Documentation patterns before cataract surgery at ten academic centers

P. P. Lee, L. Hilborne, L. McDonald, J. K. Tobacman, H. Kolder, Thomas Johnson, R. H. Brook

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the adequacy of documenting the preoperative evaluation for cataract surgery using criteria derived from published practice guidelines. Methods: In 1990, 1139 surgeries that were performed on 1139 patients at ten institutions of the Academic Medical Center Consortium were reviewed for completeness of documentation of the preoperative evaluation. Criteria for completeness were derived from the American Academy of Ophthalmology Preferred Practice Pattern on cataract evaluation and the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research-sponsored guidelines. Results: Twenty-six percent of charts lacked documentation of at least one of four basic elements of the preoperative evaluation. These four elements are (1) vision in the surgical eye; (2) vision in the fellow eye; (3) evaluation of the fundus, macula, or visual potential in the surgical eye; and (4) presence of some form (general or specific) of functional visual impairment. If, as stated in the guideline, a specific deficit in visual functioning should be identified, then 40% of charts fail to meet criteria. Conclusion: Documentation of the ocular preoperative assessment for cataract surgery is inadequate in more than one quarter of cases. The relation between lack of documentation and incompleteness of the examination is unknown. Improved documentation is needed to better measure and enhance the quality of care.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1179-1183
Number of pages5
JournalOphthalmology
Volume103
Issue number8
StatePublished - Sep 5 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Documentation
Cataract
United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Guidelines
Quality of Health Care
Vision Disorders
Practice Guidelines

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Lee, P. P., Hilborne, L., McDonald, L., Tobacman, J. K., Kolder, H., Johnson, T., & Brook, R. H. (1996). Documentation patterns before cataract surgery at ten academic centers. Ophthalmology, 103(8), 1179-1183.

Documentation patterns before cataract surgery at ten academic centers. / Lee, P. P.; Hilborne, L.; McDonald, L.; Tobacman, J. K.; Kolder, H.; Johnson, Thomas; Brook, R. H.

In: Ophthalmology, Vol. 103, No. 8, 05.09.1996, p. 1179-1183.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lee, PP, Hilborne, L, McDonald, L, Tobacman, JK, Kolder, H, Johnson, T & Brook, RH 1996, 'Documentation patterns before cataract surgery at ten academic centers', Ophthalmology, vol. 103, no. 8, pp. 1179-1183.
Lee PP, Hilborne L, McDonald L, Tobacman JK, Kolder H, Johnson T et al. Documentation patterns before cataract surgery at ten academic centers. Ophthalmology. 1996 Sep 5;103(8):1179-1183.
Lee, P. P. ; Hilborne, L. ; McDonald, L. ; Tobacman, J. K. ; Kolder, H. ; Johnson, Thomas ; Brook, R. H. / Documentation patterns before cataract surgery at ten academic centers. In: Ophthalmology. 1996 ; Vol. 103, No. 8. pp. 1179-1183.
@article{cb85936d416b46bcaa4940dacccab26e,
title = "Documentation patterns before cataract surgery at ten academic centers",
abstract = "Purpose: To determine the adequacy of documenting the preoperative evaluation for cataract surgery using criteria derived from published practice guidelines. Methods: In 1990, 1139 surgeries that were performed on 1139 patients at ten institutions of the Academic Medical Center Consortium were reviewed for completeness of documentation of the preoperative evaluation. Criteria for completeness were derived from the American Academy of Ophthalmology Preferred Practice Pattern on cataract evaluation and the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research-sponsored guidelines. Results: Twenty-six percent of charts lacked documentation of at least one of four basic elements of the preoperative evaluation. These four elements are (1) vision in the surgical eye; (2) vision in the fellow eye; (3) evaluation of the fundus, macula, or visual potential in the surgical eye; and (4) presence of some form (general or specific) of functional visual impairment. If, as stated in the guideline, a specific deficit in visual functioning should be identified, then 40{\%} of charts fail to meet criteria. Conclusion: Documentation of the ocular preoperative assessment for cataract surgery is inadequate in more than one quarter of cases. The relation between lack of documentation and incompleteness of the examination is unknown. Improved documentation is needed to better measure and enhance the quality of care.",
author = "Lee, {P. P.} and L. Hilborne and L. McDonald and Tobacman, {J. K.} and H. Kolder and Thomas Johnson and Brook, {R. H.}",
year = "1996",
month = "9",
day = "5",
language = "English",
volume = "103",
pages = "1179--1183",
journal = "Ophthalmology",
issn = "0161-6420",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Documentation patterns before cataract surgery at ten academic centers

AU - Lee, P. P.

AU - Hilborne, L.

AU - McDonald, L.

AU - Tobacman, J. K.

AU - Kolder, H.

AU - Johnson, Thomas

AU - Brook, R. H.

PY - 1996/9/5

Y1 - 1996/9/5

N2 - Purpose: To determine the adequacy of documenting the preoperative evaluation for cataract surgery using criteria derived from published practice guidelines. Methods: In 1990, 1139 surgeries that were performed on 1139 patients at ten institutions of the Academic Medical Center Consortium were reviewed for completeness of documentation of the preoperative evaluation. Criteria for completeness were derived from the American Academy of Ophthalmology Preferred Practice Pattern on cataract evaluation and the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research-sponsored guidelines. Results: Twenty-six percent of charts lacked documentation of at least one of four basic elements of the preoperative evaluation. These four elements are (1) vision in the surgical eye; (2) vision in the fellow eye; (3) evaluation of the fundus, macula, or visual potential in the surgical eye; and (4) presence of some form (general or specific) of functional visual impairment. If, as stated in the guideline, a specific deficit in visual functioning should be identified, then 40% of charts fail to meet criteria. Conclusion: Documentation of the ocular preoperative assessment for cataract surgery is inadequate in more than one quarter of cases. The relation between lack of documentation and incompleteness of the examination is unknown. Improved documentation is needed to better measure and enhance the quality of care.

AB - Purpose: To determine the adequacy of documenting the preoperative evaluation for cataract surgery using criteria derived from published practice guidelines. Methods: In 1990, 1139 surgeries that were performed on 1139 patients at ten institutions of the Academic Medical Center Consortium were reviewed for completeness of documentation of the preoperative evaluation. Criteria for completeness were derived from the American Academy of Ophthalmology Preferred Practice Pattern on cataract evaluation and the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research-sponsored guidelines. Results: Twenty-six percent of charts lacked documentation of at least one of four basic elements of the preoperative evaluation. These four elements are (1) vision in the surgical eye; (2) vision in the fellow eye; (3) evaluation of the fundus, macula, or visual potential in the surgical eye; and (4) presence of some form (general or specific) of functional visual impairment. If, as stated in the guideline, a specific deficit in visual functioning should be identified, then 40% of charts fail to meet criteria. Conclusion: Documentation of the ocular preoperative assessment for cataract surgery is inadequate in more than one quarter of cases. The relation between lack of documentation and incompleteness of the examination is unknown. Improved documentation is needed to better measure and enhance the quality of care.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029829115&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029829115&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8764784

AN - SCOPUS:0029829115

VL - 103

SP - 1179

EP - 1183

JO - Ophthalmology

JF - Ophthalmology

SN - 0161-6420

IS - 8

ER -