Does combat hearing preservation equipment affect balance?

Art Ambrosio, Ali N. Hoffer, Michael E Hoffer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: (1) To investigate whether the occlusion effect and hearing attenuation produced by 3M Combat Arms Ear Plugs (CAEP) affects balance when compared to no hearing protection and (2) to investigate whether the occlusion effect and noise-canceling capabilities of the Nacre QuietPro system affects balance when compared to no hearing protection. Methods: This prospective study collected pilot data for investigation of mechanisms of balance. 20 subjects with normal hearing and no vestibular dysfunction were tested with blackened goggles in three conditions—no hearing protection, CAEP, and with the Nacre QuietPro. Results: A static posturogrpahy forceplate was used to measure center of gravity angular acceleration for a period of 20 seconds. The order of the conditions tested was randomized for each individual. Mean angular acceleration and standard deviation (degrees/second) of the three conditions were: (1) no hearing protection (control), 0.65 + 0.19, (2) CAEP, 0.69 + 0.23, and (3) QuietPro, 0.70 + 0.20 (one-way analysis of variance [ANOVA], df = 2, F = 0.38, p = 0.706). Conclusions: The components of an intact balance system include a variety of neural inputs, to include vesitbuloocular, vestibulospinal, and labyrinthine afferents. Both the CAEP and Nacre QuietPro are hearing preservation devices utilized during Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan. Our pilot data show no decrement in balance with utilization of these combat hearing preservation devices.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number230
Pages (from-to)230-233
Number of pages4
JournalMilitary Medicine
Volume182
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2017

Fingerprint

Hearing
Equipment and Supplies
Nacre
Ear
2003-2011 Iraq War
Afghan Campaign 2001-
Eye Protective Devices
Afghanistan
Gravitation
Noise
Analysis of Variance
Prospective Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Does combat hearing preservation equipment affect balance? / Ambrosio, Art; Hoffer, Ali N.; Hoffer, Michael E.

In: Military Medicine, Vol. 182, 230, 01.03.2017, p. 230-233.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ambrosio, Art ; Hoffer, Ali N. ; Hoffer, Michael E. / Does combat hearing preservation equipment affect balance?. In: Military Medicine. 2017 ; Vol. 182. pp. 230-233.
@article{6116e8ef80e3448a9b693fd0d256f4af,
title = "Does combat hearing preservation equipment affect balance?",
abstract = "Objectives: (1) To investigate whether the occlusion effect and hearing attenuation produced by 3M Combat Arms Ear Plugs (CAEP) affects balance when compared to no hearing protection and (2) to investigate whether the occlusion effect and noise-canceling capabilities of the Nacre QuietPro system affects balance when compared to no hearing protection. Methods: This prospective study collected pilot data for investigation of mechanisms of balance. 20 subjects with normal hearing and no vestibular dysfunction were tested with blackened goggles in three conditions—no hearing protection, CAEP, and with the Nacre QuietPro. Results: A static posturogrpahy forceplate was used to measure center of gravity angular acceleration for a period of 20 seconds. The order of the conditions tested was randomized for each individual. Mean angular acceleration and standard deviation (degrees/second) of the three conditions were: (1) no hearing protection (control), 0.65 + 0.19, (2) CAEP, 0.69 + 0.23, and (3) QuietPro, 0.70 + 0.20 (one-way analysis of variance [ANOVA], df = 2, F = 0.38, p = 0.706). Conclusions: The components of an intact balance system include a variety of neural inputs, to include vesitbuloocular, vestibulospinal, and labyrinthine afferents. Both the CAEP and Nacre QuietPro are hearing preservation devices utilized during Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan. Our pilot data show no decrement in balance with utilization of these combat hearing preservation devices.",
author = "Art Ambrosio and Hoffer, {Ali N.} and Hoffer, {Michael E}",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.7205/MILMED-D-16-00043",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "182",
pages = "230--233",
journal = "Military Medicine",
issn = "0026-4075",
publisher = "Association of Military Surgeons of the US",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does combat hearing preservation equipment affect balance?

AU - Ambrosio, Art

AU - Hoffer, Ali N.

AU - Hoffer, Michael E

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Objectives: (1) To investigate whether the occlusion effect and hearing attenuation produced by 3M Combat Arms Ear Plugs (CAEP) affects balance when compared to no hearing protection and (2) to investigate whether the occlusion effect and noise-canceling capabilities of the Nacre QuietPro system affects balance when compared to no hearing protection. Methods: This prospective study collected pilot data for investigation of mechanisms of balance. 20 subjects with normal hearing and no vestibular dysfunction were tested with blackened goggles in three conditions—no hearing protection, CAEP, and with the Nacre QuietPro. Results: A static posturogrpahy forceplate was used to measure center of gravity angular acceleration for a period of 20 seconds. The order of the conditions tested was randomized for each individual. Mean angular acceleration and standard deviation (degrees/second) of the three conditions were: (1) no hearing protection (control), 0.65 + 0.19, (2) CAEP, 0.69 + 0.23, and (3) QuietPro, 0.70 + 0.20 (one-way analysis of variance [ANOVA], df = 2, F = 0.38, p = 0.706). Conclusions: The components of an intact balance system include a variety of neural inputs, to include vesitbuloocular, vestibulospinal, and labyrinthine afferents. Both the CAEP and Nacre QuietPro are hearing preservation devices utilized during Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan. Our pilot data show no decrement in balance with utilization of these combat hearing preservation devices.

AB - Objectives: (1) To investigate whether the occlusion effect and hearing attenuation produced by 3M Combat Arms Ear Plugs (CAEP) affects balance when compared to no hearing protection and (2) to investigate whether the occlusion effect and noise-canceling capabilities of the Nacre QuietPro system affects balance when compared to no hearing protection. Methods: This prospective study collected pilot data for investigation of mechanisms of balance. 20 subjects with normal hearing and no vestibular dysfunction were tested with blackened goggles in three conditions—no hearing protection, CAEP, and with the Nacre QuietPro. Results: A static posturogrpahy forceplate was used to measure center of gravity angular acceleration for a period of 20 seconds. The order of the conditions tested was randomized for each individual. Mean angular acceleration and standard deviation (degrees/second) of the three conditions were: (1) no hearing protection (control), 0.65 + 0.19, (2) CAEP, 0.69 + 0.23, and (3) QuietPro, 0.70 + 0.20 (one-way analysis of variance [ANOVA], df = 2, F = 0.38, p = 0.706). Conclusions: The components of an intact balance system include a variety of neural inputs, to include vesitbuloocular, vestibulospinal, and labyrinthine afferents. Both the CAEP and Nacre QuietPro are hearing preservation devices utilized during Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan. Our pilot data show no decrement in balance with utilization of these combat hearing preservation devices.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015191882&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85015191882&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7205/MILMED-D-16-00043

DO - 10.7205/MILMED-D-16-00043

M3 - Article

C2 - 28291479

AN - SCOPUS:85015191882

VL - 182

SP - 230

EP - 233

JO - Military Medicine

JF - Military Medicine

SN - 0026-4075

M1 - 230

ER -