDY DESIGN: Medical i erords of neonates with a discharge diagnosis of brachial plexus injury were reviewed for the interxal ot 1991-1995. Data were tabulated loi' maternal, neonatal and labor characteristics including the presence or absence ol documented shoulder dvstocia. Using T-test and square lest, patients with documented shoulder dvstocia were compared to those without shoulder dvstocia. RESULTS: 36 neonates sustained brachial plexus injuries among '20,1175 livebirths (1.7 / 1000 births). 6 cases were excluded from comparison because of abnormal presentation or other confounding variables. In 17 rases a shoulder dystocia was documented while in 13 cases no shoulder dvstocia was identified. Neonates with shoulder cKstocia were statistically larger, had lower one minute Apgar scores, were more likely to be spontaneously delivered arid die right brachial plexus was more ol'ten injuied. Those without shoulder dvstocia, were more often delivered with forceps and the left brachial plexus was more often affected. In 6 cases parahsis was e\ident at the last visit however onlv one was followed more than a vcar. CONCLUSIONS: Among vertex presentations, brachial plexus injuries occur in two cluiicalh disiimt groups of patients. Tin' maternai, neonatal and laboi characteristics oi maternal neonatal pairs with obstetrical brachial plexus injuries are different for pairs that experience shoulder dvstocia uhen compared with those That do not. Different mechanisms of injnn appear lo be operative in tlie shoulder dvstocia group \ersus the nonshoulder dvstocia group. Adverse fetal outcome and residual paraivsis is uncommon in all groups.",
author = "B. Brown and Ira Karmin and R. Lapinski and K. Lesale",
year = "1997",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "176",
journal = "Acta Diabetologica",
issn = "0940-5429",
publisher = "Casa Editrice II Ponte",
number = "1 PART II",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dual mechanism responsible for brachial plexus injuries

AU - Brown, B.

AU - Karmin, Ira

AU - Lapinski, R.

AU - Lesale, K.

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To define the maternal, neonatal and labor characteristics associated with obstetrical biachial plexus injuries in the presence and absence ol shoulder dvstocia and to determine the incidence of residual paraKsis. STUDY DESIGN: Medical i erords of neonates with a discharge diagnosis of brachial plexus injury were reviewed for the interxal ot 1991-1995. Data were tabulated loi' maternal, neonatal and labor characteristics including the presence or absence ol documented shoulder dvstocia. Using T-test and square lest, patients with documented shoulder dvstocia were compared to those without shoulder dvstocia. RESULTS: 36 neonates sustained brachial plexus injuries among '20,1175 livebirths (1.7 / 1000 births). 6 cases were excluded from comparison because of abnormal presentation or other confounding variables. In 17 rases a shoulder dystocia was documented while in 13 cases no shoulder dvstocia was identified. Neonates with shoulder cKstocia were statistically larger, had lower one minute Apgar scores, were more likely to be spontaneously delivered arid die right brachial plexus was more ol'ten injuied. Those without shoulder dvstocia, were more often delivered with forceps and the left brachial plexus was more often affected. In 6 cases parahsis was e\ident at the last visit however onlv one was followed more than a vcar. CONCLUSIONS: Among vertex presentations, brachial plexus injuries occur in two cluiicalh disiimt groups of patients. Tin' maternai, neonatal and laboi characteristics oi maternal neonatal pairs with obstetrical brachial plexus injuries are different for pairs that experience shoulder dvstocia uhen compared with those That do not. Different mechanisms of injnn appear lo be operative in tlie shoulder dvstocia group \ersus the nonshoulder dvstocia group. Adverse fetal outcome and residual paraivsis is uncommon in all groups.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To define the maternal, neonatal and labor characteristics associated with obstetrical biachial plexus injuries in the presence and absence ol shoulder dvstocia and to determine the incidence of residual paraKsis. STUDY DESIGN: Medical i erords of neonates with a discharge diagnosis of brachial plexus injury were reviewed for the interxal ot 1991-1995. Data were tabulated loi' maternal, neonatal and labor characteristics including the presence or absence ol documented shoulder dvstocia. Using T-test and square lest, patients with documented shoulder dvstocia were compared to those without shoulder dvstocia. RESULTS: 36 neonates sustained brachial plexus injuries among '20,1175 livebirths (1.7 / 1000 births). 6 cases were excluded from comparison because of abnormal presentation or other confounding variables. In 17 rases a shoulder dystocia was documented while in 13 cases no shoulder dvstocia was identified. Neonates with shoulder cKstocia were statistically larger, had lower one minute Apgar scores, were more likely to be spontaneously delivered arid die right brachial plexus was more ol'ten injuied. Those without shoulder dvstocia, were more often delivered with forceps and the left brachial plexus was more often affected. In 6 cases parahsis was e\ident at the last visit however onlv one was followed more than a vcar. CONCLUSIONS: Among vertex presentations, brachial plexus injuries occur in two cluiicalh disiimt groups of patients. Tin' maternai, neonatal and laboi characteristics oi maternal neonatal pairs with obstetrical brachial plexus injuries are different for pairs that experience shoulder dvstocia uhen compared with those That do not. Different mechanisms of injnn appear lo be operative in tlie shoulder dvstocia group \ersus the nonshoulder dvstocia group. Adverse fetal outcome and residual paraivsis is uncommon in all groups.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748605559&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33748605559&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 176

JO - Acta Diabetologica

T2 - Acta Diabetologica

JF - Acta Diabetologica

SN - 0940-5429

IS - 1 PART II

ER -