Do people with intellectual disability require special human subjects research protections? The interplay of history, ethics, and policy

Chris Feudtner, Jeffrey P Brosco

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

People with intellectual disability (ID) have a long history of discrimination and stigmatization, and a more recent history of pride and self-advocacy. The early history suggests that people with ID are a vulnerable population and deserve special research protections as do some other groups; the disability rights movement of the late 20th century aligns people with ID more closely with the principle of autonomy that has guided clinical and research ethics for the last 40 years. In examining the history of people with ID and the prevailing framework of human subjects research protections in the United States, we conclude that people with ID do not require special protection in human subjects research. The protections that have already been put in place for all individuals, if conscientiously and effectively implemented, achieve the right balance between safeguarding the interest of human research subjects and empowering individuals who choose to do so to participate in research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)52-56
Number of pages5
JournalDevelopmental Disabilities Research Reviews
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Human Experimentation
Disabled Persons
Ethics
Intellectual Disability
History
Clinical Ethics
Research Subjects
Research Ethics
Stereotyping
Vulnerable Populations
Research

Keywords

  • Human subjects research
  • Intellectual disability
  • Medical ethics
  • Research ethics
  • Vulnerable populations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

@article{b487a96a6b4943c789dc903d142c8cfa,
title = "Do people with intellectual disability require special human subjects research protections? The interplay of history, ethics, and policy",
abstract = "People with intellectual disability (ID) have a long history of discrimination and stigmatization, and a more recent history of pride and self-advocacy. The early history suggests that people with ID are a vulnerable population and deserve special research protections as do some other groups; the disability rights movement of the late 20th century aligns people with ID more closely with the principle of autonomy that has guided clinical and research ethics for the last 40 years. In examining the history of people with ID and the prevailing framework of human subjects research protections in the United States, we conclude that people with ID do not require special protection in human subjects research. The protections that have already been put in place for all individuals, if conscientiously and effectively implemented, achieve the right balance between safeguarding the interest of human research subjects and empowering individuals who choose to do so to participate in research.",
keywords = "Human subjects research, Intellectual disability, Medical ethics, Research ethics, Vulnerable populations",
author = "Chris Feudtner and Brosco, {Jeffrey P}",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/ddrr.139",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "52--56",
journal = "Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews",
issn = "1940-5510",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do people with intellectual disability require special human subjects research protections? The interplay of history, ethics, and policy

AU - Feudtner, Chris

AU - Brosco, Jeffrey P

PY - 2011/12/1

Y1 - 2011/12/1

N2 - People with intellectual disability (ID) have a long history of discrimination and stigmatization, and a more recent history of pride and self-advocacy. The early history suggests that people with ID are a vulnerable population and deserve special research protections as do some other groups; the disability rights movement of the late 20th century aligns people with ID more closely with the principle of autonomy that has guided clinical and research ethics for the last 40 years. In examining the history of people with ID and the prevailing framework of human subjects research protections in the United States, we conclude that people with ID do not require special protection in human subjects research. The protections that have already been put in place for all individuals, if conscientiously and effectively implemented, achieve the right balance between safeguarding the interest of human research subjects and empowering individuals who choose to do so to participate in research.

AB - People with intellectual disability (ID) have a long history of discrimination and stigmatization, and a more recent history of pride and self-advocacy. The early history suggests that people with ID are a vulnerable population and deserve special research protections as do some other groups; the disability rights movement of the late 20th century aligns people with ID more closely with the principle of autonomy that has guided clinical and research ethics for the last 40 years. In examining the history of people with ID and the prevailing framework of human subjects research protections in the United States, we conclude that people with ID do not require special protection in human subjects research. The protections that have already been put in place for all individuals, if conscientiously and effectively implemented, achieve the right balance between safeguarding the interest of human research subjects and empowering individuals who choose to do so to participate in research.

KW - Human subjects research

KW - Intellectual disability

KW - Medical ethics

KW - Research ethics

KW - Vulnerable populations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84868224598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84868224598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ddrr.139

DO - 10.1002/ddrr.139

M3 - Article

C2 - 22447756

AN - SCOPUS:84868224598

VL - 17

SP - 52

EP - 56

JO - Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews

JF - Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews

SN - 1940-5510

IS - 1

ER -