Dose Effectiveness of Transthecal Digital Block

Thanapong Waitayawinyu, Seth Dodds, Sunyarn Niempoog

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The optimal volume of local anesthetic for transthecal digital block has not yet been identified. The goal of this study was to understand the effect of different volumes of local anesthetic using a modified transthecal digital block. Methods: We performed a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled study with normal volunteers. The subjects were randomly divided into 3 groups receiving 1, 2, or 3 mL of 1% lidocaine using a modified transthecal digital block. An investigator blinded to the assignment of subjects and dosages evaluated the onset, progression, and duration of anesthesia. Threshold sensory testing was performed every minute in the first 10-minute period and then at 15-minute intervals up to 85 minutes. Pain was assessed after infiltration using the visual analog scale. Results: A total of 45 blocks (15 subjects for each dosage) were performed. None of the volunteers who received 1-mL of block had adequate anesthesia. Mean onset of anesthesia with the 2-mL blocks was >6 minutes, whereas those of the 3-mL blocks took only 1.5 minutes. The mean progression and duration of anesthesia were quicker and longer, respectively, in the 3-mL blocks than the 2-mL ones. Pain associated with injection and discomfort after injection in the 2- and 3-mL blocks was not different, but was significantly higher than the 1-mL block. Conclusions: The effectiveness of the 3-mL modified transthecal digital block is greater than the 1- and 2-mL blocks in terms of rapidity of onset, completeness, and duration of anesthesia.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)458-462
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Hand Surgery
Volume34
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Anesthesia
Local Anesthetics
Sensory Thresholds
Pain
Injections
Lidocaine
Visual Analog Scale
Volunteers
Healthy Volunteers
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • digital block
  • dose
  • effectiveness
  • Transthecal

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Dose Effectiveness of Transthecal Digital Block. / Waitayawinyu, Thanapong; Dodds, Seth; Niempoog, Sunyarn.

In: Journal of Hand Surgery, Vol. 34, No. 3, 03.2009, p. 458-462.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Waitayawinyu, Thanapong ; Dodds, Seth ; Niempoog, Sunyarn. / Dose Effectiveness of Transthecal Digital Block. In: Journal of Hand Surgery. 2009 ; Vol. 34, No. 3. pp. 458-462.
@article{ab02eddc902946a9bc1631d52291e184,
title = "Dose Effectiveness of Transthecal Digital Block",
abstract = "Purpose: The optimal volume of local anesthetic for transthecal digital block has not yet been identified. The goal of this study was to understand the effect of different volumes of local anesthetic using a modified transthecal digital block. Methods: We performed a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled study with normal volunteers. The subjects were randomly divided into 3 groups receiving 1, 2, or 3 mL of 1{\%} lidocaine using a modified transthecal digital block. An investigator blinded to the assignment of subjects and dosages evaluated the onset, progression, and duration of anesthesia. Threshold sensory testing was performed every minute in the first 10-minute period and then at 15-minute intervals up to 85 minutes. Pain was assessed after infiltration using the visual analog scale. Results: A total of 45 blocks (15 subjects for each dosage) were performed. None of the volunteers who received 1-mL of block had adequate anesthesia. Mean onset of anesthesia with the 2-mL blocks was >6 minutes, whereas those of the 3-mL blocks took only 1.5 minutes. The mean progression and duration of anesthesia were quicker and longer, respectively, in the 3-mL blocks than the 2-mL ones. Pain associated with injection and discomfort after injection in the 2- and 3-mL blocks was not different, but was significantly higher than the 1-mL block. Conclusions: The effectiveness of the 3-mL modified transthecal digital block is greater than the 1- and 2-mL blocks in terms of rapidity of onset, completeness, and duration of anesthesia.",
keywords = "digital block, dose, effectiveness, Transthecal",
author = "Thanapong Waitayawinyu and Seth Dodds and Sunyarn Niempoog",
year = "2009",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.11.024",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "458--462",
journal = "Journal of Hand Surgery",
issn = "0363-5023",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dose Effectiveness of Transthecal Digital Block

AU - Waitayawinyu, Thanapong

AU - Dodds, Seth

AU - Niempoog, Sunyarn

PY - 2009/3

Y1 - 2009/3

N2 - Purpose: The optimal volume of local anesthetic for transthecal digital block has not yet been identified. The goal of this study was to understand the effect of different volumes of local anesthetic using a modified transthecal digital block. Methods: We performed a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled study with normal volunteers. The subjects were randomly divided into 3 groups receiving 1, 2, or 3 mL of 1% lidocaine using a modified transthecal digital block. An investigator blinded to the assignment of subjects and dosages evaluated the onset, progression, and duration of anesthesia. Threshold sensory testing was performed every minute in the first 10-minute period and then at 15-minute intervals up to 85 minutes. Pain was assessed after infiltration using the visual analog scale. Results: A total of 45 blocks (15 subjects for each dosage) were performed. None of the volunteers who received 1-mL of block had adequate anesthesia. Mean onset of anesthesia with the 2-mL blocks was >6 minutes, whereas those of the 3-mL blocks took only 1.5 minutes. The mean progression and duration of anesthesia were quicker and longer, respectively, in the 3-mL blocks than the 2-mL ones. Pain associated with injection and discomfort after injection in the 2- and 3-mL blocks was not different, but was significantly higher than the 1-mL block. Conclusions: The effectiveness of the 3-mL modified transthecal digital block is greater than the 1- and 2-mL blocks in terms of rapidity of onset, completeness, and duration of anesthesia.

AB - Purpose: The optimal volume of local anesthetic for transthecal digital block has not yet been identified. The goal of this study was to understand the effect of different volumes of local anesthetic using a modified transthecal digital block. Methods: We performed a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled study with normal volunteers. The subjects were randomly divided into 3 groups receiving 1, 2, or 3 mL of 1% lidocaine using a modified transthecal digital block. An investigator blinded to the assignment of subjects and dosages evaluated the onset, progression, and duration of anesthesia. Threshold sensory testing was performed every minute in the first 10-minute period and then at 15-minute intervals up to 85 minutes. Pain was assessed after infiltration using the visual analog scale. Results: A total of 45 blocks (15 subjects for each dosage) were performed. None of the volunteers who received 1-mL of block had adequate anesthesia. Mean onset of anesthesia with the 2-mL blocks was >6 minutes, whereas those of the 3-mL blocks took only 1.5 minutes. The mean progression and duration of anesthesia were quicker and longer, respectively, in the 3-mL blocks than the 2-mL ones. Pain associated with injection and discomfort after injection in the 2- and 3-mL blocks was not different, but was significantly higher than the 1-mL block. Conclusions: The effectiveness of the 3-mL modified transthecal digital block is greater than the 1- and 2-mL blocks in terms of rapidity of onset, completeness, and duration of anesthesia.

KW - digital block

KW - dose

KW - effectiveness

KW - Transthecal

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=61349101484&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=61349101484&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.11.024

DO - 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.11.024

M3 - Article

C2 - 19258143

AN - SCOPUS:61349101484

VL - 34

SP - 458

EP - 462

JO - Journal of Hand Surgery

JF - Journal of Hand Surgery

SN - 0363-5023

IS - 3

ER -