Does form follow function? Academic law libraries' organizational structures for collection development

Connie Lenz, Helen Wohl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

While academic law libraries devote a large portion of their budgets to creating and maintaining their collections, little has been written about the organizational structures for the full range of collection development functions in these libraries. To explore this issue, the ALL-SIS Collection Development Committee surveyed nineteen academic law libraries, asking detailed questions about the libraries' collection development practices and organizational structures, with the aim of defining what organizational forms best support collection development functions. This article begins by defining collection development functions, and reviewing law library literature examining organizational structures for collection development. The article then presents the findings of the in-depth survey, analyzes the results, and recommends best practices emerging from the survey responses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)59-116
Number of pages58
JournalLaw Library Journal
Volume100
Issue number1
StatePublished - Dec 1 2008

Fingerprint

academic law
organizational structure
best practice
budget
Law

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law
  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

Does form follow function? Academic law libraries' organizational structures for collection development. / Lenz, Connie; Wohl, Helen.

In: Law Library Journal, Vol. 100, No. 1, 01.12.2008, p. 59-116.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4534dcbed8b54c6fb1ae7ff1c2389284,
title = "Does form follow function? Academic law libraries' organizational structures for collection development",
abstract = "While academic law libraries devote a large portion of their budgets to creating and maintaining their collections, little has been written about the organizational structures for the full range of collection development functions in these libraries. To explore this issue, the ALL-SIS Collection Development Committee surveyed nineteen academic law libraries, asking detailed questions about the libraries' collection development practices and organizational structures, with the aim of defining what organizational forms best support collection development functions. This article begins by defining collection development functions, and reviewing law library literature examining organizational structures for collection development. The article then presents the findings of the in-depth survey, analyzes the results, and recommends best practices emerging from the survey responses.",
author = "Connie Lenz and Helen Wohl",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "100",
pages = "59--116",
journal = "Law Library Journal",
issn = "0023-9283",
publisher = "American Association of Law Libraries",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does form follow function? Academic law libraries' organizational structures for collection development

AU - Lenz, Connie

AU - Wohl, Helen

PY - 2008/12/1

Y1 - 2008/12/1

N2 - While academic law libraries devote a large portion of their budgets to creating and maintaining their collections, little has been written about the organizational structures for the full range of collection development functions in these libraries. To explore this issue, the ALL-SIS Collection Development Committee surveyed nineteen academic law libraries, asking detailed questions about the libraries' collection development practices and organizational structures, with the aim of defining what organizational forms best support collection development functions. This article begins by defining collection development functions, and reviewing law library literature examining organizational structures for collection development. The article then presents the findings of the in-depth survey, analyzes the results, and recommends best practices emerging from the survey responses.

AB - While academic law libraries devote a large portion of their budgets to creating and maintaining their collections, little has been written about the organizational structures for the full range of collection development functions in these libraries. To explore this issue, the ALL-SIS Collection Development Committee surveyed nineteen academic law libraries, asking detailed questions about the libraries' collection development practices and organizational structures, with the aim of defining what organizational forms best support collection development functions. This article begins by defining collection development functions, and reviewing law library literature examining organizational structures for collection development. The article then presents the findings of the in-depth survey, analyzes the results, and recommends best practices emerging from the survey responses.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=40949083411&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=40949083411&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 100

SP - 59

EP - 116

JO - Law Library Journal

JF - Law Library Journal

SN - 0023-9283

IS - 1

ER -