Driver's Virtues

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Julia Driver's Uneasy Virtue offers a theory of virtue and the virtues without being an instance of virtue ethics. It presents a consequentialist challenge to recent virtue ethics, but its positive views – and especially its interesting examples – have great significance in their own right. Driver's defence of ‘virtues of ignorance’ has force despite all the challenges to it that have been mounted over the years. But there are also examples differing from those Driver has mentioned that favour the idea of such virtues. Perhaps certain virtues of religious faith and the virtue necessary for dealing as best one can with moral dilemmas both require ignorance. However, some of the examples Driver does discuss raise the question whether virtue status is based solely on consequences, rather than perhaps having (in addition) a motivational component.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)22-32
Number of pages11
JournalUtilitas
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2004

    Fingerprint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Driver's Virtues. / Slote, Michael.

In: Utilitas, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2004, p. 22-32.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle