Does morality have a biological basis? An empirical test of the factors governing moral sentiments relating to incest

Debra Lieberman, John Tooby, Leda Cosmides

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

180 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Kin-recognition systems have been hypothesized to exist in humans, and adaptively to regulate altruism and incest avoidance among close genetic kin. This latter function allows the architecture of the kin recognition system to be mapped by quantitatively matching individual variation in opposition to incest to individual variation in developmental parameters, such as family structure and co-residence patterns. Methodological difficulties that appear when subjects are asked to disclose incestuous inclinations can be circumvented by measuring their opposition to incest in third parties, i.e. morality. This method allows a direct test of Westermarck's original hypothesis that childhood co-residence with an opposite-sex individual predicts the strength of moral sentiments regarding third-party sibling incest. Results support Westermarck's hypothesis and the model of kin recognition that it implies. Co-residence duration objectively predicts genetic relatedness, making it a reliable cue to kinship. Co-residence duration predicts the strength of opposition to incest, even after controlling for relatedness and even when co-residing individuals are genetically unrelated. This undercuts kin-recognition models requiring matching to self (through, for example, major histocompatibility complex or phenotypic markers). Subjects' beliefs about relatedness had no effect after controlling for co-residence, indicating that systems regulating kin-relevant behaviours are non-conscious, and calibrated by co-residence, not belief.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)819-826
Number of pages8
JournalProceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Volume270
Issue number1517
StatePublished - Apr 22 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Incest
kin recognition
morality
relatedness
individual variation
testing
family structure
major histocompatibility complex
altruism
duration
kinship
Altruism
childhood
genetic relationships
Major Histocompatibility Complex
Cues
Siblings
test
gender
Recognition (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Freud
  • Inbreeding
  • Incest
  • Kin recognition
  • Kin selection
  • Westermarck

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Does morality have a biological basis? An empirical test of the factors governing moral sentiments relating to incest. / Lieberman, Debra; Tooby, John; Cosmides, Leda.

In: Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 270, No. 1517, 22.04.2003, p. 819-826.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9440f50870fd48ffa2379f08ed4d04b5,
title = "Does morality have a biological basis? An empirical test of the factors governing moral sentiments relating to incest",
abstract = "Kin-recognition systems have been hypothesized to exist in humans, and adaptively to regulate altruism and incest avoidance among close genetic kin. This latter function allows the architecture of the kin recognition system to be mapped by quantitatively matching individual variation in opposition to incest to individual variation in developmental parameters, such as family structure and co-residence patterns. Methodological difficulties that appear when subjects are asked to disclose incestuous inclinations can be circumvented by measuring their opposition to incest in third parties, i.e. morality. This method allows a direct test of Westermarck's original hypothesis that childhood co-residence with an opposite-sex individual predicts the strength of moral sentiments regarding third-party sibling incest. Results support Westermarck's hypothesis and the model of kin recognition that it implies. Co-residence duration objectively predicts genetic relatedness, making it a reliable cue to kinship. Co-residence duration predicts the strength of opposition to incest, even after controlling for relatedness and even when co-residing individuals are genetically unrelated. This undercuts kin-recognition models requiring matching to self (through, for example, major histocompatibility complex or phenotypic markers). Subjects' beliefs about relatedness had no effect after controlling for co-residence, indicating that systems regulating kin-relevant behaviours are non-conscious, and calibrated by co-residence, not belief.",
keywords = "Freud, Inbreeding, Incest, Kin recognition, Kin selection, Westermarck",
author = "Debra Lieberman and John Tooby and Leda Cosmides",
year = "2003",
month = "4",
day = "22",
language = "English",
volume = "270",
pages = "819--826",
journal = "Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences",
issn = "0800-4622",
publisher = "Royal Society of London",
number = "1517",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does morality have a biological basis? An empirical test of the factors governing moral sentiments relating to incest

AU - Lieberman, Debra

AU - Tooby, John

AU - Cosmides, Leda

PY - 2003/4/22

Y1 - 2003/4/22

N2 - Kin-recognition systems have been hypothesized to exist in humans, and adaptively to regulate altruism and incest avoidance among close genetic kin. This latter function allows the architecture of the kin recognition system to be mapped by quantitatively matching individual variation in opposition to incest to individual variation in developmental parameters, such as family structure and co-residence patterns. Methodological difficulties that appear when subjects are asked to disclose incestuous inclinations can be circumvented by measuring their opposition to incest in third parties, i.e. morality. This method allows a direct test of Westermarck's original hypothesis that childhood co-residence with an opposite-sex individual predicts the strength of moral sentiments regarding third-party sibling incest. Results support Westermarck's hypothesis and the model of kin recognition that it implies. Co-residence duration objectively predicts genetic relatedness, making it a reliable cue to kinship. Co-residence duration predicts the strength of opposition to incest, even after controlling for relatedness and even when co-residing individuals are genetically unrelated. This undercuts kin-recognition models requiring matching to self (through, for example, major histocompatibility complex or phenotypic markers). Subjects' beliefs about relatedness had no effect after controlling for co-residence, indicating that systems regulating kin-relevant behaviours are non-conscious, and calibrated by co-residence, not belief.

AB - Kin-recognition systems have been hypothesized to exist in humans, and adaptively to regulate altruism and incest avoidance among close genetic kin. This latter function allows the architecture of the kin recognition system to be mapped by quantitatively matching individual variation in opposition to incest to individual variation in developmental parameters, such as family structure and co-residence patterns. Methodological difficulties that appear when subjects are asked to disclose incestuous inclinations can be circumvented by measuring their opposition to incest in third parties, i.e. morality. This method allows a direct test of Westermarck's original hypothesis that childhood co-residence with an opposite-sex individual predicts the strength of moral sentiments regarding third-party sibling incest. Results support Westermarck's hypothesis and the model of kin recognition that it implies. Co-residence duration objectively predicts genetic relatedness, making it a reliable cue to kinship. Co-residence duration predicts the strength of opposition to incest, even after controlling for relatedness and even when co-residing individuals are genetically unrelated. This undercuts kin-recognition models requiring matching to self (through, for example, major histocompatibility complex or phenotypic markers). Subjects' beliefs about relatedness had no effect after controlling for co-residence, indicating that systems regulating kin-relevant behaviours are non-conscious, and calibrated by co-residence, not belief.

KW - Freud

KW - Inbreeding

KW - Incest

KW - Kin recognition

KW - Kin selection

KW - Westermarck

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037461264&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037461264&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 12737660

AN - SCOPUS:0037461264

VL - 270

SP - 819

EP - 826

JO - Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

JF - Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

SN - 0800-4622

IS - 1517

ER -